USA — Biometrics Shows Increasing Promise On, Off Battlefield

WASHINGTON — Con­sid­ered a bat­tle­field curios­i­ty just a few years ago, bio­met­rics has become rec­og­nized as a vital warfight­ing capa­bil­i­ty. Now, defense offi­cials see the same tech­nol­o­gy as a key to help­ing the Defense Depart­ment make its busi­ness prac­tices more effi­cient.

Biometrics has important battlefield applications, Biometrics Automated Tool Set system
Bio­met­rics has impor­tant bat­tle­field appli­ca­tions. In this 2007 pho­to, Army Sgt. Tim­o­thy Box and Cpl. Ben Web­ber use the Bio­met­rics Auto­mat­ed Tool Set sys­tem to hold infor­ma­tion on the vol­un­teers who sign up to become secu­ri­ty guards in Taji, Iraq.
U.S. Air Force pho­to by Senior Air­man Steve Czyz
Click to enlarge

Bio­met­rics – the sci­ence of using unique phys­i­cal and behav­ioral char­ac­ter­is­tics to iden­ti­fy a per­son – has proven to be invalu­able to the warfighter’s tool­box, Myra S. Gray, direc­tor of the Army’s Bio­met­rics Iden­ti­ty Man­age­ment Agency, told Amer­i­can Forces Press Service. 

“Five years ago, it was some­thing very new, and the capa­bil­i­ty was­n’t ful­ly under­stood. It was kind of an add-on to the mis­sion,” she said. “Now it’s an inte­gral part of the mis­sion because peo­ple have seen the val­ue that it brings.” 

Gray’s office, known as the Bio­met­rics Task Force until it was redes­ig­nat­ed in March, is respon­si­ble for cap­i­tal­iz­ing on bio­met­rics tech­nol­o­gy and pro­mot­ing new advances to ben­e­fit the entire Defense Department. 

Fin­ger­prints and oth­er per­son­al­ly iden­ti­fy­ing fea­tures such as a person’s dis­tinct iris, facial, palm and voice fea­tures have become par­tic­u­lar­ly help­ful in the intel­li­gence and law enforce­ment are­nas, she said. 

They help com­bat troops tell friends from foes and iden­ti­fy poten­tial ter­ror­ists before it’s too late. They also pro­vide a fool­proof way to put names and faces to insur­gent activ­i­ties and to iden­ti­fy released detainees who have returned to ter­ror­ist activity. 

“You can iden­ti­fy an indi­vid­ual and asso­ciate him with cer­tain actions,” Gray said. “You can fig­ure out who some­one asso­ci­at­ed with and what they have been involved in. You can link events such as an [impro­vised explo­sive device] at one place and a protest at anoth­er. You build a pic­ture of what has gone on.” 

Mean­while, bio­met­rics has become a vital tool in vet­ting peo­ple in the com­bat zone before they’re grant­ed access “inside the wire,” or into secure or sen­si­tive facil­i­ties. “We want to make sure that the peo­ple we per­mit onto our facil­i­ties are not the same peo­ple putting IEDs down,” Gray explained. 

Bio­met­rics also is wide­ly employed beyond the com­bat zone to con­trol access to mil­i­tary facil­i­ties world­wide. For exam­ple, every mil­i­tary mem­ber, fam­i­ly mem­ber and Defense Depart­ment civil­ian employ­ee has a com­mon access iden­ti­fi­ca­tion card that’s embed­ded with their fingerprints. 

But oth­er bio­met­ric tech­nolo­gies are in wide use through­out the mil­i­tary. At Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., for exam­ple, the Air Force uses a device that “reads” hand prints to clear vet­er­ans receiv­ing treat­ment at the Vet­er­ans Affairs clin­ic for access to the base hos­pi­tal. At Fort Belvoir, Va., the Army uses iris scan­ning tech­nol­o­gy to pro­vide key­less entry to sen­si­tive areas. And the Navy reg­u­lar­ly uses bio­met­rics equip­ment to con­firm iden­ti­fies as they board for­eign vessels. 

Gray antic­i­pates broad­er use of this capa­bil­i­ty mil­i­tary-wide, par­tic­u­lar­ly as the tech­nol­o­gy becomes increas­ing­ly faster, high­er-qual­i­ty and less obtrusive. 

Among the more promis­ing tech­nolo­gies the Defense Depart­ment is explor­ing are bio­met­ric sys­tems able to scan peo­ple “on the move” with­out requir­ing them to touch any­thing or even stop. Com­mer­cial air­ports see this as a great way to elim­i­nate long back-up lines at secu­ri­ty checkpoints. 

But Gray also rec­og­nizes warfight­ing appli­ca­tions, par­tic­u­lar­ly at bor­der cross­ings and oth­er ports of entry where there’s a mass move­ment of peo­ple and insur­gents might try to blend in undetected. 

“Those same ports of entry that legit­i­mate busi­ness peo­ple or fam­i­ly mem­bers are cross­ing are the same places that the insur­gents come across,” she said. “By hav­ing this tech­nol­o­gy, you will have the abil­i­ty to fer­ret out those who are hid­ing amongst the pop­u­lace with­out neg­a­tive­ly impact­ing the population.” 

Mean­while, Gray antic­i­pates broad­er use of bio­met­rics off the bat­tle­field, par­tic­u­lar­ly as the depart­ment acts on Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates’ man­date to improve efficiency. 

“The next big step for­ward in bio­met­rics is def­i­nite­ly going to be in the busi­ness process are­na,” she said. “It is tru­ly a cross-cut­ting capa­bil­i­ty” she said can be applied in “a whole spec­trum of func­tions, from the med­ical field to per­son­nel to finan­cial fields.” 

Bio­met­rics can go a long way in stream­lin­ing record­keep­ing, improv­ing infor­ma­tion-shar­ing and cut­ting out fraud – not only for the Defense Depart­ment, but for the U.S. gov­ern­ment as a whole, she said. 

“We have a lot of ben­e­fits and a lot of ser­vices in which we rely on iden­ti­fy­ing some­one so we can prop­er­ly pro­vide them what they need,” Gray explained. 

She cit­ed just a few ways bio­met­rics would improve the inter-depart­ment shar­ing that sup­ports those ben­e­fits and ser­vices. Bio­met­rics could help the Defense Depart­ment share mil­i­tary med­ical records with the VA, civil­ian employ­ee records with the Office of Per­son­nel Man­age­ment and employ­ee ben­e­fit records with the Social Secu­ri­ty Administration. 

“The big ques­tion is, ‘How do we pull that thread of iden­ti­ty to make sure we are more effi­cient as the U.S. gov­ern­ment in pro­vid­ing ser­vices?’ ” Gray said. “By inte­grat­ing that across the U.S. gov­ern­ment, we can find great efficiency.” 

Under­ly­ing this effort, she empha­sized, is “a com­plete and total focus on pri­va­cy” that ensures all per­son­al­ly iden­ti­fy­ing infor­ma­tion is pro­tect­ed in accor­dance with the Pri­va­cy Act. 

“This is one of the foun­da­tions as we build this sys­tem,” Gray said. “We are build­ing these sys­tems with a strong focus on mak­ing sure we are with­in the guide­lines of the law and pol­i­cy in pro­tect­ing that infor­ma­tion. That is para­mount. We can’t com­pro­mise on that.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →