Afghanistan/NATONATO Plan Ties Afghan Economy to Growth of Forces

WASHINGTON — The eco­nom­ic pow­er of mil­i­tary-fueled indus­try has been illus­trat­ed through­out his­to­ry, and it looks like the growth of the Afghan Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Forces will be a boon to devel­op­ing indus­tries in Afghanistan.

U.S. Army Col. John Fer­rari, deputy of pro­grams for NATO Train­ing Mis­sion-Afghanistan, Com­bined Secu­ri­ty Tran­si­tion Com­mand-Afghanistan, dis­cussed how NATO and coali­tion forces have worked to build Afghan forces while focus­ing on Afghan indus­try to sup­port mil­i­tary growth dur­ing a June 4 DoDLive Blog­gers Round­table.

Fer­rari said his pro­gram will have spent about $40 bil­lion by 2011 to recruit, train, equip and sus­tain the Afghan army, as well as the Afghan Nation­al Police. This year, Ferrari’s group has focused on an ini­tia­tive called “Afghan First,” which pro­motes the par­tic­i­pa­tion of Afghan man­u­fac­tur­ers, rather that pur­chas­ing import­ed equip­ment.

Their most-her­ald­ed suc­cess has been with Afghan boot man­u­fac­tur­er Kab­ul Mil­li, who not only received a con­tract to make the boots used by Afghan police and sol­diers, but also received assis­tance to improve man­u­fac­tur­ing tech­niques to make the boots more durable.

“In the past, we used to think we were buy­ing boots here in Afghanistan, but it turned out that they were man­u­fac­tured out­side of Afghanistan and import­ed,” Fer­rari said. “Now in our con­tract we spec­i­fy that we’re only going to buy boots that are man­u­fac­tured in Afghanistan.”

Ini­tial­ly, the man­u­fac­tur­er was the only such busi­ness in the coun­try. Since Kab­ul Mil­li won the con­tract and NATO said it would only buy Afghan-made boots, local com­pe­ti­tion has emerged, Fer­rari said.

“A few oth­er com­pa­nies heard we want­ed to buy local­ly man­u­fac­tured boots, and just two weeks ago I went out and vis­it­ed two new fac­to­ries ris­ing from the ground, where noth­ing exist­ed before, to make boots,” he said. “And so there’s an exam­ple of the econ­o­my and the pri­vate sec­tor react­ing to a known mar­ket demand.”

There have been sim­i­lar recent spikes in growth for oth­er indus­tries to sup­port mil­i­tary needs. Afghanistan-based cloth­ing man­u­fac­tur­ers are mak­ing uni­forms, though no tex­tile fac­to­ries exist there yet, so fab­ric still is import­ed. Blan­kets, pon­cho lin­ers, and oth­er items issued to sol­diers will soon be made by Afghans, as well, Fer­rari said.

“We’re also about a week or two away from award­ing a mul­ti­ple-award con­tract for indi­vid­ual sol­dier equip­ment to women-only-owned busi­ness­es,” he said.

A new com­pa­ny has been cre­at­ed to build fur­ni­ture for Afghan secu­ri­ty forces in Polichar­ki, near Kab­ul. Anoth­er com­pa­ny is learn­ing to build facil­i­ties out of con­nex­es – the met­al ship­ping con­tain­ers one might see stacked on a barge.

“As we’re buy­ing fur­ni­ture for the Afghan secu­ri­ty forces, we can go to them,” Fer­rari said. “And then, anoth­er place we’ve recent­ly been to is learn­ing how to make facil­i­ties … so instead of import­ing those con­nex­es, we will look at get­ting them up to the qual­i­ty that we need and they will be able to do that.”

Paper is anoth­er bur­geon­ing indus­try, Fer­rari said. Because of the near-con­stant state of tur­moil in Afghanistan for the past 30 years, there are vir­tu­al­ly no areas where trees can be har­vest­ed to make paper. Though paper still is import­ed, both civil­ian and gov­ern­ment print­ing com­pa­nies have popped up in recent years, he said.

“The min­istry of defense has its own print plant, and we have a con­tract with local Afghan com­pa­nies to do our mar­ket­ing or our recruit­ing and reten­tion,” the colonel said. “There’s a vibrant local indus­try and a state-owned indus­try that the MOD owns. But, I think it will be years before they’re actu­al­ly mak­ing their own paper here in Afghanistan.”

For now, he said, there won’t be any drop in demand. The U.S. gov­ern­ment spent $20 bil­lion from 2003 to 2009 build­ing the 200,000-man strong Afghan secu­ri­ty forces, and plans to spend the same amount in 2010 and 2011 to recruit, train, and retain anoth­er 100,000 troops.

“In addi­tion to gen­er­at­ing and sus­tain­ing the secu­ri­ty forces, we spend a lot of effort to make sure that what we’re doing here is sus­tain­able in the long term and that the Afghan peo­ple feel that they have an impact on their secu­ri­ty forces,” Fer­rari said. “And so we want to make sure that we devel­op man­u­fac­tur­ing capa­bil­i­ties, jobs and lit­er­a­cy train­ing.” Fer­rari said he hears a lot of ques­tions regard­ing NATO’s eco­nom­ic plans for post-war Afghanistan, and he com­pares its mis­sion to the post-World War II Mar­shall Plan to rebuild Europe.

“We’re invest­ing hun­dreds of mil­lions and bil­lions of dol­lars into the local econ­o­my to jump-start man­u­fac­tur­ing,” he said of the train­ing com­mand. “We’re tak­ing hun­dreds of thou­sands of Afghans who had no for­mal edu­ca­tion, who are not lit­er­ate; we’re bring­ing them into the secu­ri­ty forces.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →