Mullen Offers 40-Year Perspective on Social, Military Issues

WASHINGTON, Sept. 20, 2011 — As the last month ticks down in a career that began with his grad­u­a­tion from the U.S. Naval Acad­e­my in 1968, Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, today offered his view of how war, peace, soci­ety and the world have changed over those 40-plus years.

He’s seen some of the most sig­nif­i­cant mil­i­tary changes ever dur­ing his tenure as chair­man, he told the audi­ence gath­ered here at the Carnegie Endow­ment for Inter­na­tion­al Peace. 

“This has been a tumul­tuous four years,” the admi­ral said. “I do remem­ber when I took over this job … the state of Iraq; the despair that was there in so many cor­ners, the vec­tor we were on, which was cer­tain­ly head­ed for failure.” 

In con­trast, dur­ing his last trip there a few weeks ago, he flew over Bagh­dad at night with some “Army guys” who served there ear­ly in the con­flict, Mullen said. 

“It looked like a sea of lights, like you were in Las Vegas,” he said. “They’d nev­er seen traf­fic on the streets of Bagh­dad at night, and it was jammed.” 

The turn­around in Iraq will be debat­ed by his­to­ri­ans, Mullen said, but he cred­its two pri­ma­ry mil­i­tary fac­tors: coura­geous lead­ers at the top, and the uni­formed men and women who car­ried out their orders. 

Mullen said his three pri­or­i­ties as chair­man have been the broad­er Mid­dle East, includ­ing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and defeat­ing al-Qai­da; the health of the force; and the rest of the world. 

The best day of his term of chair­man was “the day we got [Osama] bin Laden,” he said. “That also rep­re­sents 30 years of work since ‘Desert One,’ when we failed in the Iran­ian hostage res­cue. And we rebuilt not just our Spe­cial Forces and our spe­cial oper­a­tors, but our military.” 

Blood, sweat, tears and a lot of loss­es have result­ed in an adap­tive force that is the world’s best, the chair­man said. 

“Obvi­ous­ly we’re in the mid­dle of exe­cut­ing a very dif­fi­cult and chal­leng­ing cam­paign in Afghanistan,” he said. 

There has been steady secu­ri­ty progress in that coun­try “since we put 10,000 Marines in Hel­mand in the sum­mer of [2009],” he noted. 

The coun­terin­sur­gency fight in Afghanistan has impli­ca­tions for that entire region, includ­ing Pak­istan, India, Iran, Chi­na and “the ’stans,” he said. 

Respon­si­ble nations need to focus on the entire region, so the sit­u­a­tion there does­n’t dete­ri­o­rate into civ­il war or a failed state with nuclear weapons, Mullen said. 

The Unit­ed States today faces secu­ri­ty chal­lenges dif­fer­ent in both num­ber and nature from those he knew as a young offi­cer serv­ing in Viet­nam, he said. 

“This is not 1990; this is not 1970,” he said. “This is a world that, from my per­spec­tive, still is very, very dangerous.” 

“I talk about two exis­ten­tial threats to the Unit­ed States right now,” he said. “One is obvi­ous­ly the nuclear weapons that exist in Rus­sia; we think that we’ve got that well con­trolled inside the [cur­rent strate­gic arms reduc­tion, or New START] treaty and inside the relationship.” 

The oth­er is cyber attacks, which “I think … actu­al­ly can bring us to our knees,” he added. 

The cyber threat has no bound­aries or rules, and can issue from oth­er nations, non­govern­ment actors � “You pick it,” � but the dan­ger it pos­es war­rants a struc­ture of doc­trine and reg­u­la­tion like that used to con­trol the nuclear threat, he said. 

“We’re a long way from that right now,” he said. 

As the Unit­ed States and Rus­sia reduce their nuclear arse­nals, the tra­di­tion­al nuclear tri­ad of bomber air­craft, land-based mis­siles and bal­lis­tic-mis­sile sub­marines “at some point … becomes very, very expen­sive,” the chair­man said. 

“I think a deci­sion will have to be made in terms of whether we keep the tri­ad or drop it down to a dyad,” Mullen said. 

Mullen said he has worked to strength­en the nation’s mil­i­tary com­mu­ni­ca­tion with Chi­na, and wor­ries that the Unit­ed States and Iran have had no for­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tion since 1979. 

“Even in the dark­est days of the Cold War, we had links to the Sovi­et Union,” he said. “We are not talk­ing to Iran. So we don’t under­stand each oth­er. If some­thing hap­pens, it’s vir­tu­al­ly assured that we won’t get it right, that there will be miscalculations.” 

While the mil­i­tary now uses dif­fer­ent doc­trine to counter dif­fer­ent threats than it did when Mullen began his career, the force today is more capa­ble and more pro­fes­sion­al than he dreamed of then, he said. 

Mullen not­ed that peo­ple who wear the nation’s mil­i­tary uni­forms now make up less than 1 per­cent of the population. 

“Our major units now are on their fourth, fifth or sixth deploy­ments since 2003,” he said. 

While ser­vice mem­bers and their fam­i­lies have been “incred­i­bly resilient,” the chair­man said, the aver­age Amer­i­can has no idea of the depth of stress with which they live. 

While he feels strong­ly that the nation does not need a mil­i­tary draft, the chair­man said, mil­i­tary lead­ers must work to con­nect ser­vice mem­bers with the greater nation. 

“Amer­i­can cit­i­zens are stunned at what we’ve been through,” he said. “I do wor­ry … that over time, our con­nec­tion is erod­ing. I think that’s a very bad out­come for Amer­i­ca; an out­come this democ­ra­cy could not stand — to have its mil­i­tary essen­tial­ly detached from its people.” 

Mullen said he’s seen 18-year-olds enter the mil­i­tary and leave it changed for the better. 

“I believe broad­ly, a cou­ple years of ser­vice — in any capac­i­ty � would be good for our young peo­ple in the coun­try,” the chair­man said. “In neigh­bor­hoods, in com­mu­ni­ties, with the Peace Corps, with the mil­i­tary … some­thing that expos­es them to the broad­er world, and gets [them] a con­nec­tion to the chal­lenges and recog­ni­tion of the opportunities.” 

Mullen said dur­ing his own career, he has relied on the part­ner­ship of Deb­o­rah Mullen, his wife of more than 40. Dur­ing his term as chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he also has relied on his mil­i­tary col­leagues, he added. 

“I have had the great priv­i­lege of lead­ing young men and women who are the best I’ve ever seen,” the chair­man con­clud­ed, “but doing that with a group of four-stars that are excep­tion­al­ly strong. I think we’re in pret­ty good shape.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →