Gates Urges Protection of Modernization Funding

WASHINGTON, May 24, 2011 — As the nation tight­ens its finan­cial belt — with defense expect­ed to bear much of the brunt — mod­ern­iza­tion will be essen­tial if the mil­i­tary is to main­tain crit­i­cal capa­bil­i­ties, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said here today.

In what he said would be his last major pol­i­cy speech in the nation’s cap­i­tal as his June 30 retire­ment nears, Gates told an audi­ence at the Amer­i­can Enter­prise Insti­tute that ques­tion­able mod­ern­iza­tion pro­grams already have been cut.

“We can­celled or cur­tailed mod­ern­iza­tion pro­grams that were egre­gious­ly over-bud­get, behind sched­ule, depen­dent on unproven tech­nol­o­gy, sup­plied a niche require­ment that could be met in oth­er ways, or that sim­ply did not pass the com­mon sense test,” he said.

But oth­er mod­ern­iza­tion needs – in air supe­ri­or­i­ty and mobil­i­ty, long-range strike, nuclear deter­rence, mar­itime access, space and cyber war­fare, and intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance – are “absolute­ly crit­i­cal,” he added.

“We need to build a new [aer­i­al refu­el­ing] tanker,” he said. “The ones we have are twice as old as some of the pilots fly­ing them.” The nation must field the F‑35 joint strike fight­er at a cost that per­mits large enough num­bers to replace the cur­rent fight­er inven­to­ry and main­tain a healthy mar­gin of supe­ri­or­i­ty over the Rus­sians and Chi­nese, he said.

Not­ing that the size of the Navy fleet has sunk to the low­est lev­el since before World War II and will get small­er as more ves­sels reach the end of their ser­vice life, the sec­re­tary stressed the need to build more ships. After a decade of war that has tak­en a toll on vehi­cles and heli­copters, he said, the nation must recap­i­tal­ize its ground forces, and at some point must replace its bal­lis­tic mis­sile sub­marines.

“The Rea­gan build-up of the 1980s field­ed a new gen­er­a­tion of weapons plat­forms that con­tin­ue to be the main­stay of the force today – the M1 tank, Bradley fight­ing vehi­cle, Apache and Black Hawk heli­copters, Burke guid­ed-mis­sile destroy­ers, F‑15 fight­ers, and much more,” Gates said. “In con­trast, the 1990s rep­re­sent­ed basi­cal­ly a pro­cure­ment hol­i­day, except for impor­tant devel­op­ments in pre­ci­sion muni­tions and [unmanned aer­i­al vehi­cles]. And … the post‑9/11 defense spend­ing surge result­ed in rel­a­tive­ly lit­tle new recap­i­tal­iza­tion of the force.

“The cur­rent inven­to­ry is get­ting old and worn down from Iraq and Afghanistan,’ he con­tin­ued. “Some equip­ment can be refur­bished with life-exten­sion pro­grams, but there is no get­ting around the fact that oth­ers must be replaced.”

Most of plat­forms still are “best in class” rel­a­tive to the rest of the world, the sec­re­tary said.

“So with the impor­tant excep­tion of air supe­ri­or­i­ty fight­ers and oth­er high-end sys­tems,” he said, “pur­su­ing cost­ly, leap-ahead improve­ments in tech­nol­o­gy and capa­bil­i­ty is not nec­es­sar­i­ly required. Our guid­ing prin­ci­ple going for­ward must be to devel­op tech­nol­o­gy and field weapons that are afford­able, ver­sa­tile, and rel­e­vant to the most like­ly and lethal threats in the decades to come, not just more expen­sive and exot­ic ver­sions of what we had in the past.”

Gates point­ed out that although the Pentagon’s mod­ern­iza­tion accounts near­ly dou­bled after the Sept. 11, 2001, ter­ror­ist attacks on the Unit­ed States – with more than $700 bil­lion over 10 years in new pro­cure­ment, research and devel­op­ment spend­ing – only mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties gained only mod­est­ly.

In fact, he said, most of the sig­nif­i­cant new capa­bil­i­ties that have come online over the past decade were large­ly paid for out­side the base bud­get, via sup­ple­men­tal war requests — in par­tic­u­lar, larg­er ground forces and spe­cial­ized bat­tle­field equip­ment such as [mine-resis­tant, ambush-pro­tect­ed vehi­cles], body armor and oth­er gear.

The mil­i­tary needs to mod­ern­ize, Gates said, but fis­cal real­i­ty dic­tates that it do so intel­li­gent­ly.

“Revers­ing an unsus­tain­able course – where more and more mon­ey is con­sumed by few­er and few­er plat­forms that take longer and longer to build – meant reform­ing the acqui­si­tion process and the department’s buy­ing cul­ture,” the sec­re­tary said. “The goal is that any new weapons sys­tem should meet bench­marks for cost, sched­ule and per­for­mance while min­i­miz­ing ‘require­ments creep’ – the kind of indis­ci­pline that leads to $25 mil­lion how­itzers, $500 mil­lion heli­copters, $2 bil­lion bombers, and $7 bil­lion sub­marines.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →