Afghanistan — Corruption Battle Continues in Afghanistan

WASHINGTON, Aug. 5, 2010 — It can’t be shot, it can’t be destroyed with a mor­tar or rock­et-pro­pelled grenade, and most of the time it can’t even be seen. But cor­rup­tion with­in police and mil­i­tary units is one of the biggest threats fac­ing the Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces.

Dur­ing an Aug. 3 “DoD Live” blog­gers round­table, Coast Guard Capt. Steven Ander­sen, staff judge advo­cate for the anti-cor­rup­tion office of NATO Train­ing Mis­sion Afghanistan and Com­bined Secu­ri­ty Tran­si­tion Com­mand Afghanistan, dis­cussed the com­mands’ efforts in work­ing with the Afghan gov­ern­ment to build sys­tems, process­es and insti­tu­tions that lim­it future oppor­tu­ni­ties for cor­rup­tion.

But right now, Ander­sen said, they’re still try­ing to iden­ti­fy prob­lem areas in Afghan forces. It’s dif­fi­cult, he explained, because cor­rup­tion can mean so many dif­fer­ent things – it could be a com­pa­ny com­man­der not pay­ing his troops their full salary or it could be a fake road­block used to shake down trav­el­ers for mon­ey or goods.

“There’s no one mag­ic result that’s going to solve the whole cor­rup­tion prob­lem,” he said.

Ander­sen said he’s been impressed with the will­ing­ness of some Afghan secu­ri­ty forces mem­bers to stand up in the face of cor­rup­tion, risk­ing pos­si­ble ret­ri­bu­tion by their cor­rupt coun­ter­parts, or worse, by insur­gent groups such as the Tal­iban.

“There are cer­tain con­cerns when any indi­vid­ual comes for­ward in any soci­ety to bring for­ward infor­ma­tion about cor­rup­tion or a crime being com­mit­ted,” he said. “Although those con­cerns exist, there are also some very coura­geous and some­what inspir­ing Afghans in the police and the army who are actu­al­ly stand­ing up and mak­ing a stand against cor­rup­tion and things that are going on in the min­istry they know aren’t right.”

The best thing that can hap­pen for Afghanistan is a cul­tur­al shift, Ander­son said, and he added that he does­n’t think it’s a pipe dream or some­thing on the dis­tant hori­zon. It’s not going to hap­pen overnight, he acknowl­edged, but he said the shift already is in progress.

“I do not sub­scribe to the the­o­ry that Afghans accept cor­rup­tion,” Ander­son said. “I believe they tol­er­ate it. I believe they tol­er­ate it because, in some cas­es, there’s no oth­er way to get some things done. But I don’t believe they accept it.”

Ander­sen said he has spo­ken to many Afghans, and his assess­ment is that cor­rup­tion is tol­er­at­ed because of the unsta­ble envi­ron­ment the country’s been in for the past few decades. It’s not an issue of chang­ing moral­i­ty or a sense of right and wrong in the cul­ture, he said. The goal is to make Afghans aware that they don’t need to tol­er­ate bad behav­ior any more.

“I’ve talked to sev­er­al indi­vid­u­als who have [had] reli­gious edu­ca­tion here, and they clear­ly say that their morals are not that dif­fer­ent,” he said. “You know, lying here is lying — it’s like lying in our coun­try. Cheat­ing here is like cheat­ing, lying is like lying. There are some cul­tur­al dif­fer­ences, I think maybe, when it comes to nepo­tism and help­ing peo­ple get jobs and things like that. [An inde­pen­dent sur­vey] asked peo­ple, you know, ‘Do you think this is wrong?’ and a major­i­ty of peo­ple say ‘Yes.’ ”

But sur­veys don’t always pro­vide an accu­rate mea­sure of cor­rup­tion, Ander­son not­ed. Many show skewed data, he explained, because they’re based on per­cep­tion and image, not nec­es­sar­i­ly first-hand expe­ri­ence.

“The police have a cor­rup­tion prob­lem, but some­times I think it gets a lit­tle bit overblown by the sur­veys that are always look­ing at per­cep­tions,” Ander­sen said. “If I have a neigh­bor who tells me that their broth­er-in-law was shak­en down by the police, then my per­cep­tion of the police is that they are cor­rupt, although I might not have expe­ri­enced it.” Lead­er­ship is chang­ing the way is the Afghan secu­ri­ty forces are run. For exam­ple, the new inte­ri­or min­is­ter has been known to trav­el to remote police sta­tions and show up with no announce­ment or fan­fare, some­times in the mid­dle of the night, just to see how things are going, Ander­sen said. A “per­son­al asset inven­to­ry” now is being used to make sure com­man­ders aren’t request­ing mon­ey for eight police­men when they have only five in the unit.

Ander­sen said that kind of involve­ment from lead­er­ship will help immense­ly in weed­ing out the cor­rupt indi­vid­u­als who tar­nish the entire service’s rep­u­ta­tion.

“It’s not every police offi­cer. It’s not every army offi­cer — or every patrol­man, or every NCO, every gen­er­al. It’s not. And that is one of the chal­lenges,” he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →