USA — Mullen Stresses Precision, Innovation to Graduates

FORT LESLEY J. MCNAIR, Wash­ing­ton, D.C. — The chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff today told grad­u­ates of the Nation­al Defense Uni­ver­si­ty here that their careers will be dom­i­nat­ed by their under­stand­ing of the pre­cise appli­ca­tion of mil­i­tary force and nation­al pow­er.

NDU’s Nation­al War Col­lege and the Indus­tri­al Col­lege of the Armed Forces grad­u­at­ed 603 peo­ple from the armed ser­vices, civil­ian agen­cies and many for­eign coun­tries. U.S. Trans­porta­tion Sec­re­tary Ray LaHood and King Abdul­lah of Jor­dan were among the guests. 

The abil­i­ty to project mil­i­tary pow­er will con­tin­ue to be a require­ment in the future and the U.S. and its allies must be ready and able to apply that pow­er across the full-spec­trum of oper­a­tions, Navy Adm. Mike Mullen said dur­ing his com­mence­ment address. 

“From deter­rence right on up to and includ­ing post-com­bat peace oper­a­tions, we have with­in our respec­tive ser­vices – and to our respec­tive nations – a duty and a respon­si­bil­i­ty to pro­vide our lead­ers options,” he said. “But one option we don’t have any more – if, indeed, we ever did – is to be indiscriminate.” 

U.S. mil­i­tary force ought to be applied in a pre­cise and prin­ci­pled man­ner, the chair­man said. Since the Per­sian Gulf War, Amer­i­cans have got­ten used to watch­ing videos of very pre­cise aer­i­al strikes, and the tech­nol­o­gy has improved over time. Pre­ci­sion has come to dom­i­nate con­ven­tion­al war­fare, the admi­ral said, and it clear­ly is key to fight­ing a coun­terin­sur­gency cam­paign as well. 

“In this case, pre­ci­sion is less about weapons accu­ra­cy than it is about intent,” Mullen said. “You need a light touch here, not a heavy hand. You need to be less intru­sive and more insight­ful; less in con­trol and more in support.” 

This does not mean the mil­i­tary is becom­ing less lethal. “When you fight, you do so in as lethal and dis­ci­plined a fash­ion as pos­si­ble,” Mullen said. “We can­not shrink from our duty to kill a ruth­less ene­my who him­self mur­ders and maims inno­cent peo­ple as a strategy.” 

But even those sit­u­a­tions demand deft­ness and pre­ci­sion because each errant bomb, each inno­cent per­son killed, works against a coun­terin­sur­gency strat­e­gy. “That is why the thresh­old for the use of indi­rect fire in Afghanistan is so high,” the chair­man said. 

That’s why Army Gen. Stan­ley A. McChrys­tal, com­man­der of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, issued more restric­tive rules for night raids. “And it’s why he has coali­tion troops oper­at­ing in sup­port of Afghan sol­diers and not the oth­er way around,” Mullen said. 

Offi­cers who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan know the impor­tance of restraint, Mullen said. “We have learned this, some might argue, too slow­ly,” the admi­ral said. “We can­not kill our way to vic­to­ry. We must build our way there, by build­ing trust and con­fi­dence and good governance.” 

Today’s mil­i­tary com­man­ders also must be flex­i­ble in an age of irreg­u­lar war­fare, Mullen said, not­ing they may find them­selves deal­ing with peo­ple who were shoot­ing at them the day before. 

“Such is the nature of the diverse threat we face – a com­plex, adap­tive net­work of rad­i­cal and vio­lent ide­olo­gies that bind togeth­er dis­parate indi­vid­u­als, move­ments, orga­ni­za­tions and even states,” he said. “Not all extrem­ist groups share the same goals. Not all extrem­ists them­selves share the same ide­ol­o­gy. We must dif­fer­en­ti­ate and dis­tin­guish between them, divide them and turn them one against the other.” 

Pre­cise does not mean per­fect, the chair­man said, and being prin­ci­pled does not mean being uncom­pro­mis­ing. “What I am say­ing is that our use of force needs to be dis­crim­i­nate and pro­por­tion­al and in keep­ing with the ideals of the cit­i­zens and the coun­try we rep­re­sent,” he said. “Our endur­ing nation­al inter­ests are bound­ed by our val­ues, and our val­ues are reflect­ed in our con­duct. What we do must ever be in keep­ing with who we are.” 

Mullen empha­sized that the lines divid­ing con­ven­tion­al and irreg­u­lar war­fare are becom­ing blurred. 

“Future con­flict will like­ly be even more com­plex and our array of engage­ment will con­tin­ue to evolve,” he said. “I believe our invest­ments should be allo­cat­ed in a man­ner that rec­og­nizes this com­plex­i­ty and focus­es on capa­bil­i­ties that allow max­i­mum flex­i­bil­i­ty. It’s not about doing more with less. It’s about doing the right things with the right capabilities.” 

Main­tain­ing the edge in peo­ple, train­ing and tech­nol­o­gy will be more impor­tant than quan­ti­ty of sys­tems and long-term weapons sys­tems, the chair­man said. 

The future “favors respon­si­bil­i­ty and inno­va­tion in lead­ers, orga­ni­za­tion, tech­nol­o­gy – and in think­ing,” Mullen said. “It requires us not just to apply kinet­ic force pre­cise­ly – and when called for, deci­sive­ly – but to rec­og­nize the respon­si­bil­i­ty we have to use that force appropriately.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →