USA/Kanada — Lynn: Cyber Attack Would Affect U.S., Canadian Links

OTTAWA, June 14, 2010 — The links between the Unit­ed States and Cana­da are so strong that a cyber attack on one would be felt with­in mil­lisec­onds by the oth­er, and both coun­tries must work togeth­er to improve cyber­se­cu­ri­ty, the deputy defense sec­re­tary said here today.

Dur­ing an inter­view fol­low­ing a speech to the Con­fer­ence of Defence Asso­ci­a­tions, William J. Lynn III said there is an urgency in both nations to take on the cyber­se­cu­ri­ty challenge. 

The Unit­ed States and Cana­da are linked togeth­er in every way from mil­i­tary to infra­struc­ture to eco­nom­ics. U.S. banks oper­ate in Cana­da, and Cana­di­an banks oper­ate in Amer­i­ca. Ford has auto plants in Cana­da, and Bom­bardier Inc. has U.S. plants. The Cana­di­an and U.S. telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions sec­tors are so inter­twined they could­n’t pos­si­bly be sep­a­rat­ed, and pow­er from Cana­di­an plants at Nia­gara Falls ensure New York City and much of the East­ern seaboard remains light­ed. And Cana­di­an and U.S. ser­vice­mem­bers man the North Amer­i­can Aero­space Defense Com­mand to pro­tect the continent. 

All rely on infor­ma­tion tech­nol­o­gy, and all pos­si­bly can be tar­gets for rogue nations, ter­ror­ists or crim­i­nal groups, Lynn noted. 

“A crit­i­cal part of how we improve is work­ing togeth­er with our allies,” the deputy sec­re­tary said. “We start­ed with our clos­est allies – we’ve talked to the UK and Aus­tralia and Cana­da – and we will build out to a larg­er NATO audi­ence as we work through this. But both geog­ra­phy and the close­ness of the alliance with Cana­da, makes Cana­da a par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant part­ner as we tack­le these threats.” 

Lynn met with Deputy Min­is­ter of Nation­al Defense Robert Fon­berg and Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Advi­sor Marie-Lucie Morin today. Accom­pa­nied by the U.S. Ambas­sador to Cana­da David Jacob­son, Lynn said he had a good recep­tion about defense devel­op­ments and cyber­se­cu­ri­ty in particular. 

The lead­ers dis­cussed ways to increase part­ner­ship against the cyber threat. “I think it’s more a high-lev­el exchange of experts right now,” Lynn said. “We need a bet­ter under­stand­ing of the pol­i­cy issues. We already have a good tech­no­log­i­cal exchange based on the sig­nals intel­li­gence shar­ing agreements.” 

The Unit­ed States and Cana­da need to work inside their own gov­ern­ments and with oth­er nations to define the inter­na­tion­al norms that apply. 

“The laws of war are frankly imper­fect when you address cyber­se­cu­ri­ty,” Lynn said. “How do you adapt them? How do you have appro­pri­ate con­straints and rules and process­es that peo­ple can agree on?” 

He point­ed to the the­o­ry of deter­rence in the cyber­world. Before a coun­try can deter an ene­my, it has to know who is launch­ing the attack. 

“In the nuclear are­na … there were cer­tain things that you had that you don’t have in the cyber­world. One is attri­bu­tion,” he said. “Mis­siles come with a return address. You know who launched it.” 

But in cyber­space it is often dif­fi­cult to iden­ti­fy the attack­er, and even when it can be done, it may take months, Lynn said. 

Sim­i­lar­ly, there is a lot of gray areas in exact­ly what con­sti­tutes an attack in this realm. 

“In the nuclear world it was pret­ty clear,” he said. “In the cyber area, if they are steal­ing data, is that an attack? What if they shut down cer­tain web­sites, is that an attack? You get to loss of life and huge eco­nom­ic dam­age – that peo­ple would agree [it’s an attack]. 

“And then what about coun­ter­ing?” he con­tin­ued. “If you are not sure it’s an attack and you can’t attribute it, who do you go after?” 

Most peo­ple are focused on high-end threats from nation states, but a mod­er­ate­ly resourced ter­ror­ist group or crim­i­nal gang can devel­op and launch a pret­ty dev­as­tat­ing cyber attack, Lynn said. 

“Deter­rence works if the oth­er side has some­thing to lose,” he said. “These groups may not have anything.” 

The Unit­ed States will con­tin­ue these dis­cus­sions with its clos­est allies and then roll them right into NATO

“We’re look­ing to have mutu­al­ly sup­port­ive approach­es,” Lynn said. “How inte­grat­ed that would need to be is some­thing we need to define. In NATO’s new strate­gic con­cept, cyber plays a vital role, and NATO will be tack­ling this issue as an alliance. And that’s impor­tant. We need to work our way through this. 

“We real­ly do need a col­lab­o­ra­tive, joint approach,” he con­tin­ued. “It won’t do to approach these things singly and independently.” 

Lynn will con­tin­ue meet­ings with Cana­di­an offi­cials tomorrow. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →