USA — Initiative Helps Leonard Wood Tornado Victims

WASHINGTON, Jan. 19, 2011 — When a dev­as­tat­ing tor­na­do struck Fort Leonard Wood, Mo., New Year’s Eve day, the Army Claims Ser­vice moved into over­drive to help res­i­dents of 159 hous­ing quar­ters that were dam­aged or destroyed get back on their feet.

Mak­ing good on Army Chief of Staff Gen. George W. Casey Jr.’s pledge as he toured the area four days after the storm, the lawyers and claims proces­sors pushed “busi­ness as usu­al” prac­tices to the back burn­er to pro­vide a faster and more com­pre­hen­sive response.

They waived some of the require­ments typ­i­cal­ly used to to sub­stan­ti­ate claims, paid vic­tims’ pri­vate insur­ance deductibles, short­ened the time­line for pro­cess­ing claims pay­ments and even autho­rized rental cars for vic­tims whose vehi­cles were dam­aged or destroyed, Hen­ry Nolan, chief of the Army Claims Service’s Per­son­nel Claims and Recov­ery Divi­sion, told Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice.

They also extend­ed to two years -– rather than the stan­dard 60 days –- the time vic­tims have to request that their set­tle­ment be increased based on evi­dence that their loss is greater than what has been paid.

Now, offi­cials plan to take what they’ve learned and insti­tu­tion­al­ize it to quick­ly draw on in the event that a sim­i­lar tragedy strikes again. And cit­ing inter­est from the Army’s sis­ter ser­vices, Nolan and his team plan to share their expe­ri­ences at a joint claims meet­ing lat­er this month, with hopes of see­ing a joint task force explore for­mal­iz­ing some of the ini­tia­tives mil­i­tary­wide.

“Hope­ful­ly, we will nev­er have to do this again,” Nolan said. “But when you have a sit­u­a­tion like this where you have mas­sive dam­age, and the claimants have lit­tle, if any, abil­i­ty to sub­stan­ti­ate their loss­es line by line, that’s when this could be avail­able.”

The pow­er­ful EF‑3 tor­na­do that moved through a pri­va­tized fam­i­ly hous­ing neigh­bor­hood at Fort Leonard Wood ear­ly Dec. 31 left a trail of destruc­tion in its wake. Of 159 affect­ed fam­i­ly hous­ing units, 51 were total­ly destroyed and more than 30 oth­ers received sub­stan­tial dam­age, Nolan report­ed. In addi­tion, more than 200 vehi­cles were dam­aged or destroyed. Mirac­u­lous­ly, no one was killed and four peo­ple received only minor injuries –- most like­ly, Nolan said, because many of the res­i­dents were away on leave for the hol­i­days.

When Casey toured the dam­aged areas, he offered high praise for the sol­diers and their fam­i­lies who sur­vived the storm, many by hud­dling in their clos­ets or bath­rooms, and the com­mu­ni­ty that ral­lied to sup­port them. “I found resilience and team­work among the sol­diers and their fam­i­lies and their com­mu­ni­ties,” he said.

Casey also said he could­n’t recall in his 40-plus years of ser­vice ever see­ing an Army instal­la­tion get hit so hard by a nat­ur­al dis­as­ter.

So when claims offi­cials got called to the scene, they knew they had a chal­lenge on their hands.

The Army Claims Ser­vice prob­a­bly is best known for help­ing mil­i­tary mem­bers and civil­ian Defense Depart­ment employ­ees get reim­bursed when their per­son­al prop­er­ty gets lost or dam­aged dur­ing per­ma­nent-change-of-sta­tion moves. Typ­i­cal­ly, the claims ser­vice seeks reim­burse­ment from the com­mer­cial mov­ing com­pa­ny respon­si­ble for the prop­er­ty, then pays out only what the car­ri­er does­n’t, in accor­dance with the Per­son­nel Claims Act, Nolan explained.

So when claims offi­cials began arriv­ing from Fort Leav­en­worth, Kan., and oth­er Army posts as well as Wash­ing­ton, D.C., to assist their coun­ter­parts at Fort Leonard Wood, they helped vic­tims assess their loss­es and file for reim­burse­ment, and arranged to expe­dite claims pay­ments made through the Defense Finance and Account­ing Ser­vice, Nolan said.

The offi­cials explained the best way for vic­tims to recov­er the biggest per­cent­age of their loss­es: by fil­ing claims first through the pri­vate com­pa­ny that man­ages the hous­ing area, then through their own per­son­al insur­ance com­pa­ny, then through the Army Claims Ser­vice.

“We have mon­e­tary lim­its we have to abide by, and if they come to us first, they are pret­ty much going to be lim­it­ed to those mon­e­tary lim­its, and they are not going to get much more from their pri­vate insur­ance or the [prop­er­ty man­age­ment company’s] insur­ance,” Nolan explained. “But if they pay first, then we can come in on the back of that and start our adju­di­ca­tion with the things that insur­ance does­n’t cov­er. So it has the poten­tial to pro­vide much more cov­er­age for them.”

Next, the offi­cials set out to help vic­tims sub­stan­ti­ate their loss­es — a par­tic­u­lar­ly dif­fi­cult task when an entire house and its con­tents have been destroyed. “Nor­mal­ly, when peo­ple file claims, they detail the loss, item per item. They line-item the loss with the val­ue when they bought it, how much it will take to replace it,” Nolan said. “The prob­lem is, when every­thing is destroyed, you lose your records, too, or you don’t have easy access to your records.”

So offi­cials looked to the insur­ance indus­try for ideas about how it oper­ates in sim­i­lar cir­cum­stances and began fine-tun­ing their own process­es for deter­min­ing the val­ue of lost prop­er­ty.

One idea, not yet used, is to track down the com­mer­cial car­ri­er that moved the fam­i­ly into the prop­er­ty to assess the inbound inven­to­ry list, Nolan said. Anoth­er is to use the autho­rized weight of the house­hold goods ship­ment to help come up with a val­ue.

Mean­while, the claims offi­cials part­nered with claimants and phys­i­cal­ly walked the grounds of their prop­er­ties. They jot­ted down details the vic­tims were able to recall about their prop­er­ty, took pho­tographs and did “what­ev­er they could to take the bur­den off the claimant to sub­stan­ti­ate the loss,” Nolan said.

To fur­ther sup­port the fam­i­lies, the claims offi­cials were able to relax some of the rules that typ­i­cal­ly gov­ern the claims process and get new author­i­ties to cov­er addi­tion­al loss­es.

For exam­ple, they received author­i­ty for vic­tims to request recon­sid­er­a­tion of a claim already paid up to two years after the inci­dent. Typ­i­cal­ly, this has to be done with­in 60 days after the claims office noti­fies them how much it will pay.

“This great­ly expand­ed that time, so they have more time to do it and don’t have to do it all right up front,” Nolan said.

The claims ser­vice also autho­rized 14 days of rental car pay­ments so fam­i­lies whose vehi­cles were dam­aged or destroyed could get theirs repaired or shop for new ones. “Nor­mal­ly we don’t pay for rental cars when a car has been dam­aged,” Nolan said. “But in this case, the dam­age was so wide­spread that we were able to jus­ti­fy tying in the rental car [costs] to the rest of the dam­age.”

The claims ser­vice also autho­rized pay­ments to cov­er the cost of the deductible on the claimant’s pri­vate insur­ance. “Nor­mal­ly, we don’t pay the deductible straight out. We adju­di­cate claims, and then, what­ev­er is not paid by the insur­ance com­pa­ny, we pay the dif­fer­ence,” Nolan said. “But in this case, it seemed ridicu­lous to require that. If you had insur­ance on your vehi­cle or per­son­al prop­er­ty and filed a claim [through that com­pa­ny], then we will pay the deductible.”

As it worked to make it eas­i­er for vic­tims to file claims and quick­ly processed claims it received, the Claims Ser­vice staff coor­di­nat­ed with the Defense Finance and Account­ing Ser­vice to expe­dite claims pay­ments.

DFAS’ stan­dard timetable is to make a direct deposit to the claimant’s bank account with­in 10 busi­ness days of receiv­ing an approved claim, Nolan said. How­ev­er, if the Claims Office approves a claim from a vic­tim of the Fort Leonard Wood tor­na­do by 3 p.m. EST on a giv­en busi­ness day, DFAS will make the pay­ment two busi­ness days lat­er. Nolan said these new ini­tia­tives embrace the spir­it of the Per­son­nel Claims Act.

“The pur­pose of the Per­son­nel Claims Act is to improve morale. And if you don’t make these pay­ments quick­ly and fair­ly, the impact on morale is going to be exact­ly oppo­site of what the act intend­ed,” he said.

“This is intend­ed to take care of folks for some­thing that hap­pened to them because of the nature of their mil­i­tary ser­vice,” he added. “To a great extent, it’s the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, all tak­ing care of their own.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →