US Army

Army Remains Strong, But Stretched, Offi­cials Say

By Ger­ry J. Gilmore
Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice

The U.S. Army remains ready to engage and defeat America’s ene­mies despite expe­ri­enc­ing strain after sev­en years of wartime deploy­ments, the Army’s top civil­ian and mil­i­tary lead­ers told a Sen­ate pan­el here today.

“Our Army is stretched by demands of this long war, but it remains an extra­or­di­nary Army,” Army Sec­re­tary Pete Geren told mem­bers of the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee. “It is the best-led, best-equipped and best-trained Army we’ve ever put in the field.

“Today, we are an Army long at war,” Geren con­tin­ued, not­ing U.S. sol­diers have fought in Afghanistan for sev­en years and bat­tled in Iraq for about five years.

The war against glob­al ter­ror­ism is the third-longest war in Amer­i­can his­to­ry, Geren said, behind the Rev­o­lu­tion­ary War and the Viet­nam War. It also is the longest U.S. war being fought by all-vol­un­teer forces, he added.

The Army cur­rent­ly has 250,000 sol­diers deployed to 80 coun­tries, Geren said, includ­ing those deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Sol­diers deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan “are our top pri­or­i­ty, and we will nev­er take our eye off of that ball,” Geren empha­sized.

The near­ly $141 bil­lion allo­cat­ed for the Army under the fis­cal 2009 defense bud­get and sup­ple­men­tal fund­ing “ensure that our sol­diers have what they need, when they need it,” Geren said.

The bud­get con­tains mon­ey for the Army to put its 64,000-soldier expan­sion on the front burn­er, Geren not­ed. “We have accel­er­at­ed the 64,000-man growth in the active-duty Army from 2012 to 2010, with a com­mit­ment that we will main­tain recruit qual­i­ty at no low­er than the 2006 lev­els,” he report­ed.

These added sol­diers will assist in meet­ing wartime require­ments dur­ing a peri­od of per­sis­tent con­flict that is chal­leng­ing the Army’s sol­diers and their fam­i­lies, Geren said. “But, our Army remains strong,” he empha­sized. “It’s stretched; it is out of bal­ance; but it is resilient. Those who seek par­al­lels with the ‘hol­low Army’ of the late ’70s will not find it.”

Despite the chal­lenges, the all-vol­un­teer Army con­tin­ues to meet its recruit­ing and reten­tion goals, Geren said. “They’re vol­un­teer sol­diers; they’re vol­un­teer fam­i­lies,” he said. “They’re proud of who they are, and they’re proud of what they do. We all are inspired by their ser­vice and hum­bled by their sac­ri­fice.”

The Nation­al Guard and Army Reserve also have made heavy con­tri­bu­tions to the war effort, Geren said, not­ing that 184,000 reservists and 270,000 Nation­al Guard mem­bers have been acti­vat­ed for ser­vice in the war against glob­al ter­ror­ism since the ter­ror­ist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Reserve-com­po­nent mem­bers also stepped up dur­ing human­i­tar­i­an relief mis­sions in the after­math of hur­ri­canes Kat­ri­na and Rita, Geren said, as well as help­ing fight for­est fires and patrol America’s bor­ders.

“We are one Army; the active com­po­nent can­not go to war with­out the reserve com­po­nent,” he said.

The cur­rent Army bud­get pro­pos­al address­es the trans­for­ma­tion of the reserve com­po­nents into an oper­a­tional reserve. The new Army bud­get, which con­tains $5.6 bil­lion for new Guard equip­ment and $1.4 bil­lion for reserve equip­ment, con­tin­ues a pat­tern of steady invest­ment for the reserve com­po­nents, Geren said. To illus­trate, he not­ed that the Nation­al Guard pos­sessed 290 trucks of mod­ern design in 2001. Today, the Guard has more than 9,000 such trucks. Today’s Nation­al Guard force also has more than 82,000 mod­ern tac­ti­cal radios, Geren said, which is dou­ble the num­ber of such radios it had in 2001.

And, over the next 24 months, Geren said, $17 bil­lion worth of equip­ment, rep­re­sent­ing more than 400,000 new items, will enter the Nation­al Guard’s inven­to­ry.

Oth­er funds will go to improv­ing care for wound­ed war­riors, and to increase the qual­i­ty of life for sol­diers and their fam­i­lies, Geren said, includ­ing bet­ter bar­racks, hous­ing, health care and fam­i­ly sup­port net­works.

The Army also will con­tin­ue “to grow our knowl­edge and improve the care and treat­ment” of post-trau­mat­ic stress dis­or­der and trau­mat­ic brain injury, Geren said.

The new bud­get also will be used to devel­op trans­for­ma­tion­al war-fight­ing tech­nolo­gies such as armed recon­nais­sance heli­copters, light util­i­ty heli­copters, unmanned aer­i­al- and land-based vehi­cles, and joint car­go air­craft.

Dur­ing today’s tes­ti­mo­ny before the Sen­ate com­mit­tee, Casey not­ed that he told the com­mit­tee in Novem­ber that the Unit­ed States’ mil­i­tary would be involved in “per­sis­tent con­flict” over the next decade.

The next 10 years will wit­ness “pro­tract­ed con­fronta­tion among state, non-state, and indi­vid­ual actors who are increas­ing­ly will­ing to use vio­lence to achieve their polit­i­cal and ide­o­log­i­cal objec­tives,” Casey told com­mit­tee mem­bers. Glob­al trends that like­ly will exac­er­bate this sit­u­a­tion and pro­long this peri­od of unrest include: increased glob­al­iza­tion and tech­nol­o­gy, over­pop­u­la­tion in devel­op­ing coun­tries, com­pe­ti­tion for resources, pro­lif­er­a­tion of weapons of mass destruc­tion, and safe havens for ter­ror­ists in ungoverned areas of the world.

The Army must con­tin­ue to adapt itself to become more agile and expe­di­tionary to con­front such future chal­lenges, Casey point­ed out.

How­ev­er, “the cumu­la­tive effects of the last six-plus years of war have left our Army out of bal­ance (and) con­sumed by the cur­rent fight and unable to do the things that we know we need to do to prop­er­ly sus­tain our all-vol­un­teer force and restore our flex­i­bil­i­ty for an uncer­tain future,” Casey said.

Despite the chal­lenges, today’s Army “remains a huge­ly resilient, pro­fes­sion­al and com­bat-sea­soned force,” Casey said.

To put itself back into bal­ance the Army must sus­tain, pre­pare, reset and trans­form, the gen­er­al said.

“First and fore­most, we must sus­tain our sol­diers, fam­i­lies and Army civil­ians,” Casey said. “They are the heart and soul of this Army and must be sus­tained in a way that rec­og­nizes their qual­i­ty of ser­vice.”

Sec­ond, the Army must con­tin­ue to pro­vide prop­er train­ing, equip­ment and oth­er resources required to defeat ene­mies that they face in Afghanistan, Iraq or any­where else, Casey said.

Third, the Army needs to rest its sol­diers and repair or replace dam­aged or destroyed equip­ment after repeat­ed deploy­ments to dan­ger­ous and harsh envi­ron­ments, Casey said.

“Fre­quent deploy­ments are tak­ing their toll on our sol­diers and their equip­ment,” Casey said. “In my mind, resources for reset are the dif­fer­ence between a hol­low force and a ver­sa­tile force for the future,” he added.

Final­ly, the Army must con­tin­ue to trans­form itself into an agile expe­di­tionary force to meet secu­ri­ty needs of the 21st cen­tu­ry, Casey said.

“For us, trans­for­ma­tion is a holis­tic effort to adapt how we train, mod­ern­ize, devel­op lead­ers, sta­tion forces, and sup­port our sol­diers, fam­i­lies and civil­ians,” he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →