Guard Should Remain an Operational Reserve, Leaders Say

WASHINGTON, April 7, 2011 — As part of the Total Force, the Nation­al Guard has suc­cess­ful­ly trans­formed into an oper­a­tional force and must not be put back on the shelf in a strate­gic reserve sta­tus, the chief of the Nation­al Guard Bureau said here last week.
“We must con­tin­ue to be uti­lized as part of the oper­a­tional force … and must main­tain readi­ness and con­tin­ue to be a part of the nation­al secu­ri­ty frame­work,” Air Force Gen. Craig R. McKin­ley said dur­ing his tes­ti­mo­ny before the House Appro­pri­a­tions Sub­com­mit­tee on Defense, March 30.

McKin­ley, along with Air Force Lt. Gen. Har­ry M. Wyatt III, direc­tor of the Air Nation­al Guard; Army Maj. Gen. Ray­mond W. Car­pen­ter, act­ing direc­tor of the Army Nation­al Guard; and Army Lt. Gen. Jack C. Stultz, chief of the Army Reserve and com­mand­ing gen­er­al, U.S. Army Reserve; spoke about the impor­tant roles the Nation­al Guard and reserve have per­formed dur­ing the last decade.

McKin­ley said remain­ing a ful­ly oper­a­tional force relies on the ser­vice com­po­nents’ will­ing­ness to keep the Air and Army Nation­al Guard oper­a­tional.

“I believe very strong­ly that [Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen.] Nor­ton Schwartz and [Chief of Staff of the Army Gen.] George Casey believe that access and avail­abil­i­ty to call on the Guard is vital to their future, espe­cial­ly in an era of per­sis­tent con­flict,” he said.

“From a strate­gic van­tage point, we in the Nation­al Guard believe that care must be tak­en not to break this mag­nif­i­cent force that has been there when need­ed these last 10 years,” McKin­ley said.

“We have proven that this reserve com­po­nent can be an oper­a­tional force. We have demon­strat­ed the capa­bil­i­ties,” Stultz said. “We have demon­strat­ed the fact that we are a good return on invest­ment.”

That return on invest­ment, he added, can be seen in all reserve com­po­nent branch­es.

“We have cre­at­ed an Army that has to have an oper­a­tional reserve,” Stultz said. “Just in raw num­bers, 75 per­cent of your engi­neer­ing capa­bil­i­ties … 80 per­cent of your logis­tics capa­bil­i­ty … 75 per­cent of your med­ical capa­bil­i­ty … and 85 of your civ­il affairs capa­bil­i­ty, which is in high demand, is in the reserve or Guard.”

Wyatt said the Air Guard pro­vides a high per­cent­age of Air Force mis­sion capa­bil­i­ty rel­a­tive to the total bud­get the Air Force pro­vides to the Air Guard.

“The Air Nation­al Guard pro­vides about 34 per­cent of the total capa­bil­i­ty of the Air Force on about 7 per­cent of the bud­get,” Wyatt said. “That’s prob­a­bly the most cost-effec­tive arm of the Air Force that we have.”

Wyatt said one of the biggest issues the Air Nation­al Guard faces in remain­ing a rel­e­vant oper­a­tional force is the recap­i­tal­iza­tion of old­er air­craft.

“That’s the same prob­lem that the Unit­ed States Air Force has,” he said. “Our goal is to con­tin­ue to be an equal part­ner through the Air Force’s recap­i­tal­iza­tion and mod­ern­iza­tion process.

“The prop­er way to do that when recap­i­tal­iz­ing the Air Force, Wyatt con­tin­ued, “is to embark upon recap­i­tal­iz­ing the Air Nation­al Guard at the same time that we do our active com­po­nent pro­por­tion­ate­ly and bal­anced across all three of the com­po­nents so that the Air Nation­al Guard can remain rel­e­vant and remain an oper­a­tional force.”

To pre­pare for the future, the Air Nation­al Guard must build upon the lessons of the past, he said.

“Today’s Air Nation­al Guard inte­grates seam­less­ly into the Air Force glob­al oper­a­tions because we have the same equip­ment with sim­i­lar capa­bil­i­ties and Air Guard air­men main­tain the same stan­dards of train­ing and edu­ca­tion as our active duty broth­ers and sis­ters,” Wyatt said.

“With con­tin­ued sup­port from Con­gress,” he added, “we will con­tin­ue to improve and enhance our abil­i­ty to sup­port civ­il author­i­ties through pru­dent invest­ments and dual-use capa­bil­i­ties.”

McKin­ley broke down some of the fis­cal year 2012 require­ments the Guard is look­ing for.

“Over­all, we can say that the bud­get request for fis­cal year 2012 meets the crit­i­cal needs of the Army and the Air Nation­al Guard in the era of per­sis­tent con­flict over­seas and on-going threats to Amer­i­can lives and prop­er­ty here in the home­land,” he said.

“As the FY12 bud­get was devel­oped,” McKin­ley added, “we worked close­ly with [the Office of the Sec­re­tary of Defense] to ensure ade­quate fund­ing for the entire [Chem­i­cal, Bio­log­i­cal, Radi­o­log­i­cal, Nuclear and high-yield Explo­sives] enter­prise, includ­ing stand­ing up the remain­ing eight new Home­land Response Forces.”

Car­pen­ter said sol­dier resilien­cy also is vital to the con­tin­u­a­tion of the oper­a­tional force and the Army Nation­al Guard looks to achieve this through com­pre­hen­sive sol­dier men­tal health ini­tia­tives and sol­dier and fam­i­ly out­reach pro­grams.

Car­pen­ter empha­sized the impor­tance of keep­ing the Guard and Reserve oper­a­tional.

“Gen­er­al Casey has made the state­ments, ‘We’ve served togeth­er, we’ve bled togeth­er and we can’t go back’,” Car­pen­ter said. “We have to be ready, we can­not sit back and wait for some­thing and then respond, so from that stand­point the oper­a­tional Reserve is crit­i­cal for this nation.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →