Budget Proposal Strengthens Nuclear Modernization, Official Says

WASHINGTON, Feb. 16, 2012 — The Defense Department’s strat­e­gy-based bud­get pro­pos­al sent to Con­gress ear­li­er this week would strength­en the nation’s nuclear weapons enter­prise and mod­ern­iza­tion, a senior Pen­ta­gon offi­cial said here yes­ter­day.

“We’ve come a long way in the past three years in estab­lish­ing the con­text and the pro­grams for nuclear mod­ern­iza­tion, but sig­nif­i­cant chal­lenges remain,” John Har­vey, prin­ci­pal deputy assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for nuclear, chem­i­cal and bio­log­i­cal defense pro­grams, said dur­ing remarks at the fourth annu­al Nuclear Deter­rence Sum­mit.

“On the plus side, the nuclear pos­ture review has defined an inte­grat­ed, bal­anced and com­pre­hen­sive strat­e­gy for reduc­ing nuclear dan­gers,” he said. “The strat­e­gy strong­ly cou­ples our nuclear deter­rent to oth­er ele­ments of our nuclear secu­ri­ty, includ­ing strate­gic arms con­trol, non­pro­lif­er­a­tion, threat reduc­tion and [weapons of mass destruc­tion] coun­tert­er­ror­ism.”

Har­vey said recent bud­gets have pro­vid­ed more fund­ing toward mod­ern­iza­tion.

“After more than a decade of seri­ous under­fund­ing the nuclear weapons enter­prise, the pres­i­dent put for­ward bud­get requests in [fis­cal 2011] and [fis­cal 2012] that includ­ed sub­stan­tial new invest­ments for this mis­sion,” he said. “We’ve had a very high lev­el of sup­port with­in the admin­is­tra­tion for get­ting these invest­ments fund­ed and sus­tained by Con­gress.”

To demon­strate the department’s com­mit­ment to these pro­grams, he said, offi­cials agreed to trans­fer $5.7 bil­lion in top-line author­i­ty for fis­cal 2011 to fis­cal 2015. Lat­er, he added, this was aug­ment­ed by an addi­tion $2.2 bil­lion to be allo­cat­ed in annu­al incre­ments in fis­cal 2012 through fis­cal 2016.

Har­vey also cred­it­ed Con­gress for its approval of fund­ing to con­tin­ue mod­ern­iza­tion.

“The final fund­ing lev­els appro­pri­at­ed by Con­gress for [fis­cal 2011] were huge boosts to the enter­prise and reflect­ed some of the DOD con­tri­bu­tion,” he said. “The recent con­gres­sion­al appro­pri­a­tion for [fis­cal 2012], while it did not go as far as we had hoped on the [Nation­al Nuclear Secu­ri­ty Admin­is­tra­tion] side, pro­vides a basis for con­tin­ued progress.”

Har­vey touched on some of the chal­lenges fac­ing nuclear weapons enter­prise as the nation is “embed­ded in an increas­ing­ly aus­tere bud­get envi­ron­ment” and warned of seri­ous prob­lems if a “seques­tra­tion” mech­a­nism in the bud­get law adds anoth­er $500 bil­lion in defense spend­ing cuts over the next decade if Con­gress fails to over­ride the pro­vi­sion.

“The Bud­get Con­trol Act, passed ear­li­er this year, cou­pled with fact-of-life growth in key pro­grams, has forced us to tight­en our belts,” he not­ed. “The impli­ca­tions of the [seques­tra­tion] under the Bud­get Con­trol Act are so dire that we, in the depart­ment, are unwill­ing to con­sid­er it a plau­si­ble prospect,” he said.

Pro­tract­ed gov­ern­ment fund­ing delays in recent years have tak­en a toll, Har­vey told the audi­ence.

“The finan­cial grid­lock char­ac­ter­is­tic of recent bud­get exer­cis­es and con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tions has had an impact on all fed­er­al agen­cies, includ­ing the Depart­ment of Defense and the Depart­ment of Ener­gy,” Har­vey said. In the cur­rent fis­cal envi­ron­ment, he added, DOD still may receive what it is seek­ing in mod­ern­iza­tion, but per­haps not on the intend­ed time­line.

“Our best strat­e­gy is sol­id, cost-effec­tive imple­men­ta­tion of high-pri­or­i­ty pro­grams that address the long-term state of the nuclear enter­prise,” he said.

Har­vey said the president’s bud­get pro­pos­al for fis­cal 2013 increas­es NNSA funds for weapons by 5 per­cent more than last year’s appro­pri­at­ed funds to “main­tain our com­mit­ment to the pro­grams and capa­bil­i­ties to essen­tial DOD’s strate­gic deter­rence mis­sion.” He cit­ed the president’s last bud­get pro­pos­al as an increase in fund­ing that demon­strates fur­ther com­mit­ment to revi­tal­iz­ing the nuclear weapons enter­prise.

“The president’s [fis­cal 2013] request for NNSA basi­cal­ly increas­es funds for weapons by 5 per­cent above the amount that was appro­pri­at­ed in [fis­cal 2012],” he said. “[It] main­tains our com­mit­ment to the pro­grams and capa­bil­i­ties essen­tial to DOD’s strate­gic deter­rence mis­sion.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →