USA — Carter Outlines Plan to Help Warfighters, Taxpayers

WASHINGTON, Sept. 14, 2010 — The Defense Department’s $400 bil­lion-a-year sys­tem for buy­ing goods and ser­vices is about to under­go major changes designed to save tax­pay­er mon­ey with­out affect­ing mis­sion readi­ness, a senior Pen­ta­gon offi­cial said today.

“We’re ask­ing you to do more with­out more,” Ash­ton B. Carter, under­sec­re­tary of defense for acqui­si­tion, tech­nol­o­gy and logis­tics, said in a memo to his senior acqui­si­tions staff released today. 

Carter lat­er out­lined the plan at a news con­fer­ence with Pen­ta­gon reporters. It con­tains 23 areas of improve­ment to make the department’s pro­cure­ment offices and defense con­trac­tors more efficient. 

The pro­cure­ment changes are the first detailed announce­ment as part of Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates’ ini­tia­tive, announced last month, to save $100 bil­lion over the next five years with­out neg­a­tive­ly affect­ing warfighters. 

Under the changes, the depart­ment is to man­date afford­abil­i­ty in con­tracts and con­trol cost growth. No longer will major weapons sys­tems have to be can­celled after years in the mak­ing and bil­lions of dol­lars in cost over­runs have been spent, Gates said speak­ing before Carter at the news conference. 

Pro­cure­ment offi­cers will con­sid­er not only what goods and ser­vices cost, but what they should cost, Carter explained. An exam­ple is the F‑35 Light­ning II joint strike fight­er, for which the cost esti­mate bal­looned from $50 mil­lion in 2002 to $93 mil­lion this year, he said. The con­trac­tor lat­er agreed to absorb some costs. 

The SSBNX bal­lis­tic sub­ma­rine, the long-range strike sys­tem, the Army’s Ground Com­bat Sys­tem, and the Marine Corps pres­i­den­tial heli­copter all are exam­ples of sys­tems that are being pro­cured under the new rules, at a cost of about $200 bil­lion, he said. 

Carter used the sub­ma­rine as an exam­ple of the pos­si­bil­i­ty of sig­nif­i­cant cost sav­ings, say­ing the new sub’s price dropped from $7 bil­lion to $5 bil­lion after offi­cials reduced the scope of the design – some­thing he said engi­neers must do on the front end of projects. 

The new sys­tem will reward com­pa­nies that con­sis­tent­ly deliv­er afford­able sys­tems on time, and those that share in any nec­es­sary cost over­runs, he said. 

Con­trac­tors will now have to pro­duce sys­tems in a spec­i­fied and short­er time than has been allowed, Carter said. The con­tract for the F‑18 Hor­net fight­er jet, for exam­ple, has been set at five years, allow­ing for bet­ter man­age­ment and over­sight, he said. 

“These all the ways you get pro­duc­tiv­i­ty in an indus­tri­al activ­i­ty,” Carter said of the changes. 

In oth­er changes, pro­cure­ment offi­cers will: 

— Elim­i­nate redun­dan­cy in warfight­er portfolios; 

— Give indus­try incen­tives to reduce, rather than increase, costs; 

— Put process­es in place to ensure real competition; 

— Require open-sys­tem archi­tec­ture; and 

— Increase the role of small businesses. 

The changes will require par­tic­u­lar atten­tion to con­tract­ed ser­vices, an area that has grown sub­stan­tial­ly over the last 10 years to become a $200 bil­lion annu­al cost to the depart­ment, Carter said. “Half of our costs are for ser­vices, and we’re per­form­ing worse there,” he said. “It’s grown so large, we sim­ply have to man­age it better.” 

The depart­ment also will look inward to its “unpro­duc­tive bureau­crat­ic process­es,” Carter said, that waste time and resources and force unnec­es­sary costs on con­trac­tors. “We can’t leave our­selves out of this,” he said. “We con­tribute to low pro­duc­tiv­i­ty in the indus­try, and we need to step up and take respon­si­bil­i­ty for it.” 

Carter called the changes “very rea­son­able goals” that will ensure warfight­ers have what they need. “It’s entire­ly pos­si­ble to find $100 bil­lion [in sav­ings] in the $400 bil­lion we spend every year in con­tract­ing,” he added. 

Carter vowed to be “relent­less” in the imple­men­ta­tion of the goals, which he said are very spe­cif­ic and mea­sur­able. He added that he will over­see progress dai­ly and will pro­vide progress reports to Gates monthly. 

“To those who hes­i­tate, to those who fear to go down this path, they need to con­sid­er the alter­na­tive: bro­ken promis­es, can­celled pro­grams, unpre­dictabil­i­ty and uncer­tain­ty that is bad for indus­try, erodes tax­pay­er con­fi­dence, and worst of all, results in lost warfight­er capa­bil­i­ties,” he said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →