USA — Departments Cooperate on Electronic Health Records

ARLINGTON, Va., June 14, 2010 — The nation may nev­er become entire­ly “paper­less” in the way it doc­u­ments patient med­ical records, but the mil­i­tary and vet­er­ans health care com­mu­ni­ties are on the right path and have the tech­nolo­gies in place to one day be very close, offi­cials said last week.

“There was a time that we did­n’t have any­thing real­ly elec­tron­ic,” Army Maj. Frank Tuck­er, a physician’s assis­tant and chief sys­tems archi­tect for the Mil­i­tary Health Sys­tems’ Joint Med­ical Infor­ma­tion Sys­tem, said at a June 11 elec­tron­ic health records open house held here. “But we’ve evolved from there with 100 per­cent deploy­ment of our out­pa­tient elec­tron­ic records … [and] are now on a path toward com­plet­ing [inpa­tient elec­tron­ic records] deployment.” 

Tuck­er was part of a pan­el at the event that dis­cussed advances and plans the Defense and Vet­er­ans Affairs depart­ments have in elec­tron­ic health records. The open house fea­tured some of the lat­est tools the mil­i­tary uses to dig­i­tal­ly input and track troops’ med­ical information. 

First respon­ders on the ground in Afghanistan now have the capa­bil­i­ty to process troop health infor­ma­tion from the heat of bat­tle to a the­ater-lev­el hos­pi­tal in real time. Data can be exchanged and updat­ed all the way up the chain to region­al facil­i­ties, such as Land­stuhl Region­al Med­ical Cen­ter in Ger­many, and to Wal­ter Reed Army Med­ical Cen­ter in Wash­ing­ton, D.C., before troops arrive for treatment. 

The mil­i­tary first deployed what it con­sid­ered basic elec­tron­ic health care records in 1996 under the Com­pos­ite Health Care Sys­tem, or CHCS. Every­thing from lab­o­ra­to­ry blood work, pre­scrip­tion med­ica­tions, X‑rays and appoint­ment sched­ul­ing were avail­able for out­pa­tient documentation. 

Through tech­nolo­gies such as the Armed Forces Health Lon­gi­tu­di­nal Tech­nol­o­gy sys­tem, also known as AHTLA, and CHCS before that, the mil­i­tary relied on paper files to doc­u­ment patient records. Troops injured in bat­tle were trans­port­ed with their hard-copy med­ical records, which some­times were out­dat­ed. That method often left health care providers with many unan­swered ques­tions as troops tran­si­tioned through dif­fer­ent lev­els of care, Tuck­er explained. 

Troops severe­ly injured in Iraq, for exam­ple, tran­si­tion to sev­er­al facil­i­ties dur­ing their treat­ment and recov­ery. Injured troops like­ly are seen at their unit aid sta­tion, then at a field hos­pi­tal and moved to a larg­er facil­i­ty, such as in Land­stuhl. Ser­vice­mem­bers then could move to Wal­ter Reed, and then would tran­si­tion to the VA health care sys­tem if they sep­a­rate from the military. 

It can be dif­fi­cult, Tuck­er said, to keep a per­fect record of every lab­o­ra­to­ry result — includ­ing pre­scrip­tions and treat­ments ser­vice­mem­bers receive when they’re injured — by the time they’re seen at a VA hos­pi­tal. Such short­falls could delay the care and ben­e­fits process, he explained. 

But today, the VA health sys­tem receives only elec­tron­ic records for ser­vice­mem­bers from the Defense Depart­ment, Dr. Ross Fletch­er, chief of staff for the VA Med­ical Cen­ter in Wash­ing­ton, D.C., said. 

Because of the tech­nolo­gies and inte­grat­ed elec­tron­ic records sys­tem the Defense Depart­ment and VA share, Fletch­er said, the VA will nev­er again file paper records. He explained that some elec­tron­ic doc­u­ments he sees may be scanned from paper files, but they’re elec­tron­ic by the time they’re passed to VA

The shared sys­tem is much eas­i­er and quick­er for his staff to help pro­vide the best pos­si­ble ser­vice for vet­er­ans, he said. And because of this capa­bil­i­ty, he added, the two orga­ni­za­tions are “very close” to becom­ing com­plete­ly paperless. 

“I think we’re very close,” he said. “If I see a record on a wound­ed war­rior in the imag­ing sys­tem, I see every­thing that the [pre­vi­ous mil­i­tary] doc­tor saw. As long as I’m see­ing every­thing that doc­tor saw, that’s a very com­plete record for me. 

“As it moves on and becomes elec­tron­ic to begin with,” he con­tin­ued, “it’s faster, much eas­i­er to make care hap­pen. I can look things up a lot eas­i­er. Elec­tron­ic health records we use are great now, but it will prob­a­bly be much bet­ter in 10 years as we evolve.” 

But a num­ber of fac­tors pre­vent the depart­ments from becom­ing com­plete­ly paper­less, sev­er­al pan­elists explained. 

On the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment side, Tuck­er cit­ed grow­ing fields of study, such as trau­mat­ic brain injury, and evolv­ing mis­sions troops take on, such as human­i­tar­i­an assis­tance, that are dif­fi­cult for fed­er­al health care providers to antic­i­pate. It’s a mat­ter of updat­ing soft­ware and deploy­ing sys­tems for med­ical per­son­nel, he said. 

This most­ly occurs when doc­u­ment­ing inpa­tient care, he said, adding that mil­i­tary providers also are required to doc­u­ment detainee patient records. 

“We still have some gaps; we are still find­ing those gaps as med­i­cine evolves,” Tuck­er said. “As those gaps turn into require­ments, we will pro­vide capa­bil­i­ties to doc­u­ment, elec­tron­i­cal­ly, those shortfalls.” 

In the civil­ian sec­tor, only 11 per­cent of med­ical facil­i­ties use elec­tron­ic records, and of those, their sys­tem stan­dards vary from those the mil­i­tary and VA use. So the rough­ly 50 per­cent of mil­i­tary mem­bers, vet­er­ans and their fam­i­lies who seek care out­side the mil­i­tary and VA sys­tems are unlike­ly to ben­e­fit from the tech­nol­o­gy, Army Col. Claude Hines Jr. said. 

“The prob­lem with­in the health care sec­tor today is the stan­dards with­in the nation,” said Hines, the deputy pro­gram exec­u­tive offi­cer of inno­va­tions and deliv­ery for the Joint Med­ical Infor­ma­tion Sys­tems. “[The Defense Depart­ment] and VA are shar­ing data based upon stan­dards we cre­at­ed togeth­er. The nation wants to move to a nation­al stan­dard. Regard­less of what the sys­tem is, as long as we fol­low the nation­al stan­dard, we should be able to share that data. 

“Also, when the doc­tor looks at that data, he has the assur­ance that it is cor­rect, and the integri­ty of that data is main­tained,” Hines added. 

Hines also point­ed out that unless those seek­ing care in the pri­vate sec­tor phys­i­cal­ly bring their records to the mil­i­tary or VA, it’s like­ly that data goes unno­ticed and doc­u­ment­ed. How­ev­er, ini­tia­tives are under way with­in the Defense Depart­ment to scan such records into their sys­tems, he said. 

Ulti­mate­ly, the long-term intent is for all health records to be shared, Tuck­er said, adding that troops should­n’t be hin­dered with try­ing to pro­vide proof of their con­di­tions or injuries. The goal is that their health infor­ma­tion be pro­vid­ed seam­less­ly with­out delay, he said. 

“Cer­tain­ly, there are a num­ber of improve­ments in infor­ma­tion we’d like to see that are shared between both depart­ments [and the civil­ian sec­tor] that does­n’t impede care and that does­n’t impede our abil­i­ty to deter­mine ben­e­fits,” Tuck­er said. “We do believe, as we move for­ward and get these oth­er pieces elec­tron­i­cal­ly shared with stan­dards, it will pro­vide greater val­ue to the over­all community.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →