Lisbon Summit Will Chart NATO’s 21st Century Course

WASHINGTON, Sept. 14, 2010 — NATO’s roadmap for a new world and its mis­sion in Afghanistan will be the main top­ics of dis­cus­sion when the alliance’s lead­ers gath­er in Lis­bon, Por­tu­gal, in Novem­ber for their annu­al sum­mit, a senior Pen­ta­gon offi­cial said yes­ter­day.

Michele Flournoy, under­sec­re­tary of defense for pol­i­cy, said two “main bas­kets” of issues will be on the table at the sum­mit.

“The first will be revi­tal­iz­ing the alliance for the 21st cen­tu­ry,” she said, “and the sec­ond will be suc­ceed­ing as an alliance in Afghanistan.”

Lead­ers are work­ing on a new strate­gic con­cept to cap­ture NATO’s mis­sions going for­ward, Flournoy said. The last update of the strate­gic con­cept was in 1999. The Unit­ed States also would like to see some changes in the alliance’s infra­struc­ture and orga­ni­za­tion, she added.

“We have a whole series of reform pro­pos­als look­ing at com­mand struc­ture, NATO agen­cies and insti­tu­tions, NATO com­mit­tees and NATO finan­cial reform,” she explained.

Flournoy said she believes that with many in Europe call­ing for cut­backs in the face of the world’s eco­nom­ic sit­u­a­tion, the impe­tus is there to reform the alliance. That, she added, sets the stage for orga­ni­za­tion­al changes that suit the alliance’s oper­a­tional evo­lu­tion.

“There is a down­ward pres­sure to do things more effi­cient­ly,” she said. “Sec­ond­ly, NATO has now had more than a decade of expe­ri­ence in the require­ments to do expe­di­tionary oper­a­tions – to actu­al­ly have your com­mand struc­ture actu­al­ly be able to deploy and employ forces in real-world con­tin­gen­cies.”

The eco­nom­ic and oper­a­tional imper­a­tives mean NATO lead­ers have become seri­ous about reform­ing com­mand struc­ture and stream­lin­ing how the alliance does busi­ness so the alliance is more effi­cient and effec­tive in how it spends its resources.

NATO Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al Anders Fogh Ras­mussen has put forth an ini­tia­tive to pare down the num­ber of NATO com­mit­tees from more than 400 to few­er than 200. Oth­er changes also are in the off­ing, Flournoy said.

“We are tak­ing a look at 14 NATO agen­cies and see­ing if we can con­sol­i­date them to three,” she said. “There is also a very care­ful scrub now of the com­mon fund­ing bud­get for NATO. Again, coun­tries are ask­ing, ‘What am I get­ting for my mon­ey, and are we spend­ing it well?’ That is lead­ing to some seri­ous reform for the first time in a long time.” The Unit­ed States would like to revive the NATO-Rus­sia Coun­cil, Flournoy said. The rela­tion­ship has had its ups and downs, she acknowl­edged, but she added that progress is pos­si­ble in light of cur­rent U.S.-Russian rela­tions. NATO and Rus­sia have many areas in which they can work togeth­er, Flournoy not­ed, such as the effort in Afghanistan, fight­ing ter­ror­ism, bal­lis­tic mis­sile defense and coun­ter­pira­cy.

“We would like to revive the NATO-Rus­sia Coun­cil and make it a much more pro­duc­tive body,” she said. “We’re quite open to that.” Flournoy said she hopes a NATO-Rus­sia Coun­cil meet­ing could take place dur­ing the NATO sum­mit in Lis­bon, but that has not been decid­ed yet.

As they dis­cuss the Afghanistan mis­sion, NATO lead­ers will focus on assess­ing how the alliance is doing, iden­ti­fy­ing mile­stones for progress and keep­ing the cohe­sion of the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force, Flournoy said.

“We are approach­ing 150,000 inter­na­tion­al troops in Afghanistan – about 45,000 are non-Amer­i­can,” Flournoy said. “When we had our plus-up of 30,000 [troops], NATO also stepped up with an addi­tion­al 9,000.”

And while the alliance mem­bers have stepped up in num­bers, a num­ber of the coun­tries are step­ping up in terms of their activ­i­ties, Flournoy said. For exam­ple, the Ger­mans in Region­al Com­mand North are now ful­ly part­nered with the Afghan units and “are oper­at­ing with them, train­ing with them, doing every­thing with them,” she said. “That is a real change, and we’ve seen oth­er coun­tries also step up.”

But prob­lems and short­ages still exist, Flournoy acknowl­edged, with a short­fall in insti­tu­tion­al train­ers and men­tor­ing teams fore­most among them.

“The long pole in the tent here is grow­ing Afghan capac­i­ty in the secu­ri­ty forces,” she said, “and while we are get­ting trac­tion there – espe­cial­ly with the army – the train­ers short­fall must be addressed if we’re going to be in a posi­tion to tran­si­tion to greater Afghan lead for secu­ri­ty.”

The need for police train­ers has slowed the process, the under­sec­re­tary said. Changes in NATO’s train­ing mis­sion in Afghanistan have improved the process, she added, but the police still lag sig­nif­i­cant­ly behind the Afghan army.

Before, she explained, police sim­ply were hired and placed on the streets. They received rudi­men­ta­ry train­ing, if any at all, she said, and they failed spec­tac­u­lar­ly. “Now,” she said, “we are actu­al­ly vet­ting them, we are train­ing them before we put them out in the field, and we are try­ing to part­ner them with units and men­tors so they get on-going pro­fes­sion­al devel­op­ment once they are actu­al­ly in the field.

“We are hear­ing from our infantry and [mil­i­tary police] units in Kan­da­har that when we actu­al­ly part­ner with the Afghan Nation­al Police, they do quite well,” she con­tin­ued. “There is a lot of on-the-job train­ing and devel­op­ment that goes on, [and] a lot of lead­er­ship devel­op­ment, when we are close­ly part­nered 24/7.” The coun­terin­sur­gency strat­e­gy is per­me­at­ing ISAF forces in Afghanistan, Flournoy said.

“Our troops real­ly ‘get’ coun­terin­sur­gency,” she said. “They under­stand it’s not about how well they can do some­thing — it’s about how well the Afghans can, and build­ing the Afghan capac­i­ty and con­fi­dence to be in the lead. That’s what it’s about, so we are doing every­thing we can pos­si­bly do togeth­er.”

Though the Dutch have left Afghanistan and the Cana­di­ans are leav­ing, this is coun­ter­bal­anced by a num­ber of coun­tries that have increased their com­mit­ments, Flournoy said. Still, she acknowl­edged, all of the NATO nations involved in the effort need to show their publics at home some demon­stra­ble progress in Afghanistan by the Lis­bon sum­mit, and even more progress by next sum­mer.

NATO lead­ers also will dis­cuss Koso­vo at the sum­mit, Flournoy said. The alliance still has 9,000 troops in the coun­try, she added, and over­all, the mis­sion is pro­gress­ing well. “The Unit­ed States is empha­siz­ing train­ing local secu­ri­ty forces to even­tu­al­ly be in a posi­tion to take the lead on secu­ri­ty,” she said. “The prin­ci­ple that we are oper­at­ing under is ‘in togeth­er, out togeth­er.’ Any deci­sions toward the next gate and some reduc­tion of forces will be made togeth­er as an alliance, rather than indi­vid­ual troop-con­tribut­ing nations.”

Mis­sile defense is anoth­er pri­or­i­ty for NATO in Lis­bon, Flournoy said, and the Unit­ed States hopes the alliance will embrace mis­sile defense as a mis­sion. NATO would need to con­tribute a com­mand and con­trol sys­tem, with indi­vid­ual coun­tries con­tribut­ing var­i­ous capa­bil­i­ties, she said.

The defens­es would be focused on the threat from Iran and would in no way be aimed at Rus­sia, the under­sec­re­tary empha­sized. U.S. offi­cials hope that Rus­sia embraces the sys­tem, she added, as Russ­ian radars would be par­tic­u­lar­ly help­ful.

“We would wel­come Russ­ian par­tic­i­pa­tion, but we have some work to do to con­vince them that it makes sense for them,” Flournoy said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →