Sharp: Korea Plan Synchronizes Capabilities

SEOUL, South Korea, Sept. 17, 2010 — Though all sys­tems were “go” toward trans­fer­ring wartime oper­a­tional con­trol of forces here to South Korea in 2012, delay­ing that tran­si­tion at the South Kore­an government’s request will enable a broad range of ini­tia­tives to unfold in a more syn­chro­nized way, the top U.S. com­man­der said.

These ini­tia­tives, embod­ied in the new Strate­gic Alliance 2015 agree­ment announced last week, pro­vide “a much more com­pre­hen­sive, com­plete pack­age” to shape the U.S.-South Kore­an alliance for the future, Army Gen. Wal­ter L. “Skip” Sharp, com­man­der of U.S. Forces Korea, Com­bined Forces Com­mand and Unit­ed Nations Com­mand, told Amer­i­can Forces Press Service. 

The new plan cov­ers trans­fer­ring wartime “opcon” –- oper­a­tional con­trol — to South Korea, devel­op­ing new war plans, intro­duc­ing broad­er and more real­is­tic exer­cis­es, review­ing both coun­tries’ mil­i­tary orga­ni­za­tion­al struc­tures and tim­ing the move­ment of U.S. forces south of Seoul and ensur­ing South Kore­an forces are ready, he explained. 

The plan, Sharp said, also will help to iden­ti­fy mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties South Kore­an forces will need in 2015, and to ensure that South Kore­an acqui­si­tion, train­ing and orga­ni­za­tion­al efforts are geared toward achiev­ing them. 

In addi­tion, he said, the plan will estab­lish “bridg­ing capa­bil­i­ties” the U.S. mil­i­tary will con­tin­ue to pro­vide after ini­tial opcon trans­fer, and what both coun­tries will con­tribute for the long term. 

“In the past, ‘opcon’ trans­fer was com­plete­ly focused on just Repub­lic of Korea tak­ing over on 17 April 2012,” Sharp said. “Now, we are try­ing to take and syn­chro­nize all of these things in order to be able to make it that by 2015.”” 

Sharp said he had been con­fi­dent that every­thing was on track to trans­fer wartime oper­a­tional con­trol to South Korea as planned on April 17, 2012. He praised the South Kore­an military’s per­for­mance after the annu­al Key Resolve exer­cise in March, out­lin­ing to Con­gress the final steps need­ed to pre­pare for opcon trans­fer: com­ple­tion of a new bilat­er­al war plan and refine­ments to the com­mand-and-con­trol sys­tem and oth­er processes. 

That was before defin­i­tive proof that North Korea was respon­si­ble for sink­ing the South Kore­an naval ship Cheo­nan on March 26, killing 46 sailors. 

As ten­sions mount­ed on the Kore­an penin­su­la, South Kore­an Pres­i­dent Lee Myung-bak asked Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma in ear­ly June to delay the transition. 

“Pres­i­dent Oba­ma rein­forced that mil­i­tar­i­ly we are ready to do it in 2012, but on behalf of the alliance, he agreed that we would delay it to late 2015,” Sharp said. 

Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates, who sub­se­quent­ly met with South Kore­an Defense Min­is­ter Kim Tae-young, decid­ed to take advan­tage of the addi­tion­al time to move for­ward on a broad scope of oth­er ini­tia­tives, all aimed at strength­en­ing the alliance, Sharp said. 

Gates, Sec­re­tary of State Hillary Rod­ham Clin­ton and their South Kore­an coun­ter­parts agreed to the over­ar­ch­ing con­cepts in the Strate­gic Alliance 2015 plan dur­ing their “2 plus 2” talks here in July, Sharp said. 

The plan, announced last week, lays out the frame­work for these efforts, he said. 

“It’s real­ly a syn­chro­niza­tion of many of the ini­tia­tives that we were going to work on in series, but now we can work on them in par­al­lel and make them syn­chro­nized with the Repub­lic of Korea gain­ing enough capa­bil­i­ty to tru­ly be in con­trol of the warfight by 2015,” the gen­er­al said. 

The plan includes a new mis­sion analy­sis of war plans, Sharp said, to ensure they’re reflec­tive of emerg­ing con­di­tions on the Kore­an peninsula. 

“We are re-look­ing the full range of op plans and mak­ing sure they are very real­is­tic for what we see North Korea doing over the next five years or so,” Sharp said. “We are look­ing at what North Korea has done recent­ly, in the past, and what they are say­ing they are going to do.” 

The plan also will reflect grow­ing capa­bil­i­ties with­in the U.S.-South Kore­an alliance dur­ing the next five years, he said. 

Strate­gic Alliance 2015 also ush­ers in more real­is­tic exer­cise sce­nar­ios. In addi­tion to focus­ing on an all-out attack by North Korea, they’ll incor­po­rate sce­nar­ios of involv­ing low­er-lev­el provo­ca­tions, and the cri­sis man­age­ment process­es need­ed to deal with them, Sharp said. 

And build­ing on lessons learned in Iraq and Afghanistan, the exer­cis­es will rein­force non­com­bat as well as com­bat skills, he added. 

“We are incor­po­rat­ing as part of the exer­cis­es the full range of what sol­diers and all ser­vice­mem­bers will have to be able to do in the future, from the full kinet­ic to sta­bi­liza­tion and recon­struc­tion,” Sharp said. 

Mean­while, both the South Kore­an and U.S. mil­i­taries are review­ing their orga­ni­za­tion­al struc­tures to ensure they’re ful­ly pre­pared to reverse the cur­rent sup­port­ing-sup­port­ed con­struct in 2015. At the same time, U.S. Forces Korea is work­ing to ensure a smooth move­ment of its troops south of the South Kore­an cap­i­tal of Seoul on a timetable that sup­ports oth­er ini­tia­tives under way. 

“We are tak­ing a look to deter­mine the syn­chro­niza­tion of our move from [U.S. Army Gar­ri­son] Yongsan and the 2nd Infantry Divi­sion down to Camp Humphreys,” Sharp said. “We want to syn­chro­nize the move for when it makes sense, for when we are going through the orga­ni­za­tion­al changes to be pre­pared after 2015, when [the South Kore­an joint chiefs of staff become] the leader in the warfight.” 

Sharp acknowl­edged that the Unit­ed States will con­tin­ue to pro­vide “bridg­ing capa­bil­i­ties” for a lim­it­ed peri­od after ini­tial opcon trans­fer, but said the Strate­gic Alliance 2015 agree­ment also will look longer-term. 

“What capa­bil­i­ties do we main­tain here for a peri­od of time past opcon trans­fer?” he said. “And then, what do both coun­tries look at for the endur­ing capa­bil­i­ties we will always bring to the alliance as long as there is a North Kore­an threat?” 

The next step in the process will take place at the U.S.-Korea Secu­ri­ty Con­sul­ta­tive Meet­ing sched­uled Oct. 7 and 8. Dur­ing that ses­sion, par­tic­i­pants will work through “a much more detailed plan for each of the dif­fer­ent com­po­nents,” lay­ing out tasks and set­ting mile­stones to get the var­i­ous ini­tia­tives syn­chro­nized and on sched­ule for 2015, Sharp said. 

Tes­ti­fy­ing ear­li­er this week before the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, the gen­er­al expressed deep con­fi­dence in the Strate­gic Alliance 2015 plan. 

“Strate­gic Alliance 2015 will enable the Repub­lic of Korea and U.S. forces to suc­cess­ful­ly con­front future secu­ri­ty chal­lenges and set the con­di­tions for last­ing peace in the Kore­an penin­su­la and the region,” Sharp told the com­mit­tee. “The Repub­lic of Korea and the Unit­ed States are more strong­ly unit­ed than ever before to deter North Kore­an provo­ca­tions and aggres­sion, and to defeat them if necessary.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →