Acquisitions Improvements Need Permanence, Carter Says

WASHINGTON, March 28, 2011 — With spring com­ing in Afghanistan, the Defense Depart­ment is set to per­form the same “remark­able” work it con­duct­ed in last year’s troop surge to get warfight­ers every­thing they need while work­ing to insti­tu­tion­al­ize those pro­ce­dures, the department’s under­sec­re­tary for acqui­si­tions, tech­nol­o­gy and logis­tics told a con­gres­sion­al­ly estab­lished com­mis­sion today.

The Pentagon’s logis­tics com­mu­ni­ty “per­formed a mir­a­cle” in get­ting warfight­ers in Afghanistan every­thing they need­ed between Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s troop surge direc­tive in Decem­ber 2009 and the arrival of the last of the surge troops in August, Ash­ton B. Carter told the Com­mis­sion on Wartime Con­tract­ing in Iraq and Afghanistan, a bipar­ti­san pan­el cre­at­ed as part of the fis­cal 2008 Nation­al Defense Autho­riza­tion Act.

Defense Depart­ment offi­cials have worked close­ly with the com­mis­sion in imple­ment­ing Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates’ ini­tia­tives to improve the acqui­si­tions process while safe­guard­ing tax­pay­er dol­lars, Carter said.

“We are work­ing off the same list of chal­lenges: to com­bat waste, fraud and abuse in con­tin­gency con­tract­ing; root out cor­rup­tion; get con­trol of the par­tic­u­lar risks of pri­vate secu­ri­ty con­trac­tors; and, above all, to bal­ance the effec­tive response to warfight­er needs and tax­pay­er dol­lars,” he said.

“Fail­ure to do so not only amounts to theft from the tax­pay­er, but theft from those who put them­selves in harm’s way to pro­tect us,” Carter added.

Still, Carter said, “it’s fair to say we’ve not done con­tin­gency con­tract­ing as well as the tax­pay­er and the warfight­er deserve.”

When he accept­ed his cur­rent posi­tion two years ago, Gates told him, “The troops are at war and the Pen­ta­gon is not -– espe­cial­ly your part,” Carter said.

“I took that to heart and have been try­ing to make that not so over the past two years,” he added.

Depart­ment offi­cials are doing every­thing pos­si­ble to field every­thing troops need to make them safe and suc­cess­ful in Afghanistan, Carter said. That includes mak­ing per­ma­nent “the con­stel­la­tion of ad hoc process­es” that allows the depart­ment to get around out­dat­ed, bureau­crat­ic pro­ce­dures to deliv­er equip­ment and sup­plies quick­ly, he said.

For exam­ple, Carter said, he and oth­ers have suc­cess­ful­ly appealed to Con­gress to “repro­gram,” or shift mon­ey with­in its appro­pri­a­tions, to fund need­ed items. The annu­al bud­get cycle, he explained, was designed to plan for war, not to con­duct war.

“We have to cre­ate a fast lane for con­tin­gency acqui­si­tions,” he said. “We’re con­stant­ly hotwiring and work­ing around. That is not sat­is­fac­to­ry. We need a bet­ter sys­tem.”

Through the workarounds, the depart­ment was able to field requests for more and improved air­craft for intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance, as well as for impro­vised explo­sive device detec­tors and the all-ter­rain ver­sion of mine-resis­tant, ambush-pro­tect­ed vehi­cles, the under­sec­re­tary said.

On his pri­or­i­ty for sav­ing pub­lic mon­ey, Carter said every­one con­nect­ed to the Defense Depart­ment must face the real­i­ty of flat­ten­ing bud­gets.

“We don’t antic­i­pate, and cer­tain­ly we don’t plan, to see the defense bud­get go down in any way like it did in the 1990s,” he said. “After all, we are a coun­try at war, and we can­not com­pro­mise on the capa­bil­i­ties we now plan. At the same time, we do not expect the dou­ble-dig­it annu­al gains like we’ve had since 9/11.

“Flat is going to feel very dif­fer­ent to us for­ev­er upward,” he added. “The sec­re­tary wants us to begin to adjust to the new era.”

To make that adjust­ment, Carter has direct­ed acqui­si­tions man­agers to always con­sid­er what prod­ucts and ser­vices should cost ver­sus what com­pa­nies say they will cost; to demand com­pe­ti­tion in all con­tract­ing; and to con­sid­er “pro­duc­tiv­i­ty growth” –- that items improve over time, while becom­ing less expen­sive.

“None of that mat­ters if we don’t have good peo­ple exe­cut­ing it,” Carter said. “We over­steered in the past decade in down­siz­ing the acqui­si­tion work­force.”

Offi­cials are work­ing to add near­ly 1,500 acqui­si­tions man­age­ment and sup­port posi­tions, he added.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →