Afghanistan — Afghanistan Progress Must Be Extended, Petraeus Says

WASHINGTON, Aug. 15, 2010 — Grow­ing pock­ets of secu­ri­ty progress in Afghanistan must be extend­ed and linked to ful­ly root out the Tal­iban and oth­er extrem­ist orga­ni­za­tions, and that will take time, the top U.S. and NATO com­man­der there said in a pre­re­cord­ed inter­view aired today.

“We’re mak­ing progress, and progress is win­ning, if you will,” Army Gen. David H. Petraeus told NBC’s David Gre­go­ry in the “Meet the Press” inter­view. “But it takes the accu­mu­la­tion of a lot of progress ulti­mate­ly … to win over­all, and that’s going to be a long-term propo­si­tion, with­out question.” 

In his first sig­nif­i­cant inter­view since tak­ing com­mand of NATO and U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Petraeus acknowl­edged what he called “up and down” progress, with coali­tion and Afghan forces tak­ing key sanc­tu­ar­ies from the Tal­iban, but not with­out a fight. Petraeus said progress real­ly only began this spring, as more U.S. and inter­na­tion­al forces began pour­ing into the coun­try, stretch­ing out into areas that before were Tal­iban strongholds. 

Late spring saw oper­a­tions in cen­tral Hel­mand province start to improve secu­ri­ty con­di­tions there, but now expand­ing into neigh­bor­ing Kan­da­har province is prov­ing to be a “tough fight,” the gen­er­al said. 

“What we have are areas of progress. We’ve got to link those togeth­er, extend them, and then build on it, because of course the secu­ri­ty progress … is the foun­da­tion for every­thing else — for the gov­er­nance progress, the eco­nom­ic progress, rule of law progress and so forth,” Petraeus said. 

The gen­er­al said he under­stands the grow­ing lack of U.S. patience for the war in Afghanistan, but he not­ed that only in the past 18 months has the prop­er focus been in place for the strat­e­gy on the ground there. 

“A lot of us came out of Iraq in late 2008 and start­ed look­ing intent­ly at Afghanistan,” he said. “We real­ized that we did not have the orga­ni­za­tions that are required for the con­duct of a com­pre­hen­sive civ­il-mil­i­tary coun­terin­sur­gency campaign.” 

Also, he said the fight in Afghanistan was under-resourced. 

Under Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s orders, by the end of this month the num­ber of U.S. troops on the ground there will have near­ly tripled, Petraeus said. Also, NATO forces have expand­ed, and the num­ber of civil­ians sup­port­ing the war will have tripled. Fund­ing also was increased to train 100,000 more Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces. 

The NATO-led Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force in Afghanistan now has almost 120,000 troops from 47 dif­fer­ent coun­tries assigned to it. The Unit­ed States pro­vides 78,430 of those ISAF troops, part of the rough­ly 100,000 Amer­i­can troops now based in the country. 

The largest region­al com­mand in Afghanistan is in the south, with 35,000 troops. The com­mand is focused on Kan­da­har, the country’s sec­ond-largest city and the spir­i­tu­al home of the Tal­iban. The next-largest region­al com­mand is in the east, with 32,000 personnel. 

After the Unit­ed States, the coun­try with the largest num­ber of troops with ISAF is the Unit­ed King­dom with 9,500, fol­lowed by Ger­many with 4,590. France is next with 3,750, fol­lowed by Italy with 3,400, Cana­da with 2,830, Poland with 2,630, Roma­nia with 1,760, Turkey with 1,740, Spain with 1,555, and Aus­tralia with 1,455.

“The inputs are already enabling some out­puts,” Petraeus said. “And, of course, what we have got to show is that these addi­tion­al inputs can allow greater progress, and that that’s progress that can be sus­tained, over time, by Afghan forces and Afghan officials.” 

Petraeus said the com­mit­ment in Afghanistan will be endur­ing, and would not say how many U.S. troops will begin to leave under Obama’s July 2011 tran­si­tion timeline. 

“It would pre­ma­ture to have any kind of assess­ment at this junc­ture as to about what we may or may not be able to tran­si­tion,” he said. But, he added, any troop move­ment will be based on the con­di­tions on the ground. 

“As the con­di­tions per­mit, we tran­si­tion tasks to our Afghan coun­ter­parts and the secu­ri­ty forces in var­i­ous gov­ern­men­tal insti­tu­tions, and that enables a respon­si­ble draw­down of our forces,” he said. 

Petraeus said Obama’s July 2011 time­line to begin turn­ing secu­ri­ty over to the Afghans and draw­ing down U.S. forces pro­vides a sense of urgency for Afghan lead­ers, peo­ple in uni­form and civil­ians con­tribut­ing to the effort “that we’ve got to get on with this, [that] this has been going on for some nine years or so, that there is under­stand­able con­cern [and] in some cas­es, frustration.” 

“And there­fore,” he said, “we have got to real­ly put our shoul­ders to the wheel and show, dur­ing the course of this year, that progress can be achieved.” 

Regard­less of how the tran­si­tion plays out next sum­mer, Petraeus pre­dict­ed an endur­ing U.S. com­mit­ment in Afghanistan that will evolve as the capa­bil­i­ties of the Afghan gov­ern­ment and its forces improve. At the end of the day, he said, it boils down to the Afghan gov­ern­ment becom­ing accept­ed and sup­port­ed by its peo­ple, and in turn pro­vid­ing the sup­port and ser­vices the peo­ple expect. 

“It’s not about their embrace of us. It’s not about us win­ning hearts and minds,” Petraeus said. “It’s about the Afghan gov­ern­ment win­ning hearts and minds.” 

Petraeus said he is leery of using the term “win­ning” with ref­er­ence to the fight in Afghanistan, because it implies a clear-cut and obvi­ous vic­to­ry that will not nec­es­sar­i­ly ensue. 

“It seems to imply that … you just find the right hill out there some­where, you take it, you plant the flag, and you go home to a vic­to­ry parade. I don’t think that’s going to be the case here,” he said. “I think … that this [is] going to require a sub­stan­tial, sig­nif­i­cant com­mit­ment, and that it is going to have to be endur­ing, to some degree — again, albeit its char­ac­ter and its size being scaled down over the years.” 

In the end, the gen­er­al said, the Unit­ed States must remem­ber why it began fight­ing in Afghanistan in first place. 

“We are here so that Afghanistan does not, once again, become a sanc­tu­ary for transna­tion­al extrem­ists the way it was when al-Qai­da planned the 9/11 attacks in the Kan­da­har area, con­duct­ed the ini­tial train­ing for the attack­ers in train­ing camps in Afghanistan before they moved on to Ger­many and then to U.S. flight schools,” he said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →