USA — WikiLeaks Has Yet to Contact ‘Competent Authorities’

WASHINGTON, Aug. 18, 2010 — The oper­a­tors of a web­site that pub­lished tens of thou­sands of clas­si­fied doc­u­ments have con­tact­ed no “com­pe­tent author­i­ties” in the Defense Depart­ment, a Pen­ta­gon spokesman said here today.

Wik­iLeaks already has released 90,000 clas­si­fied doc­u­ments, and the site’s pub­lish­er said he plans to release about 15,000 more. 

“Those doc­u­ments should be returned,” Pen­ta­gon spokesman Bryan Whit­man said. “There should be no fur­ther post­ing of these clas­si­fied doc­u­ments, and those that have been post­ed should be removed.” 

The Army’s Crim­i­nal Inves­ti­ga­tion Divi­sion and the FBI are con­duct­ing an inves­ti­ga­tion into the leak of the documents. 

Wik­iLeaks offi­cials have attempt­ed to use the media as an inter­me­di­ary, “but the Defense Depart­ment has had no direct con­tact with Wik­iLeaks,” Whit­man said. 

In any event, the Defense Depart­ment is not inter­est­ed in nego­ti­at­ing with the orga­ni­za­tion, Whit­man said, not­ing that it’s sim­ply against the law to release clas­si­fied doc­u­ments. If Defense Depart­ment offi­cials par­tic­i­pat­ed in try­ing to san­i­tize or redact these doc­u­ments, he said, they still would be guilty of releas­ing clas­si­fied documents. 

“These doc­u­ments are prop­er­ty of the Unit­ed States gov­ern­ment,” Whit­man said. “The unau­tho­rized release of them threat­ens the lives of coali­tion forces, as well as Afghan nation­als. All should be returned imme­di­ate­ly, they should be removed from the Web, there should be no fur­ther post­ing of them to the Web, and all data bases con­tain­ing them should be destroyed.” 

Defense Depart­ment offi­cials are ana­lyz­ing the leaked doc­u­ments to try to min­i­mize the risk to coali­tion forces and to Afghans who worked with the coali­tion, Whit­man said, though he would not get into specifics. 

Anoth­er dan­ger of the leaks is the pos­si­bil­i­ty that com­mands may safe­guard infor­ma­tion and intel­li­gence so much that those who need it won’t get it, Whit­man noted. 

“There is a bal­ance to make sure that all the avail­able intel­li­gence is acces­si­ble where it needs to be acces­si­ble,” Whit­man said. “But there should be safe­guards, too, to pre­clude or mit­i­gate instances where peo­ple may be act­ing in an improp­er, unau­tho­rized or even ille­gal way.” 

Intel­li­gence is a tool that young ser­vice­mem­bers must have to car­ry out their mis­sions, he added. 

“Any­thing that we do as we assess the sit­u­a­tion here and learn lessons from this will always be bal­anced with the imper­a­tive that our forces on the ground need to have access to the best infor­ma­tion that we can pro­vide them,” he said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →