Budget Proposal Requests Smaller, More Modern, Agile Force

WASHINGTON, Feb. 13, 2012 — The mil­i­tary will reduce its end strength by 5.5 per­cent over five years, while pre­serv­ing mil­i­tary pay and ben­e­fits for cur­rent mem­bers and invest­ing in tech­nol­o­gy and sys­tems to counter future threats, accord­ing to Pen­ta­gon bud­get doc­u­ments released today.

The fis­cal 2013 pro­pos­al calls for a $525.4 bil­lion base bud­get, down $5.2 bil­lion from the cur­rent year, and $88.5 bil­lion for over­seas con­tin­gency oper­a­tions, down $26.6 bil­lion.

The pro­pos­al fol­lows the mil­i­tary strat­e­gy guid­ance Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma released last month that pro­vides a tran­si­tion from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to a more agile and flex­i­ble mil­i­tary that responds to broad chal­lenges and main­tains glob­al supe­ri­or­i­ty while also help­ing to reduce the nation­al deficit, offi­cials said.

The admin­is­tra­tion has been work­ing toward a $487 bil­lion reduc­tion in pro­ject­ed defense spend­ing over the next decade, and the fis­cal 2013 bud­get pro­pos­al calls for $259 bil­lion in sav­ings in the next five years. Offi­cials said those sav­ings would come from con­tin­ued efforts at becom­ing more effi­cient, reduc­ing over­head and dupli­ca­tion, and slow­ing the growth of per­son­nel costs.

Defense offi­cials said they fol­lowed a three-prong strat­e­gy for the bud­get request: to make dis­ci­plined use of resources, to fol­low strate­gic mil­i­tary guid­ance on deci­sions about force struc­ture and invest­ments, and to ensure the qual­i­ty of the all-vol­un­teer force while also slow­ing the growth of pay and ben­e­fits.

The pro­pos­al calls for $61 bil­lion in spend­ing cuts through fis­cal 2017 — a con­tin­u­a­tion of $150 bil­lion in pro­posed bud­get “effi­cien­cies” in the cur­rent bud­get year — through reduced over­head and sup­port, as well as improved busi­ness prac­tices. It also calls for the depart­ment to become audit-ready by 2017.

The plan would increase invest­ments in unmanned air­craft and tac­ti­cal vehi­cles, main­tain the joint strike fight­er, and ter­mi­nate the C‑27 air­lift air­craft and new weath­er satel­lites.

Also as part of the bud­get pro­pos­al:

— The Army would elim­i­nate at least eight brigade com­bat teams;

— The Navy would elim­i­nate sev­en cruis­ers and two dock land­ing ships;

— The Marine Corps would elim­i­nate one infantry reg­i­ment head­quar­ters, five infantry bat­tal­ions, one artillery bat­tal­ion, four tac­ti­cal air squadrons and one com­bat logis­tics bat­tal­ion;

— The Air Force elim­i­nates six com­bat cod­ed fight­er squadrons and one non­com­bat cod­ed fight­er squadron, and 303 air­craft, includ­ing 123 com­bat air­craft, 150 mobil­i­ty and tanker air­craft and 30 intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance air­craft.

End-strength reduc­tions would rise incre­men­tal­ly from a 1.4 per­cent reduc­tion in fis­cal 2013 to a 5.5 per­cent reduc­tion in 2017. The break­down by ser­vice would be:

— For the Army, a 0.9 per­cent reduc­tion next year to 1,115,300, going to a 6.8 per­cent reduc­tion in 2017;

— For the Navy, a 1.7 per­cent reduc­tion next year to 385,000, going to a 3.9 per­cent reduc­tion in 2017.

— For the Marine Corps, a 2 per­cent reduc­tion next year to 236,900, going to an 8.3 per­cent reduc­tion in 2017; and

— For the Air Force, a 1.9 per­cent reduc­tion next year, going to a 2.3 per­cent reduc­tion in 2017.

The bud­get request includes a 1.7 per­cent mil­i­tary pay raise, a 4.2 per­cent aver­age increase in the basic hous­ing allowance, and a 3.4 per­cent rise in the basic allowance for sub­sis­tence.

As part of the plan, the Mil­i­tary Health Sys­tem would receive $48.7 bil­lion, down from $52.8 bil­lion this year. Though there would be some fee increas­es in TRICARE and phar­ma­cy co-pays for retirees younger than 65, offi­cials said, fees will not increase for active-duty ser­vice mem­bers, sur­vivors of mil­i­tary mem­bers who died on active duty or med­ical­ly retired ser­vice mem­bers.

The bud­get request match­es TRICARE mil­i­tary health plan fee increas­es to retire­ment pay. Retirees receiv­ing $22,589 or less would pay $600 in enroll­ment fees in 2013, ris­ing to $893 in 2017. Those receiv­ing retire­ment pay of $45,179 or more would pay $820 in 2013 and $2,048 in 2017.

The bud­get request does not change the mil­i­tary retire­ment sys­tem in 2013, but includes a Defense Depart­ment request that Con­gress estab­lish a mil­i­tary retire­ment com­mis­sion to deter­mine whether cost-effec­tive changes should be made to the cur­rent sys­tem.

Defense lead­ers are ful­ly com­mit­ted to assist­ing ser­vice mem­bers and their fam­i­lies, offi­cials said. The bud­get request includes $8.5 bil­lion for fam­i­ly sup­port pro­grams.

The request pro­vides $1.3 bil­lion in fund­ing for child care space for more than 200,000 chil­dren, as well as $1.4 bil­lion for fam­i­ly sup­port cen­ters and morale, wel­fare and recre­ation pro­grams. It also com­mits $2.7 bil­lion for the edu­ca­tion of more than 61,000 stu­dents at DOD Edu­ca­tion Activ­i­ty schools in 12 coun­tries and more than 33,000 stu­dents in sev­en states, Puer­to Rico and Guam.

The request includes more than $50 mil­lion to improve pub­lic school facil­i­ties on mil­i­tary instal­la­tions.

Mil­i­tary con­struc­tion fund­ing is set at $9.1 bil­lion, and fam­i­ly hous­ing at $1.7 bil­lion.

Under the pro­pos­al, the DOD civil­ian work force will decrease by 1 per­cent in 2013, and will receive a 0.5‑percent pay raise, fol­low­ing a two-year pay freeze.

The bud­get request also seeks increas­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties for flex­i­ble work sched­ules and sup­ports employ­ee lead­er­ship devel­op­ment, train­ing and well­ness.

The request includes an over­all $88.5 bil­lion for Afghanistan and Iraq, down from $115.1 bil­lion this year. Fund­ing require­ments have dropped in bal­ance with decreased troop lev­els, offi­cials said. The num­ber of troops in Afghanistan is set to fall from 95,000 in the first quar­ter of this year to 68,000 by the end of 2013. Fund­ing for Iraq — $2.9 bil­lion is request­ed for 2013 — pro­vides for equip­ment reset and DOD’s costs for the State Depart­ment-led Office of Secu­ri­ty Coop­er­a­tion in Iraq.

Over­seas con­tin­gency oper­a­tions costs include $48.2 bil­lion for oper­a­tions, $9.3 bil­lion for equip­ment reset, and $5.7 bil­lion for Afghan army and police forces.

The bud­get request includes $5.1 bil­lion for force pro­tec­tion, includ­ing body armor and pro­tec­tive gear as well as armored and mine-resis­tant vehi­cles. Anoth­er $4.5 bil­lion is planned for mil­i­tary intel­li­gence fund­ing, which includes invest­ments in intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance assets.

The request would invest $1.4 bil­lion in fund­ing divid­ed among the NATO alliance ground sur­veil­lance sys­tem, the com­bat­ant com­mand exer­cise and engage­ment pro­gram, the Nation­al Guard State Part­ner­ship Pro­gram and the Secu­ri­ty Force Assis­tance Pro­gram.

The request also pro­vides for $3.8 bil­lion in unmanned air sys­tems, $3.4 bil­lion for cyber, $9.7 bil­lion in bal­lis­tic mis­sile defense, $8 bil­lion for space sys­tems, and $11.9 bil­lion is sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy, includ­ing a $2.1 bil­lion set-aside for basic research.

Pro­gram cuts pro­ject­ed from fis­cal 2013 to fis­cal 2017 total $75 bil­lion, includ­ing $15.1 bil­lion from the joint strike fight­er and $13.1 bil­lion in reduced ship­build­ing.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →