Minister for Defence Stephen Smith on Australia’s troop commitment in Afghanistan

TONY EASTLEY: Fair­fax news­pa­pers are report­ing this morn­ing that Defence Force Chiefs are draw­ing up plans to reduce Australia’s troop com­mit­ment to Afghanistan this year. The report says the Unit­ed States’ over­all com­man­der in Afghanistan, Colonel Jim Creighton, has report­ed­ly argued against a reduc­tion, urg­ing Australia’s Defence Chiefs to recon­sid­er.

To dis­cuss those reports we’re joined in our Can­ber­ra stu­dio by the Defence Min­is­ter Stephen Smith. He’s with Sabra Lane.

SABRA LANE: Mr Smith, wel­come to AM.

STEPHEN SMITH: Plea­sure.

SABRA LANE: First, can I ask you about Tony Abbott’s com­ments? What did you think of those com­ments?

STEPHEN SMITH: When we’re deal­ing with dif­fi­cult and trag­ic cir­cum­stances we all express our­selves dif­fer­ent­ly. I think when we deal with deaths in Afghanistan we have to bear upper­most in mind that this is a blow to the nation, a blow to the Defence Force, but it’s a trag­ic loss for the fam­i­ly.

I don’t believe that any­thing that Mr Abbott said, he intend­ed to cause offence and he’s made that clear. He’s spo­ken to the wid­ow of Jared MacK­in­ney — that’s an appro­pri­ate thing to do. And as Mr Abbott has just said him­self the Aus­tralian pub­lic will make their own deci­sion, their own judge­ment, their own view about the cir­cum­stances which have led to this.

But we all express our­selves dif­fer­ent­ly. We always have to bear in mind that we’re deal­ing with com­plex and dif­fi­cult cir­cum­stances. And these dis­cus­sions will not just be a reminder to Jared MacKinney’s fam­i­ly but to 21 oth­er fam­i­lies includ­ing the fam­i­ly of Richard Atkin­son who the Par­lia­ment gave a mov­ing Con­do­lence Motion to yes­ter­day.

SABRA LANE: Mr Abbott’s reac­tion, once the footage was shown to him yes­ter­day, that ensu­ing silence, some of his col­leagues say that was his Mark Lath­am moment; oth­ers are say­ing that he was gob­s­macked because he con­sid­ered it an ambush. What do you think?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well, I’m not propos­ing to be drawn into a run­ning com­men­tary on this mat­ter.

One of the things I’ve tried very hard to do as Min­is­ter for Defence is to deal with these issues very square­ly as nation­al secu­ri­ty issues which are in the nation­al inter­est, and not get involved in, if you like, par­ty polit­i­cal com­men­tary.

The cir­cum­stances of Jared MacKinney’s death were con­tro­ver­sial at the time. The Chief of the Defence Force and the Chief of Army and I have made sure all of the sug­ges­tions that were made at the time about lack of resources would be exhaus­tive­ly exam­ined in the course of the offi­cial inquiry — that is cur­rent­ly under­way.

The sub­stance of what Major Gen­er­al Cantwell and Colonel Creighton were say­ing in the report­ed remarks were that they did­n’t believe that there was a lack of resources, but in the ter­ri­ble and dif­fi­cult cir­cum­stances of the fog of war often bad things hap­pen.

SABRA LANE: To this report about plans being drawn up to reduce Australia’s troop num­bers in Afghanistan, are those plans being drawn up?

STEPHEN SMITH: I have to say that this report this morn­ing in some of our news­pa­pers came very much as a sur­prise to me, and it came as a sur­prise to the Chief of the Defence Force. I spoke to him this morn­ing, as I often do ear­ly in the morn­ing.

Our con­tri­bu­tion and com­mit­ment to Afghanistan is quite clear. We’ve got on aver­age 1550 Defence Force per­son­nel there, about 700 of those are involved in men­tor­ing and train­ing. We believe we’re on track for our men­tor­ing and train­ing mis­sion to be suc­cess­ful over the next two to four years. But we cer­tain­ly don’t see any drawn-down over the next imme­di­ate peri­od — 12 months to two years. We’re on track to meet, we think, the inter­na­tion­al community’s aspi­ra­tion of a tran­si­tion to Afghan-led secu­ri­ty by 2014.

So frankly this report, which is splashed in a cou­ple of news­pa­pers, was a sur­prise, and we don’t see any basis for it.

SABRA LANE: So did you ask the Chief of the Defence Force, Angus Hous­ton, whether he was draw­ing up plans that you weren’t aware of?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well it was a sur­prise to him, as it was a sur­prise to me. The con­sis­tent advice that the Gov­ern­ment has had from the Chief of the Defence Force is that our com­mit­ment in Afghanistan, on aver­age 1550 troops or per­son­nel, is the right allo­ca­tion of resources to meet our mis­sion in Afghanistan, in par­tic­u­lar and includ­ing our train­ing role.

We need to tran­si­tion to Afghan-led secu­ri­ty lead­er­ship so that we can put the Afghan Secu­ri­ty Forces, Army and Police Force in a posi­tion to man­age their own affairs so that we can tran­si­tion out of Afghanistan. That is the inter­na­tion­al community’s aspi­ra­tion reflect­ed by, most recent­ly, the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force Sum­mit in Lis­bon, which the Prime Min­is­ter and I attend­ed.

SABRA LANE: The NATO com­man­ders have talked about trans­fer­ring con­trol of par­tic­u­lar areas to local Afghan com­man­ders, pos­si­bly start­ing this year around Uruz­gan, the area that Aus­tralian troops are oper­at­ing in. Could it be one of the first areas hand­ed over?

STEPHEN SMITH: At the Lis­bon Sum­mit we agreed that we need­ed to have a tran­si­tion plan to give the Afghan peo­ple, the Afghan nation, the Afghan Secu­ri­ty Forces the capac­i­ty to do that. And in the course of this year we will look at the detail of those tran­si­tion plans, includ­ing as ear­ly as March of this year when NATO and ISAF Defence Min­is­ters will meet in Brus­sels.

But we’ve always made the point, as the sec­re­tary-gen­er­al of NATO has, that we can only make the tran­si­tion on what we call a con­di­tions-based arrange­ment. We can only tran­si­tion when the Afghan forces are in a capac­i­ty to take on that lead­er­ship role.

Now, that will vary in terms of time of tran­si­tion, province by province and indeed loca­tion by loca­tion. We don’t expect to see a tran­si­tion in Uruz­gan Province oth­er than with­in our two to four-year timetable.
Oth­er provinces will tran­si­tion to Afghan secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty ear­li­er than that. And some tran­si­tion will occur as ear­ly as this year. But it can only be con­di­tions-based. It can only be done when the Afghan Nation­al Army and Police Force are in a posi­tion and have the capac­i­ty to do it them­selves, because we don’t want to lose the gains that we have made in recent times, and those gains, as we all know, have been at the cost of 22 Aus­tralian lives.

SABRA LANE: This talk is hap­pen­ing on the back of Defence need­ing to find sav­ings, $20 bil­lion over 10 years. It’s been called upon recent­ly with all these nat­ur­al dis­as­ters. Do you need to find extra mon­ey?

STEPHEN SMITH: Our oper­a­tions in Afghanistan, our oper­a­tions in the Solomon Islands, our oper­a­tions in East Tim­or or indeed our con­tri­bu­tion in Sudan are not deter­mined on the basis of mon­ey; they’re deter­mine on the basis of pur­su­ing our nation­al inter­est, mak­ing sure that our troops, wher­ev­er they are, are ade­quate­ly and appro­pri­ate­ly resourced.

Yes, we have a big Strate­gic Reform Pro­gram, but that will not be allowed to, and will not cut into the allo­ca­tion of our resources and the deci­sions that we make about pro­vid­ing con­tri­bu­tions to peace­keep­ing arrange­ments or Afghanistan, star­ing down inter­na­tion­al ter­ror­ism. So those two issues are sep­a­rate.

We remain very con­fi­dent that we are appro­pri­ate­ly and ade­quate­ly resourc­ing our troops in Afghanistan to do the job that they have been charged to do. And as a coun­try that makes the tenth-largest con­tri­bu­tion to ISAF in Afghanistan, it’s a sig­nif­i­cant con­tri­bu­tion from us.

SABRA LANE: Mr Smith, thanks for your time.

STEPHEN SMITH: Thank you, thanks very much.

Press release
Min­is­te­r­i­al Sup­port and Pub­lic Affairs,
Depart­ment of Defence,
Can­ber­ra, Aus­tralia

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →