DOD, Services Work to Prevent Suicides

WASHINGTON — Offi­cials know the facts about sui­cide in the mil­i­tary ser­vices, but the caus­es and best means of pre­ven­tion are more elu­sive, a senior Defense Depart­ment offi­cial said today.

In tes­ti­mo­ny before the House Armed Ser­vices com­mit­tee, Dr. Jonathan Wood­son, the assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for health affairs and direc­tor of the TRICARE Man­age­ment Activ­i­ty, said DOD has invest­ed “tremen­dous resources” to bet­ter under­stand how to iden­ti­fy those at risk of sui­cide, treat at-risk peo­ple, and pre­vent suicide. 

“We con­tin­ue to seek the best minds from both with­in our ranks, from acad­e­mia, oth­er fed­er­al health part­ners, and the pri­vate sec­tor to fur­ther our under­stand­ing of this com­plex set of issues,” Wood­son said. 

The over­all rate of sui­cide among ser­vice mem­bers has risen steadi­ly for a decade, he said, and DOD and the ser­vices are tak­ing a mul­ti­dis­ci­pli­nary approach in their efforts to save lives. 

The Defense and Vet­er­ans Affairs Depart­ments are devel­op­ing shared clin­i­cal prac­tice guide­lines that health care providers in both agen­cies will use to assess sui­cide risk and help pre­vent sui­cide attempts, Wood­son said. 

DOD also is work­ing with the Depart­ment of Health and Human Ser­vices and the Sub­stance Abuse and Men­tal Health Ser­vices Admin­is­tra­tion to offer crit­i­cal men­tal health ser­vices to Nation­al Guard and Reserve mem­bers, who often don’t live close to mil­i­tary med­ical facil­i­ties, he added. 

Wood­son acknowl­edged much work remains. 

“We have iden­ti­fied risk fac­tors for sui­cide, and fac­tors that appear to pro­tect an indi­vid­ual from sui­cide,” he said. “As you well under­stand, the inter­play of these fac­tors is very com­plex. Our efforts are focused on address­ing solu­tions in a com­pre­hen­sive and holis­tic manner.” 

Defense sui­cide pre­ven­tion research includes Army ‘STARS,’ a study to assess risk and resilience in ser­vice mem­bers, Wood­son said. 

“This is the largest sin­gle epi­demi­o­log­ic research effort ever under­tak­en by the Army, and is designed to exam­ine men­tal health, psy­cho­log­i­cal resilience, sui­cide risk, sui­cide-relat­ed behav­iors and sui­cide deaths,” the assis­tant sec­re­tary said. 

The study, he said, involves experts from the Uni­form Ser­vices Uni­ver­si­ty of the Health Sci­ences, Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia, Uni­ver­si­ty of Michi­gan, Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty, and the Nation­al Insti­tute of Men­tal Health. 

STARS is exam­in­ing past data on about 90,000 active-duty sol­diers, eval­u­at­ing sol­diers’ char­ac­ter­is­tics and expe­ri­ences as they relate to sub­se­quent psy­cho­log­i­cal health issues, sui­ci­dal behav­ior and oth­er rel­e­vant out­comes, he said. 

DOD has added more than 200 men­tal health pro­fes­sion­als from the Pub­lic Health Ser­vice to med­ical facil­i­ties’ staffs, and is expand­ing access to ser­vices in civil­ian com­mu­ni­ties, Wood­son said. 

“With­in the depart­ment, we have amend­ed med­ical doc­trine and embed­ded our men­tal health pro­fes­sion­als far for­ward … to pro­vide care in the­aters of oper­a­tion,” he added. 

The depart­ment also has worked to col­lect, ana­lyze and share data more effec­tive­ly “so that the entire care team under­stands the diag­no­sis and treat­ment plan,” he said. 

“As impor­tant as any step, we have also made great attempts to remove stig­ma from seek­ing men­tal health ser­vices, a stig­ma that is com­mon through­out soci­ety, and not just in the mil­i­tary,” Wood­son con­tin­ued. “This is a long-term effort, but both senior offi­cers and enlist­ed lead­ers are speak­ing out with a com­mon message.” 

Defense lead­ers are encour­aged that ser­vice mem­bers increas­ing­ly now seek pro­fes­sion­al help when it is rec­om­mend­ed, he said. 

The ser­vice chiefs of staff for per­son­nel also tes­ti­fied at today’s hear­ing:
Army Maj. Gen. Thomas Bostick, Navy Rear Adm. Antho­ny Kur­ta, Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Robert Mil­stead Jr., and Air Force Lt. Gen. Dar­rell Jones. 

The strain of decade-long war is wear­ing on sol­diers and their fam­i­lies, Bostick said. 

“The most-trag­ic indi­ca­tor of this stress is the his­tor­i­cal­ly high num­ber of sui­cides that we have expe­ri­enced in recent years,” he said. 

The past year has seen a slight decrease in sui­cide inci­dence among active-duty sol­diers, which offi­cials cred­it to pro­grams and pol­i­cy changes that began in March 2009, Bostick said. 

Army research shows those pro­grams help mit­i­gate stress for active-duty troops, but reserve com­po­nent sol­diers don’t have access to the same sup­port net­works or the over­sight of as full-time chain of com­mand, he said. 

“This is a com­plex prob­lem; it has no sim­ple solu­tion,” Bostick said. 

DOD and Army lead­ers are work­ing “to bet­ter under­stand the prob­lem, and then to get the lead­er­ship involved at every lev­el in what we learn from those con­ver­sa­tions, what we learn from our month­ly reviews of these sui­cides,” he said. 

Navy sui­cide rates declined from 2009 to 2010, but the cur­rent rate shows an increase over last year, Kur­ta said. 

The Navy’s sui­cide pre­ven­tion pro­grams com­bine stress con­trol, psy­cho­log­i­cal health out­reach to Reserve sailors, health pro­mo­tion and fam­i­ly readi­ness, Kur­ta said. 

“We view sui­cide pre­ven­tion as an all-hands-on, all-of-the-time effort,” he said. “It involves sailors, fam­i­ly mem­bers, peers, and leadership.” 

Kur­ta cit­ed the Navy’s Coali­tion Of Sailors Against Destruc­tive Deci­sions, a peer-to-peer men­tor­ing pro­gram that “empow­ers our most-junior sailors to make respon­si­ble deci­sions and to reach out to their ship­mates in need.” 

The pro­gram now includes 200 chap­ters across the Navy, he added. 

Mil­stead said the Marines saw a near­ly 30-per­cent decrease in sui­cides dur­ing 2010, from 52 to 37, and num­bers so far this year are still lower. 

Marine Corps offi­cials hope the down­ward trend con­tin­ues, but will con­tin­ue to aggres­sive­ly improve sui­cide pre­ven­tion pro­grams at all lev­els and focused on encour­ag­ing ser­vice mem­bers to seek help ear­ly, he said. 

“As Marines, we pride our­selves on tak­ing care of our own,” Mil­stead said. “A Marine strug­gling emo­tion­al­ly is a wound­ed com­rade, and we don’t leave our wound­ed on the battlefield.” 

He said the Marines found that the “leader-to-led ratio” before, and more crit­i­cal­ly after, a deploy­ment could affect sui­cide attempts. 

“We quick­ly dis­cov­ered that it was on the back­side of that deploy­ment where it was even more impor­tant, as we’ve come to call ‘the dark side,’ for at least 90 days when a young Marine returns from a deploy­ment and [has] to dance with some drag­ons of things that he’s seen,” Mil­stead said. 

Jones said the Air Force total strength includes 693,000 uni­formed and civil­ian mem­bers. This year, 56 of them — offi­cer, enlist­ed and civil­ian — have tak­en their own lives, he said. 

“Although that num­ber of sui­cides is low­er than the same peri­od last year, it is still a major area of con­cern for our force, as it sends rip­ples across the fam­i­ly, the unit and the com­mu­ni­ty,” he said. 

Air Force offi­cials have “redou­bled” post-sui­cide care at the unit lev­el and enlist­ed the aid of health care pro­fes­sion­als to devel­op a com­pre­hen­sive guide to help lead­ers respond to sui­cides with­in their ranks, Jones said. 

“We are keen­ly aware that a proac­tive response by unit lead­er­ship plays a role in pre­ven­tion of addi­tion­al sui­cides and attempts,” he said. 

The Air Force recent­ly devel­oped the Com­pre­hen­sive Air­men Fit­ness pro­gram, focused on bol­ster­ing phys­i­cal, men­tal, spir­i­tu­al and social fit­ness, Jones said. 

“We know that as soci­ety changes, so do our air­men, and it is impor­tant that our strate­gies for being resilient air­men con­tin­ue to be as resilient and as flex­i­ble as our force,” he added. 

Wood­son said while DOD and the ser­vices have a num­ber of sui­cide pre­ven­tion pro­grams in place, it’s crit­i­cal to devel­op mea­sures show­ing which pro­grams are most effective. 

“One of the things we have to real­ly be care­ful [about] in a resource-con­strained envi­ron­ment is that we don’t fund pro­grams that are not effec­tive, and [also don’t] allow oth­ers that would be effec­tive to with­er on the vine,” he said. 

Some approach­es have been proven effec­tive, Wood­son said. Ser­vice mem­bers in cus­tody fol­low­ing legal dif­fi­cul­ty are at high­er sui­cide risk, so eval­u­at­ing that risk is impor­tant. Also, peer-to-peer pro­grams seem to work, as does access to high-qual­i­ty men­tal health care by pro­fes­sion­als expe­ri­enced in eval­u­at­ing and treat­ing sui­cide risk, he said. 

DOD’s strat­e­gy is to place men­tal health spe­cial­ists adept in screen­ing for sui­cide risk with­in mil­i­tary units, and ensure “high-end spe­cial­ists” can then fol­low up to treat more com­plex prob­lems, Wood­son said. 

“It’s not only a ques­tion of num­bers; it’s a ques­tion of the right dis­tri­b­u­tion of spe­cial­ists to make sure we get the job done,” he said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →