Officials Stand Behind U.S. Report on Pakistan Incident

WASHINGTON, Jan. 23, 2012 — U.S. offi­cials stand by their asser­tion that the Nov. 26 attack that result­ed in the deaths of 24 Pak­istani sol­diers was in self-defense, Pen­ta­gon spokesman Navy Capt. John Kir­by said here today.

The Pak­istani mil­i­tary issued a news release on the find­ings of its own inves­ti­ga­tion of the inci­dent, and the Pak­istani state­ment “that it was an unpro­voked attack by Amer­i­can forces is sim­ply false,” Kir­by said.

The Pak­istani asser­tion direct­ly con­tra­dicts the con­clu­sions that U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Stephen A. Clark released Dec. 22 in his inves­ti­ga­tion report.

Clark said U.S. forces act­ed in self-defense and respond­ed with appro­pri­ate force after being fired upon. “We stand 100-per­cent behind the find­ings of the inves­ti­ga­tion that Gen­er­al Clark did,” Kir­by said.

Clark said the inci­dent was a result of inad­e­quate coor­di­na­tion between U.S. and Pak­istani mil­i­tary offi­cers oper­at­ing through the bor­der coor­di­na­tion cen­ter. This includes rely­ing on incor­rect map­ping infor­ma­tion shared with the Pak­istani liai­son offi­cer, which result­ed in a mis­un­der­stand­ing about the true loca­tion of Pak­istani mil­i­tary units. Clark’s inves­ti­ga­tion also con­clud­ed that there were oth­er gaps in infor­ma­tion about the loca­tions and activ­i­ties of units on both sides of the bor­der.

U.S. offi­cials invit­ed the Pak­istani mil­i­tary to be part of the Clark inves­ti­ga­tion, but they refused, Kir­by not­ed.

“We said then, and we say again today, that we desired Pak­istani par­tic­i­pa­tion in the inves­ti­ga­tion,” Kir­by said. “We believed it cer­tain­ly would have been more thor­ough if they had par­tic­i­pat­ed, but they decid­ed not to.”

The lack of Pak­istani offi­cials in the Clark inves­ti­ga­tion does not change the U.S. belief in the valid­i­ty of the find­ings of the inves­ti­ga­tion, the cap­tain said.

The Unit­ed States wants to get past the inci­dent and build a good coop­er­a­tive rela­tion­ship with the Pak­istani mil­i­tary, Kir­by said. “We still believe that coor­di­na­tion and com­mu­ni­ca­tion with the Pak­istani mil­i­tary — par­tic­u­lar­ly across that bor­der — remains vital to our suc­cess in Afghanistan,” he added.

Pak­istan has closed sup­ply lines into Afghanistan that run through the coun­try. “We would like to see the gates reopened. It makes sup­ply­ing our troops and coali­tion part­ners eas­i­er,” Kir­by said. “But this is a deci­sion that only Pak­istani offi­cials can make, and we respect that.”

The rela­tion­ship between the Unit­ed States and Pak­istan “is in a tough place” right now, Kir­by acknowl­edged, adding that the two nations must work togeth­er to move beyond the cur­rent dif­fi­cul­ties.

U.S. offi­cials have expressed “deep­est regrets” to the fam­i­lies of those killed in the inci­dent.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →