USA — Chairman Calls for Military Self-examination

WASHINGTON, Jan. 10, 2011 — As the mil­i­tary enjoys tremen­dous sup­port from the Amer­i­can peo­ple, the chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said today, now is the time to step back, assess the impact of 10 years of war and ensure the insti­tu­tion remains on course.

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, open­ing a lead­er­ship con­fer­ence at the Nation­al Defense Uni­ver­si­ty at Fort McNair here, called for a proac­tive self-exam­i­na­tion –- insti­tu­tion­al­ly and as by indi­vid­ual lead­ers –- and appro­pri­ate course cor­rec­tions, as need­ed.

The chair­man called today’s all-day con­fer­ence — titled “Mil­i­tary Pro­fes­sion­al­ism: Intro­spec­tion and Reflec­tion on Basic Tenets and the Way Ahead” — “an oppor­tu­ni­ty to begin a con­ver­sa­tion and debate about who we are, what we have become, and how that match­es up to who we should be.”

“For some­thing like this, which is at the heart of who we are, we can’t do enough self-exam­i­na­tion,” he told the atten­dees, key lead­ers of the mil­i­tary edu­ca­tion and train­ing com­mu­ni­ty.

“This is not self-fla­gel­la­tion,” he added. “This is exam­i­na­tion to make sure we under­stand it and that we keep feed­ing it back to raise those who will lead, in the not-too-dis­tant future, our mil­i­tary and, in fact, our coun­try.”

Echo­ing a mes­sage Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates sent dur­ing a speech at Duke Uni­ver­si­ty in Sep­tem­ber, Mullen cit­ed a grow­ing chasm between the Amer­i­can peo­ple and the mil­i­tary that depends on their sup­port for its very sur­vival.

Gates not­ed dur­ing that speech that less than 1 per­cent of the U.S. pop­u­la­tion has shoul­dered the nation­al secu­ri­ty bur­den, and he expressed con­cern that Amer­i­cans are los­ing con­tact with those who make up its mil­i­tary.

Today, Mullen said that although most Amer­i­cans have tremen­dous good­will toward their men and women in uni­form, by and large they have lit­tle true con­nec­tion to who they are or what they rep­re­sent.

That’s a dan­ger­ous sit­u­a­tion for the mil­i­tary, which can’t sur­vive with­out pub­lic sup­port, Mullen said.

“Our under­pin­ning, our author­i­ties, every­thing we are, every­thing we do comes from the Amer­i­can peo­ple,” he said. “And we can­not afford to be out of touch with them. … To the degree we are out of touch, I think is a very dan­ger­ous course.”

The chair­man cit­ed changes in the Amer­i­can public’s per­cep­tion of the mil­i­tary dur­ing the span of his own career.

Dur­ing the 1970s, he said, the pub­lic large­ly blamed the mil­i­tary for fail­ures in Viet­nam, result­ing in deep orga­ni­za­tion­al scars that remain today. Then, dur­ing the 1980s, per­son­al account­abil­i­ty began to erode with­in the mil­i­tary, the chair­man told the group.

“We were much more focused on the image of who we were, the com­mu­ni­ca­tions of who we were, par­tic­u­lar­ly when things got tough,” Mullen said. “And I saw too many not stand up who should have stood up from an account­abil­i­ty stand­point. And it both­ered me to no end. … For me, account­abil­i­ty is at the heart of this.”

In the 1990s, inci­dents such as the Tail­hook scan­dal — sex­u­al mis­con­duct by offi­cers dur­ing a 1991 pri­vate orga­ni­za­tion con­ven­tion — exposed ques­tions about insti­tu­tion­al respon­si­bil­i­ty, Mullen said, and the impor­tance of putting the good of the mil­i­tary insti­tu­tion over that of indi­vid­u­als.

While declin­ing to speak about the recent fir­ing of the com­mand­ing offi­cer of the USS Enter­prise while an inves­ti­ga­tion con­tin­ues, Mullen said sit­u­a­tions like this under­score the need for self-assess­ment with­in the mil­i­tary.

“We have to have a true com­pass eth­i­cal­ly. We have to have a true com­pass moral­ly. We have to have a true com­pass inside our pro­fes­sion,” he said.

Mullen empha­sized that he has no rea­son to believe the mil­i­tary has devi­at­ed dra­mat­i­cal­ly from its “true com­pass,” but he urged lead­ers to act now to take stock of grad­ual changes with­in the orga­ni­za­tion.

Just as lead­ers learn from their suc­cess­es, he told the group, they also must learn the impor­tant lessons of their fail­ures. He not­ed “dif­fi­cult times” dur­ing the past 10 years when they may have faced moral or eth­i­cal chal­lenges, or sit­u­a­tions in which lead­ers fell short. He also rec­og­nized instances when the mil­i­tary has failed to live up to its respon­si­bil­i­ty to remain apo­lit­i­cal.

“There were things that were out­side who we are as a coun­try, who we are as a mil­i­tary,” he said. “The true mea­sure … is how you pick your­self up off the deck, dust your­self off, learn the lessons and move for­ward.

“It goes to this account­abil­i­ty dis­cus­sion,” he added. “All of this is tied to: ‘Who are we? What is our pro­fes­sion? What are the prin­ci­ples we care most about?’ ” Mullen said. “And in every­thing we do, we have got to keep those prin­ci­ples front and cen­ter –- for our­selves and for those that come along.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →