Official: DOD Improves Posture on ‘Loose Nuke’ Threat

WASHINGTON, March 15, 2012 — Though the Defense Department’s role in nuclear non­pro­lif­er­a­tion cen­ters on dis­man­tling weapons of mass destruc­tion in for­mer Sovi­et Union states, DOD also plans, equips and trains for sce­nar­ios in which ter­ror­ists get their hands on nuclear weapons, the prin­ci­pal deputy assis­tant defense sec­re­tary for glob­al strate­gic affairs said yes­ter­day.

Ken­neth B. Han­del­man tes­ti­fied with col­leagues from the State Depart­ment, the Ener­gy Department’s Nation­al Nuclear Secu­ri­ty Admin­is­tra­tion and the Gov­ern­ment Account­abil­i­ty Office before the Sen­ate Home­land Secu­ri­ty and Gov­ern­men­tal Affairs Committee’s sub­com­mit­tee on over­sight of gov­ern­ment man­age­ment.

The hear­ing focused on inter­a­gency nuclear non­pro­lif­er­a­tion efforts around the world.

For fis­cal 2013, Han­del­man said, Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s bud­get request for the Nunn-Lugar Coop­er­a­tive Threat Reduc­tion Pro­gram, or CTR, is $519 mil­lion, rough­ly $130 mil­lion of which would be devot­ed to nuclear secu­ri­ty-relat­ed activ­i­ties, which he called “tru­ly a gov­ern­men­twide team effort.” CTR is an ini­tia­tive cre­at­ed in 1991 to secure and dis­man­tle weapons of mass destruc­tion and asso­ci­at­ed infra­struc­ture in for­mer Sovi­et Union states.

DOD’s con­tri­bu­tion to the nuclear secu­ri­ty effort “comes pri­mar­i­ly through CTR,” Han­del­man said.

“How­ev­er,” he added, “giv­en DOD’s over­all mis­sion to defend the nation, there’s a whole world of sep­a­rate nuclear-secu­ri­ty activ­i­ties for which my agency plans, equips and trains.”

Such activ­i­ties, he said, “cen­ter on a sce­nario none of us want to con­front; name­ly, what to do when we think the bad guys actu­al­ly have got­ten their hands on real­ly bad things.”

Plan­ning for this type of “loose-nukes” sit­u­a­tion is evolv­ing sub­stan­tial­ly, Han­del­man said, and the watch­word for DOD’s new think­ing focus­es on inte­gra­tion across DOD com­po­nents and across the gov­ern­ment.

“For instance,” he said, “the insta­bil­i­ty or col­lapse of a nuclear-armed state could quick­ly lead to the pro­lif­er­a­tion of nuclear weapons or mate­ri­als well beyond the coun­try of ori­gin and involve mul­ti­ple state and non­state actors as it moves across the globe.”

Today, Han­del­man said, the ser­vices are work­ing to improve DOD’s defen­sive pos­ture against the threat by enhanc­ing the homeland’s pro­tec­tive pos­ture, work­ing with the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty to bet­ter ana­lyze and track ter­ror­ist net­works, iden­ti­fy­ing like­ly paths to pro­lif­er­a­tion, and improv­ing the abil­i­ty to char­ac­ter­ize the source and nature of loose-nuke threats.

“Our work at DOD has focused on how U.S. mil­i­tary units would coor­di­nate with oth­er U.S. agen­cies and with allies and part­ners in the face of such a loose-nuke threat sce­nario,” Han­del­man said.

Han­del­man said the first line of defense in attain­ing glob­al nuclear secu­ri­ty is a group of activ­i­ties in which agen­cies from across the U.S. gov­ern­ment par­tic­i­pate, includ­ing DOD.

Thomas Coun­try­man, assis­tant sec­re­tary of state for inter­na­tion­al secu­ri­ty and non­pro­lif­er­a­tion, described for the pan­el a three-tiered U.S. strat­e­gy — site lev­el, coun­try lev­el and glob­al lev­el — to lock down or remove vul­ner­a­ble nuclear mate­ri­als.

“At the site lev­el,” he said, “we work with oth­er coun­tries to min­i­mize the civil­ian use of high­ly enriched ura­ni­um, to elim­i­nate unneed­ed weapons-usable mate­r­i­al, and to improve secu­ri­ty at spe­cif­ic sites.”

Where site-lev­el assis­tance is inap­pro­pri­ate,” Coun­try­man added, “we coop­er­ate at the coun­try lev­el with for­eign gov­ern­ments to exchange best prac­tices and to demon­strate the safe use of equip­ment.”

At the glob­al lev­el, the assis­tant sec­re­tary said, the Unit­ed States helps to devel­op glob­al ini­tia­tives through the Nuclear Secu­ri­ty Sum­mit process, the Unit­ed Nations and oth­er means to improve nuclear secu­ri­ty around the world.”

One exam­ple is U.S. engage­ment with the Glob­al Ini­tia­tive to Com­bat Nuclear Ter­ror­ism, he added, a part­ner­ship of 83 nations that con­duct activ­i­ties to strength­en plans, poli­cies and inter­op­er­abil­i­ty on the issue of nuclear ter­ror­ism.

The Nation­al Nuclear Secu­ri­ty Admin­is­tra­tion also makes impor­tant con­tri­bu­tions at the site and nation­al lev­els, Anne Har­ring­ton said, includ­ing work­ing with part­ner coun­tries on their nuclear secu­ri­ty cen­ters of excel­lence.

“These cen­ters form an impor­tant net­work that will allow coun­tries and regions to strength­en capa­bil­i­ties to secure facil­i­ties and to deter, detect and inter­dict illic­it traf­fick­ing of nuclear and radi­o­log­i­cal mate­r­i­al,” she said.

The NNSA also holds quar­ter­ly coor­di­na­tion meet­ings with DOD col­leagues at the assis­tant-sec­re­tary lev­el, Har­ring­ton said, “to dis­cuss areas of com­mon inter­est, coor­di­nate on pro­gram ideas and do for­ward plan­ning.”

The Unit­ed States is look­ing for­ward into a glob­al nuclear econ­o­my, she added, one that, despite the inci­dents at the tsuna­mi-dam­aged Fukushi­ma nuclear plant in Japan, will con­tin­ue to expand in terms of use of nuclear pow­er and ura­ni­um com­merce.

“As long as nuclear mate­ri­als exist,” Coun­try­man told the pan­el, “we will have the same need to set the best pos­si­ble exam­ple in the Unit­ed States of secur­ing those mate­ri­als and of shar­ing that capa­bil­i­ty for pro­tec­tion with oth­er coun­tries, moti­vat­ing them to do the same.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →