Northcom Prioritizes Homeland Defense, Cyber, Partners

WASHINGTON, March 13, 2012 — Pri­or­i­ties for U.S. North­ern Com­mand include expand­ing part­ner­ships, keep­ing eyes on air, space, cyber­space, land and sea domains, and out­pac­ing all threats, the North­com and the North Amer­i­can Aero­space Defense Com­mand com­man­der said today.

Army Gen. Charles Jaco­by, Jr., tes­ti­fied before the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee on the fis­cal 2013 defense bud­get request for the first time as North­com com­man­der. North­com was estab­lished after the 9/11 ter­ror­ist attacks to defend­ing the home­land and help civ­il author­i­ties respond to nat­ur­al and oth­er dis­as­ters. Its area of respon­si­bil­i­ty includes Cana­da and Mexico. 

Jaco­by said his pri­or­i­ties include advanc­ing and sus­tain­ing the U.S.-Canada part­ner­ship of NORAD, mon­i­tor­ing the unique and fast-chang­ing domain of the Arc­tic, and tak­ing care of the men and women of Northcom. 

“This past year has been busy. We’ve syn­chro­nized our activ­i­ties with many part­ners and done our part to real­ize effi­cien­cies that we’ve worked through the bud­get process,” Jaco­by told the senators. 

As part of the bud­get, he said, North­com trimmed its work­force by 141 full-time posi­tions this year, and for fis­cal 2013 has request­ed reduc­ing its oper­a­tions and main­te­nance fund­ing by about 6 percent. 

“But with the resources and author­i­ties at hand and main­tain­ing our vig­i­lance,” the gen­er­al added, “we’ll be able to con­tin­ue to defend and sup­port the Amer­i­can people.” 

Out­side its pri­ma­ry home­land defense mis­sion, some of Northcom’s most imme­di­ate con­cerns include cyber secu­ri­ty, transna­tion­al crim­i­nal orga­ni­za­tions that threat­en the Unit­ed States from the bor­der with Mex­i­co, and secu­ri­ty issues that arise from the pre­dict­ed melt­ing of Arc­tic sea ice, open­ing parts of the Arc­tic over the next decade to human activity. 

Northcom’s main respon­si­bil­i­ty in the cyber domain, Jaco­by said, “is con­se­quence man­age­ment in the event of a cat­a­stroph­ic cyber attack on this coun­try. North­com could cer­tain­ly be called upon to pro­vide sup­port to civ­il author­i­ties in the recov­ery. But we think our role is broad­er than that.” 

North­com has “some work to do in defin­ing what [con­sti­tutes] an attack in the cyber domain,” he said. “It’s a very col­lab­o­ra­tive process we’re doing as com­bat­ant com­man­ders along with [the U.S. Strate­gic Com­mand] and its … Cyber Com­mand. That’s a work in progress.” 

Jaco­by said he believes “it will be a mat­ter of pol­i­cy to clear­ly define what is an attack or what isn’t an attack,” and he hopes such a pol­i­cy can be put in place over the next year. 

Until then, Jaco­by said, he con­tin­ues to work close­ly with Cyber Com­mand com­man­der Army Gen. Kei­th Alexan­der “to ensure that we have ample warn­ing to under­stand if there is a cyber­at­tack or mali­cious cyber activ­i­ty that … could com­pro­mise the defense of the homeland.” 

To achieve that end, Jaco­by said, North­com has good coop­er­a­tion across DOD and with part­ners in the Depart­ment of Home­land Security. 

Some aspects of transna­tion­al orga­nized crime are anoth­er pri­or­i­ty for North­com. Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma in July released a strat­e­gy for com­bat­ing such crime, and North­com and the U.S. South­ern Com­mand are the main enti­ties through which the Defense Depart­ment engages in the West­ern Hemisphere. 

The man­date increas­es as more nations ask their own mil­i­taries to take on inter­nal secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ties, Jaco­by said. 

“What we do on the bor­der [with Mex­i­co] as the Depart­ment of Defense is to pro­vide sup­port to the lead agen­cies — the Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­ri­ty, pri­mar­i­ly, and the Jus­tice Department’s orga­ni­za­tions, as well,” he said. “We’re eager to pro­vide that support.” 

Part­ner­ing with U.S. Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion gives sol­diers, sailors, air­men and Marines good train­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties, he added. 

“It is a great rela­tion­ship that’s grown stronger and stronger over time,” Jaco­by said. “Just this month, we’ve con­duct­ed Op[eration] Nim­bus II in the Tuc­son sec­tor, where 1st Armored Divi­sion sol­diers feel they got bet­ter train­ing than they’ve got­ten pri­or to a deploy­ment at any time in the past 10 years.” 

In that oper­a­tion, more than 500 sol­diers from Fort Bliss and Fort Hood in Texas sup­port­ed the U.S. Bor­der Patrol with intel­li­gence and sur­veil­lance assistance. 

“I think it’s crit­i­cal to con­tin­ue to strength­en and expand our part­ner­ships in the North­com head­quar­ters,” Jaco­by said. “We have over 32 agen­cies rep­re­sent­ed there and eight law enforce­ment agen­cies. We’ve nev­er had bet­ter shar­ing of infor­ma­tion across the interagency.” 

Thou­sands of miles north, the Arc­tic is becom­ing an emerg­ing an area of inter­est for Northcom. 

The Navy’s Task Force Cli­mate Change and U.S. sci­ence agen­cies have pre­dict­ed that by 2020 or so, com­mer­cial ships may be able to tran­sit the Arc­tic, where sea ice is in long-term decline. 

The region’s more than 1,000 miles of coast­line and poten­tial sov­er­eign rights to sev­er­al hun­dred thou­sand square miles of ocean gives the Unit­ed States a strong nation­al secu­ri­ty and home­land defense inter­est there. 

“We have an oppor­tu­ni­ty, while we watch the Arc­tic begin to open up, to get ahead of poten­tial secu­ri­ty require­ments,” Jaco­by told the senators. 

To that end, he added, Northcom’s strate­gic frame­work is to work close­ly with the Coast Guard, the U.S. Navy and oth­er part­ners in the depart­ments of Defense and Home­land Secu­ri­ty, and stay close­ly tied to part­ners in Canada. 

Jaco­by said the Defense Depart­ment sup­ports the Con­ven­tion of the Law of the Sea because it would give the Unit­ed States a role in long-term nego­ti­a­tions that will involve the Arc­tic and its resources. 

In 2004, the U.S. Sen­ate For­eign Rela­tions Com­mit­tee rec­om­mend­ed U.S. acces­sion to the treaty in a unan­i­mous vote, but a vote of the entire Sen­ate has not yet tak­en place. The Unit­ed States has signed, but not rat­i­fied the treaty. 

“As the com­man­der respon­si­ble for the Arc­tic,” Jaco­by said, ” … it would be very help­ful to have a seat at the table as we begin the lengthy … process of deter­min­ing [the bound­aries of the] Con­ti­nen­tal Shelf and all the attrib­ut­es of the Arc­tic that com­pet­ing nations will be inter­est­ed in.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →