U.S.Army Will Remain Superior Fighting Force, Officials Say

WASHINGTON, Feb. 14, 2012 — Though its por­tion of Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s fis­cal 2013 defense bud­get request required tough deci­sions made nec­es­sary by loom­ing spend­ing reduc­tions, the Army will remain a supe­ri­or fight­ing force, senior Army offi­cials said here yes­ter­day.

In a brief­ing for reporters at the Pen­ta­gon, Army Bud­get Direc­tor Maj. Gen. Phillip E. McGhee and Bar­bara L. Bones­sa, deputy Army bud­get direc­tor, dis­cussed the request for $134.6 bil­lion in base­line fund­ing and anoth­er $50 bil­lion in over­seas con­tin­gency funds for the Army in the president’s bud­get request. “This request real­ly reflects the results of some very hard and dif­fi­cult choic­es that we had,” McGhee said. “But I will tell you now that the Army will remain the best-led, best-trained, best-equipped ground force in the world.” 

The Army’s bud­get direc­tor said the fis­cal 2013 pro­pos­al sup­ports the Army’s role in the defense strat­e­gy, including: 

— Train­ing and equip­ping sol­diers and units to address the cur­rent fight while main­tain­ing a high lev­el of readiness; 

— Recruit­ing and sus­tain­ing a high-qual­i­ty all-vol­un­teer Army of sol­diers, civil­ians and families; 

— Sup­port­ing mod­ern­iza­tion pri­or­i­ties such as net­works, tac­ti­cal vehi­cles, and avi­a­tion and sol­dier systems; 

— Fund­ing ongo­ing mil­i­tary oper­a­tions, sus­tain­ment and force pro­tec­tion for Oper­a­tion Endur­ing Freedom; 

— Reset­ting sol­diers, their fam­i­lies, equip­ment and units; and 

— Invest­ing in enter­prise ini­tia­tives such as ener­gy effi­cien­cy, audit readi­ness and reduc­ing the cost of doing business. 

The fis­cal 2013 bud­get request also takes into account a por­tion of the reduc­tion in the size of the active-duty Army that will take place over the next five years, McGhee said. He not­ed that while that reduc­tion is defined in terms of num­bers, the Army still needs to deter­mine what that small­er Army should look like. 

“So both the Depart­ment of Defense and the Army lead­er­ship have direct­ed the Army staff to go ahead and put a com­pre­hen­sive review togeth­er and deter­mine what is the right force struc­ture for the Army,” the gen­er­al said. 

Bones­sa out­lined sev­er­al major pro­gram cuts that she said reflect the tough deci­sions made nec­es­sary by spend­ing cuts required over the next decade. 

Cut­ting the enhanced medi­um-alti­tude recon­nais­sance and sur­veil­lance air­craft will gen­er­ate about $1.2 bil­lion in sav­ings, she said. Base-bud­get fund­ing is cut for the Humvee recap­i­tal­iza­tion pro­gram, she added, but the Army will con­tin­ue to sup­port that pro­gram with over­seas con­tin­gency funds. The medi­um tac­ti­cal vehi­cle pro­gram will ter­mi­nate in fis­cal 2014 and will gen­er­ate about $1.4 bil­lion in cost avoid­ance or sav­ings over the next five years, Bones­sa said. 

Also over the next five years, she said, ter­mi­na­tion of the Mount­ed Sol­dier Sys­tem and the Joint Pre­ci­sion Approach and Land­ing Sys­tem will gen­er­ate anoth­er $900 mil­lion in spend­ing reductions. 

The bud­get request also reflects restruc­tur­ing of a sig­nif­i­cant num­ber of oth­er pro­grams, Bones­sa said. 

“There are some accel­er­a­tions out of about the hun­dred or so that we can count as hav­ing been restruc­tured,” she said, “but by far, the major­i­ty of them are pro­grams that we’re chang­ing the require­ments, chang­ing the scope, or, in many cas­es, extend­ing or spread­ing out the pro­cure­ment over mul­ti­ple years, a longer peri­od of time, in order to gen­er­ate savings.” 

The pro­gram ter­mi­na­tions and restruc­tur­ing do pose a risk for the defense indus­tri­al base, Bones­sa acknowledged. 

“We believe, at this point, that it’s man­age­able,” she said, “but those are busi­ness deci­sions that will rest with the pri­vate sec­tor, and we won’t be able to address any of them with cer­tain­ty right now.” 

Bones­sa said the choic­es made for the bud­get pro­pos­al were tough but nec­es­sary and in the best inter­ests of main­tain­ing a supe­ri­or fight­ing force. 

“As has been said … the Army is the best-led, best-trained, and best-equipped ground force in the world,” she said. “There is noth­ing that our lead­ers or this depart­ment would allow to hap­pen or do to pre­clude that. So we’re con­tin­u­ing to meet our com­mit­ments in Afghanistan and around the world. We’re devel­op­ing the Army for the future.” 

McGhee empha­sized that the fis­cal 2013 bud­get request “sus­tains our com­mit­ments to care for our sol­diers and our fam­i­lies.” For exam­ple, he said, the request includes $1.7 bil­lion for fam­i­ly pro­grams to rein­force holis­tic fit­ness, mit­i­gate stress and build resilience. 

“We’re con­tin­u­ing to care for sol­diers and fam­i­lies,” Bones­sa added. That is one of the most impor­tant com­mit­ments we could pos­si­bly have, com­men­su­rate with their sac­ri­fice and service.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →