Lynn: Energy Strategy Will Help Forces Adapt for Future

WASHINGTON, June 14, 2011 — Deputy Defense Sec­re­tary William J. Lynn III released the department’s new oper­a­tional ener­gy strat­e­gy today, say­ing it is con­sis­tent with efforts to adapt the forces to emerg­ing threats.
Lynn said he and Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates have been con­sis­tent in speak­ing of the need to “bet­ter man­age the defense enter­prise to adapt our forces to emerg­ing threats, and to sus­tain a strong and capa­ble mil­i­tary.”

“Our use of ener­gy cuts across each of these issues,” he said dur­ing a Pen­ta­gon news brief­ing. “It affects mil­i­tary plan­ners, acqui­si­tion man­agers and the warfight­ers alike. The way we build ener­gy into our oper­a­tions is a core part of fight­ing and win­ning the nation’s wars.” 

Lynn released the strat­e­gy dur­ing a brief­ing with Sharon Burke, assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for oper­a­tional ener­gy plans and pro­grams, a posi­tion cre­at­ed after the Qua­dren­ni­al Defense Review last year raised the need for the military’s ener­gy use to be con­sid­ered in oper­a­tional strat­e­gy. Gates and Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma sup­port­ed the idea, and it was signed into law as part of the 2009 Nation­al Defense Autho­riza­tion Act. 

The depart­ment makes up 80 per­cent of the fed­er­al government’s ener­gy use, and 1 per­cent of the nation as a whole, Lynn said. It spent $15 bil­lion on ener­gy last year, 75 per­cent of which was for mil­i­tary oper­a­tions. The department’s gaso­line costs are up 225 per­cent from a decade ago, he added. 

In releas­ing the strat­e­gy, Lynn and Burke said the plan will reduce costs, and also improve mil­i­tary capabilities. 

“Not only does [ener­gy] cost the tax­pay­ers, it costs the warfight­ers,” Lynn said. “Every dol­lar spent on ener­gy use is a dol­lar not spent on oth­er warfight­ing priorities.” 

Lynn said there is “a clear con­nec­tion” between inno­va­tion and ener­gy tech­nol­o­gy and the abil­i­ty to project mil­i­tary pow­er. “Whether deploy­ing and sus­tain­ing forces at the front, or pow­er­ing mis­sion-crit­i­cal facil­i­ties they depend on in the rear,” he said, “every­thing we do, every mis­sion we per­form, requires sig­nif­i­cant amounts of energy.” 

But, he added, “Ensur­ing the forces have the ener­gy they need, when they need it, is not easy.” 

At least 80 per­cent of land con­voys in Afghanistan are for trans­port­ing fuel to warfight­ers, Lynn said. The routes are laced with road­side bombs and prone to ambush, he not­ed, result­ing in 1,100 insur­gent attacks last year. 

“The less ener­gy we need, the more oper­a­tional­ly resilient we will be,” he said. 

The strat­e­gy address­es ener­gy needs as a broad, mil­i­tary chal­lenge and calls for reduc­ing demand, improv­ing effi­cien­cy and low­er­ing costs, Lynn said. “This strat­e­gy is good for the tax­pay­ers and the warfight­ers, and it’s long overdue.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →