General Calls Iraq Operations ‘Worth It’ in Final News Briefing

WASHINGTON, Dec. 7, 2011 — As the final U.S. mil­i­tary con­voys roll out of Iraq these next three weeks, mark­ing the end of eight years of oper­a­tions, Amer­i­cans can be proud of the work ser­vice mem­bers did there, U.S. Forces Iraq’s deputy com­mand­ing gen­er­al said today.

In USFI’s final news brief­ing from Bagh­dad, Army Lt. Gen. Frank G. Helmick told the Pen­ta­gon press corps that Amer­i­cans and Iraqis will have dif­fer­ent opin­ions about whether Oper­a­tions Iraqi Free­dom and New Dawn “were worth it.”

“From where I sit, it was,” Helmick said.

It was because of the U.S. mil­i­tary role that the coun­try held his­toric elec­tions in March 2010, giv­ing Iraq “the oppor­tu­ni­ty for a sov­er­eign future,” the gen­er­al said. And, he added, vio­lence is at an eight-year low.

Helmick said his beliefs are under­scored by the pos­i­tive com­ments of some wound­ed war­riors and fam­i­ly mem­bers of the fall­en, which totals more than 4,500 U.S. ser­vice members.

“My firm belief is that there is no oth­er mil­i­tary in the world that can do what yours did in Iraq,” he said. “For eight years, they have been build­ing and secur­ing this country.”

U.S. troops’ great­est lega­cy in Iraq, Helmick said, is in the pro­fes­sion­al­ism, con­fi­dence and esprit de corps of the Iraqi secu­ri­ty forces.

“We gave 28 mil­lion Iraqis the great­est gift any­one can give and that is their free­dom,” he said.

Helmick marked the his­toric occa­sion by call­ing the vet­er­ans of Iraq oper­a­tions the next “Great­est Gen­er­a­tion,” a ref­er­ence to those who served in World War II.

“The sig­nif­i­cance of this day does­n’t escape me,” the gen­er­al said on the 70th anniver­sary of the Japan­ese attack on Pearl Har­bor, Hawaii. For their ser­vice in Iraq, he said, “Amer­i­ca dis­cov­ered the next great­est generation.”

“Words can­not begin to express the pride I feel about America’s mil­i­tary per­for­mance and ser­vice in Iraq,” he added.

The 18-month process of draw­ing down forces in Iraq “is sim­ply his­toric,” going from 300,000 ser­vice mem­bers and more than 5,000 instal­la­tions in 2007 to 8,000 troops and five bases today, Helmick said. Mil­i­tary dri­vers have logged 16 mil­lion miles, “mov­ing a moun­tain of equip­ment and per­son­nel,” most­ly through south­ern Iraq and into Kuwait, and have few­er than 1,000 truck­loads left, he said.

U.S. forces built the Iraqi secu­ri­ty forces to more than 700,000, trained them, and left them with “some of the best [equip­ment] we have,” includ­ing the M1 Abrams tank and artillery equip­ment, the gen­er­al said. U.S. forces also were in charge of the country’s secu­ri­ty until 2010 when Iraqi forces took the lead.

Every piece of U.S. mil­i­tary equip­ment “goes through an ago­niz­ing process” of deter­min­ing whether it should be shipped out of the coun­try or left for the Iraqis, Helmick said. The U.S. mil­i­tary has incurred sig­nif­i­cant sav­ings in trans­porta­tion costs by leav­ing equip­ment, name­ly office fur­ni­ture, in Iraq, he said.

Iraq still has chal­lenges, Helmick said, includ­ing con­tin­ued threats from al-Qai­da and oth­er ter­ror­ist groups, Iran­ian med­dling, and inter­nal eth­nic tensions.

Iraq has made good progress on police work, the gen­er­al said, and is capa­ble of secur­ing the coun­try inter­nal­ly, if not externally. 

The Iraqis under­stand they have a secu­ri­ty gap if some­one comes into their air space who does­n’t want to be seen,” he said.

Whether or not the Iraqis choose a future U.S. mil­i­tary role in secu­ri­ty is up to them, the gen­er­al said.

“The sense I get from the Iraqis is that they want to have a strong rela­tion­ship with our coun­try,” he said.

Asked about the military’s “lessons learned” in Iraq, Helmick said, “We per­formed, real­ly, beyond expectations.”

Ear­ly on, the gen­er­al said, ser­vice mem­bers in Iraq had to do things they weren’t nec­es­sar­i­ly trained to do. They weren’t very good at advis­ing Iraqi farm­ers on wheat crops, “but we did that,” or in help­ing with the oil refin­ery and dis­tri­b­u­tion process­es, “but we did that,” he said.

“The mil­i­tary had to branch out through all the dif­fer­ent por­tions of the gov­ern­ment sec­tor because, at that time, there was no one to pass the ball off to,” Helmick said.

U.S. oper­a­tions in Iraq lat­er became the exam­ple of how best to syn­chro­nize mil­i­tary and civil­ian actions, Helmick said. Amer­i­cans serv­ing in Iraq learned about the country’s cul­ture and enabled the Iraqis to cre­ate a sys­tem of secu­ri­ty and gov­er­nance for them­selves, he said, rather than a tem­plate of how things are done in the Unit­ed States.

As for Iraq’s future secu­ri­ty, Helmick said, “We real­ly don’t know what is going to hap­pen, but we know we’ve done every­thing we can for the Iraqi secu­ri­ty forces.”

Asked if the Iraqis are capa­ble of doing their part to keep U.S. State Depart­ment employ­ees and con­trac­tors safe when they take over the U.S. role there Jan. 1, the gen­er­al said, “My gut tells me they will be capa­ble to do this — they’re doing it today.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →