Transition to Afghan Control a Prudent Step, Officials Say

WASHINGTON, Feb. 2, 2012 — A tran­si­tion to Afghan secu­ri­ty lead in the coun­try in 2013 is a pru­dent step, but one that does­n’t change the Decem­ber 2014 dead­line for NATO to end com­bat oper­a­tions in the coun­try, Pen­ta­gon offi­cials said today.

Pen­ta­gon spokesman Navy Capt. John Kir­by ampli­fied on remarks Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta made yes­ter­day on his way to NATO meet­ings in Brus­sels.

In an inter­view with reporters trav­el­ing with him, Panet­ta said the U.S. goal “is to com­plete all of that tran­si­tion in 2013 and then, hope­ful­ly, by mid- to the lat­ter-part of 2013, we’ll be able to make … a tran­si­tion from a com­bat role to a train­ing, advise and assist role.”

The sec­re­tary was speak­ing in broad terms about the process of tran­si­tion in Afghanistan, Kir­by said. Tran­si­tion­ing secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty to the Afghans began last year, when NATO trans­ferred secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty to Afghan secu­ri­ty forces for sev­en areas. Lat­er in the year, Afghan Pres­i­dent Hamid Karzai chose 11 oth­er areas to begin tran­si­tion to Afghan lead. Afghan army and police forces now have lead respon­si­bil­i­ty for more than half the pop­u­la­tion of the coun­try.

But the tran­si­tion is a mul­ti­step process, Kir­by said, and Panet­ta will be dis­cussing that process with NATO allies in Brus­sels today. The final plan about tran­si­tion and the par­tic­u­lars of the process will be decid­ed in May by heads of state at the NATO sum­mit in Chica­go, he added.

“The sec­re­tary was pret­ty clear that he hopes to tran­si­tion at least the lead for com­bat-type mis­sions to Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces ear­li­er than 2014,” Kir­by said. “We real­ly do believe that … the gains we have made on the ground have allowed us to begin these type of con­ver­sa­tions.”

Kir­by stressed that no deploy­ment sched­ules have changed.

The cap­tain said offi­cials watch con­di­tions all the time, and the allies will con­tin­ue to hedge bets to pre­serve as much flex­i­bil­i­ty as pos­si­ble. “The ene­my always gets a vote,” Kir­by said.

The ulti­mate goal is to com­plete tran­si­tion by the end of 2014, but many steps remain before that date, he said, empha­siz­ing that tran­si­tion takes time and is an evo­lu­tion, not a sharp deci­sion point.

“It is a well-rea­soned process,” Kir­by said. “It’s going to be informed by con­di­tions on the ground and opin­ions and judg­ments of oper­a­tional com­man­ders and informed by gen­er­al assess­ment of the per­for­mance and capa­bil­i­ties … of the Afghan forces.”

It’s not too soon for the allies to be dis­cussing the final phas­es of the tran­si­tion, Kir­by said.

“Giv­en the suc­cess we’ve made and the progress that the Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces have made, this is some­thing we need to con­sid­er,” he said. “2014 is not that far away. It would be impru­dent — in fact, I think it would be irre­spon­si­ble — if we and our allies and part­ners were not start­ing to have these dis­cus­sions now.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →