Afghans, Coalition Work to Avert ‘Insider’ Attacks

WASHINGTON, March 26, 2012 — Afghan and coali­tion lead­ers are work­ing to lim­it “insid­er threat” killings in Afghanistan, the com­man­der of U.S. and NATO forces there told reporters here today.

Marine Corps Gen. John R. Allen said at a Pen­ta­gon news con­fer­ence that Afghan and coali­tion forces have changed their oper­a­tions to address the killing of coali­tion mem­bers by Afghan sol­diers or police forces, also known as “green-on-blue” events.

Fif­teen coali­tion mem­bers have been killed in such events this year. “I think you’re aware that trag­i­cal­ly we had one overnight, as two young British sol­diers were killed in Hel­mand province,” Allen said.

Afghan lead­ers have put in place an eight-step vet­ting process, Allen said, and have placed coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence oper­a­tives in army and police schools, recruit­ing cen­ters and with­in the ranks “to spot and assess the poten­tial emer­gence of an indi­vid­ual who could be an extrem­ist or, in fact, a Tal­iban infil­tra­tor.”

The gen­er­al said some break­throughs have tak­en place, as Afghan inves­ti­ga­tors have arrest­ed peo­ple in uni­form who poten­tial­ly could have been per­pe­tra­tors of “green-on-blue” vio­lence.

“So the process is actu­al­ly work­ing,” he added.

Allen said he has direct­ed Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force troop-con­tribut­ing nations to increase train­ing for their deploy­ing forces. ISAF troops, he added, have changed sleep­ing, bas­ing and guard arrange­ments to bet­ter-pro­tect coali­tion troops.

“Between what the Afghans have done for them­selves, what we’re doing for our­selves and how we’re part­ner­ing togeth­er, we seek to reduce this tragedy to the max­i­mum extent pos­si­ble,” he said.

While the Tal­iban take cred­it for all such attacks, Allen said, the major­i­ty are not a direct result of Tal­iban infil­tra­tion. But it’s no secret that the Tal­iban have for some time tried to infil­trate Afghan forces and ele­ments that sup­port Afghan and coali­tion forces direct­ly, he not­ed.

In most cas­es, the rela­tion­ship between Afghan and coali­tion troops is strong, the gen­er­al said. Still, he acknowl­edged, the attacks are one char­ac­ter­is­tic of coun­terin­sur­gency cam­paigns.

“We expe­ri­enced these in Iraq, [and] we expe­ri­enced them in Viet­nam,” Allen said. “On any occa­sion where you’re deal­ing with an insur­gency and where you’re also grow­ing an indige­nous force — which will ulti­mate­ly be the prin­ci­pal oppo­si­tion to that insur­gency — the enemy’s [going to] do all that they can to dis­rupt the coun­terin­sur­gency oper­a­tions, but also dis­rupt the integri­ty of the indige­nous forces that devel­op.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →