DOD Civilians Assist Afghan Defense Agencies

WASHINGTON, June 7, 2011 — Civil­ians who work for the Defense Depart­ment are on the ground in Afghanistan, col­lab­o­rat­ing with coun­ter­parts there to build effec­tive defense insti­tu­tions, a defense offi­cial who heads the pro­gram said yes­ter­day.
Kel­ly Uribe, who directs the two-year Min­istry of Defense Advi­sors Pro­gram pilot effort estab­lished in 2010, works for the under­sec­re­tary of defense for pol­i­cy in the part­ner­ship strat­e­gy and sta­bil­i­ty oper­a­tions office.

Thir­ty-two advi­sors are in Afghanistan, and 27 more are in train­ing and will deploy in July, she told Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice. Ulti­mate­ly, the pro­gram seeks to have 100 senior defense advi­sors in Afghanistan, Uribe added, with exper­tise in logis­tics and infra­struc­ture man­age­ment, per­son­nel and readi­ness man­age­ment, doc­trine train­ing, defense pol­i­cy, acqui­si­tion, edu­ca­tion and oth­er areas.

The advi­sor pro­gram, Uribe said, “is designed to make sure that we’re devel­op­ing well enough at the insti­tu­tion­al and min­istry lev­els [to sus­tain] all the invest­ments we’ve made at the oper­a­tional and tech­ni­cal lev­els.”

It’s sys­tems that keep things going, she said, echo­ing the words of Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates in a May/June 2010 For­eign Affairs mag­a­zine arti­cle.

“The Unit­ed States has made great strides in build­ing up the oper­a­tional capac­i­ty of its part­ners by train­ing and equip­ping troops and men­tor­ing them in the field,” Gates wrote.

“But there has not been enough atten­tion paid,” he added, “to build­ing the insti­tu­tion­al capac­i­ty [such as defense min­istries] or the human cap­i­tal [includ­ing lead­er­ship skills and atti­tudes] need­ed to sus­tain secu­ri­ty over the long term.”

Four ele­ments of the advi­sor pro­gram make it unique in the Defense Depart­ment, Uribe said. One of these is train­ing. A sev­en-week course includes five weeks in Wash­ing­ton for pro­fes­sion­al advi­sor train­ing, cul­tur­al aware­ness, coun­try famil­iar­iza­tion, lan­guage instruc­tion and senior-lev­el con­sul­ta­tions and brief­in­gs, and two weeks at Camp Atter­bury in Indi­ana for an eval­u­at­ed exer­cise.

Three oth­er ele­ments are:
— Back­fill: The pro­gram has fund­ing to pay the par­ent orga­ni­za­tion to hire a tem­po­rary replace­ment for the deploy­ing senior man­ag­er;
— Reach­back: Advi­sors can use their own con­tacts and call on experts from their par­ent orga­ni­za­tions to help with the mis­sion in Afghanistan; and,
— Part­ner­ship: The long-term goal is to estab­lish an ongo­ing part­ner­ship between the Defense Depart­ment in the Unit­ed States and Afghanistan’s defense min­istry.

“At the same time that we’re under­tak­ing to build these effec­tive and account­able defense insti­tu­tions for our part­ners,” Uribe said, “we’re expand­ing pro­fes­sion­al oppor­tu­ni­ties for our senior DOD civil­ians, pro­vid­ing them a lot of addi­tion­al train­ing that we believe they’re going to bring back to their own orga­ni­za­tions.”

Richard A. Pol­litt, one of those senior civil­ians, is direc­tor of logis­tics at the U.S. Army Gar­ri­son in Bam­burg, Ger­many. He is a logis­tics expert who has been on the ground in Afghanistan for 11 months and who just extend­ed his stay for anoth­er four months.

“I want­ed to see some of these process­es and sys­tems that we worked so hard to put in place come to fruition,” he said.

Pol­litt is the senior civil­ian advi­sor to Afghan Maj. Gen. Tim­or Shah, chief of logis­tics at Afghanistan’s inte­ri­or min­istry.

“The pro­gram is all about devel­op­ing capac­i­ty at the min­is­te­r­i­al lev­el,” he said, “and I’ve had a sig­nif­i­cant impact on the min­istry of inte­ri­or logis­tics sys­tem, which sus­tains a police force of just under 150,000.”

On a strate­gic lev­el, he added, “we’ve been able to build capac­i­ty in the logis­tics depart­ment for devel­op­ing a bud­get and a spend plan.”

For the first time, Pol­litt said, the depart­ment has been able to iden­ti­fy and pri­or­i­tize its require­ments for the logis­tics depart­ment.

On an oper­a­tional lev­el, the logis­tics expert said, a test of a logis­tics readi­ness tool recent­ly took place in Pan­jshir province. “That is a com­put­er pro­gram that tracks unit readi­ness and asset vis­i­bil­i­ty,” mak­ing sure all the equip­ment, weapons and vehi­cles are iden­ti­fied in the system’s data­base and account­ed for, he explained.

“We worked with the Afghans, col­lab­o­rat­ed with them from the begin­ning, got their buy-in and asked sim­ple ques­tions — what do you need, what do you want?” Pol­litt added. Such impact and suc­cess, Pol­litt said, is pos­si­ble only if the Afghan coun­ter­part accepts the pro­gram advi­sor, a time-con­sum­ing but crit­i­cal process he learned about dur­ing his sev­en weeks of pre-deploy­ment train­ing.

“It was very, very help­ful com­ing into this type of posi­tion to have back­ground train­ing, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the cul­tur­al area, on deal­ing with senior-lev­el Afghans,” Pol­litt said. Suc­cess in Afghanistan involves build­ing rela­tion­ships, he added.

“My first six weeks, even though I’m a func­tion­al expert in logis­tics, I did­n’t go in and start demon­strat­ing what I knew about par­tic­u­lar pro­grams. I would sit there and when I was addressed I would respond,” Pol­litt said. “After about six weeks, [the Afghans] start­ed com­mu­ni­cat­ing and opened up dia­logue and then opened up a rela­tion­ship.

“Some­times an advi­sor will go in and they’re not accept­ed,” Pol­litt added. “The Afghans will be very friend­ly, cor­dial and amenable. But when it gets down to pro­duc­ing results or try­ing to set a process or pro­ce­dure in place, it won’t advance very far. That rela­tion­ship is crit­i­cal.”

Pol­litt said he knew he was accept­ed when Shah invit­ed him to his home for din­ner.

From the suc­cess­ful and grow­ing pro­gram in Afghanistan, Uribe said, “we have demon­strat­ed a proof of con­cept and hope that we can use lessons learned to take the pro­gram glob­al.” The scope of the pro­gram for oth­er coun­tries will depend on each country’s needs, she said.

“We are send­ing a large num­ber of civil­ian advi­sors to Afghanistan,” the direc­tor said, but only one or two advi­sors might be sent to help anoth­er for­eign part­ner.

“For exam­ple, a part­ner coun­try might say, ‘We’re rework­ing our logis­tics sys­tem and would wel­come an advi­sor from the Defense Logis­tics Agency to con­sult with us in the com­ing year,’ ” she explained.

The advi­sors, Uribe said, would work in close coor­di­na­tion with the coun­try team on the ground.

“The main imped­i­ment right now to tak­ing the pro­gram glob­al is leg­isla­tive author­i­ty that would allow us to oper­ate glob­al­ly,” she said. “We are seek­ing that.”

In the mean­time, Uribe said, there are more oppor­tu­ni­ties for advi­sors in Afghanistan.

“The next class has to have its appli­ca­tions in by Sept. 1,” she said. “We’re mov­ing into our big recruit­ment sea­son over the sum­mer to build our next class. Advi­sors will start train­ing in Sep­tem­ber and deploy into Afghanistan at the begin­ning of Novem­ber.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →