USA — Air Force Races Ahead as Scientific Field Levels Out

WASHINGTON, Sept. 16, 2010 — The world is flat­ten­ing because engi­neer­ing capa­bil­i­ties are becom­ing more and more wide­ly avail­able, the Air Force’s chief sci­en­tist said this week.

That pos­es a sig­nif­i­cant chal­lenge to the Unit­ed States, because tech­nolo­gies that were once pure­ly in the realm of top-lev­el mil­i­tary research and devel­op­ment are now in the hands of more and more allies and poten­tial ene­mies, Wern­er J.A. Dahm said dur­ing a Sept. 13 “DoD Live” blog­gers round­table.

“There is, I would say, greater risk as a result of that,” he said. “The num­ber of peers and near-peers who we could poten­tial­ly face over the next 20 years and beyond is cer­tain­ly going to grow. The world, as we say, is flat­ten­ing from a sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy and engi­neer­ing-derived-capa­bil­i­ties per­spec­tive.”

And the Unit­ed States is not going to be able to stop the world from flat­ten­ing, he added.

“That is a one-way train that is going to con­tin­ue, and we rec­og­nize that, and it is irre­versible,” he said. “And it’s the Air Force’s chal­lenge to main­tain its tech­no­log­i­cal supe­ri­or­i­ty in that envi­ron­ment.”

Dahm also dis­cussed key find­ings and sum­ma­rized major ele­ments con­tained in the recent­ly com­plet­ed Air Force Tech­nol­o­gy Hori­zons effort. Tech­nol­o­gy Hori­zons is vision that will be used to focus Air Force Sci­ence and Tech­nol­o­gy efforts in the com­ing decades.

Air Force Sec­re­tary Michael B. Don­ley announced at this year’s Air Force Asso­ci­a­tion con­fer­ence that the com­ple­tion of Tech­nol­o­gy Hori­zons is one of the Air Forces’ major accom­plish­ments this year. The project was announced pub­licly at last year’s con­fer­ence.

“The major find­ings of Tech­nol­o­gy Hori­zons are, first of all, that the Air Force is going to have to do far broad­er and deep­er use of autonomous sys­tems and process­es to get man­pow­er effi­cien­cies, which we des­per­ate­ly need,” Dahm said, “as well as capa­bil­i­ty increas­es to meet some of the chal­lenges we face.”

The increase in use of aug­men­ta­tion does­n’t end at using remote-con­trolled or com­put­er-con­trolled vehi­cles or weapons, Dahm said. The sec­ond major find­ing is that the mil­i­tary is going to have to con­duct fur­ther research into human per­for­mance aug­men­ta­tion and human-machine cou­pling.

“To get many of the ben­e­fits of greater use of autonomous sys­tems and process­es,” he said, “we will also need to go much deep­er into human-machine cou­pling, as opposed to human-machine inter­faces — since humans are rec­og­nized as becom­ing increas­ing­ly less well matched in terms of their nat­ur­al capac­i­ties to the demands that tech­nol­o­gy has — and then final­ly even going so far as direct aug­men­ta­tion of humans using tech­nolo­gies in some cas­es devel­oped from the world of pros­thet­ics and else­where.”

Dahm said the third major find­ing was the neces­si­ty for devel­op­ment of tech­nol­o­gy to allow more free­dom of oper­a­tions in con­test­ed areas.

“Those include quan­tum-inter­fer­om­e­try approach­es to pro­vide us GPS-like capa­bil­i­ties for [posi­tion­ing, nav­i­ga­tion and tim­ing], even in GPS-denied envi­ron­ments,” he said, “a shift from cyber defense to cyber resilience using tech­nolo­gies for mas­sive vir­tu­al­iza­tion, and then final­ly, tech­nolo­gies for elec­tro­mag­net­ic spec­trum dom­i­nance in the increas­ing­ly crowd­ed and con­test­ed [elec­tro­mag­net­ic] envi­ron­ment that we work in.”

The Air Force has the means to keep its posi­tion as a tech­nol­o­gy leader, Dahm said — it’s sim­ply going to be a dif­fer­ent game to play in the future. While the hier­ar­chy of tech­no­log­i­cal dom­i­nance lev­els out, he said, the Air Force will have to work hard­er to stay ahead of its adver­saries.

“I think our job as an Air Force, through efforts like Tech­nol­o­gy Hori­zons, is to in effect stay ahead of the curve in order to have a bet­ter, a clear­er, a sharp­er under­stand­ing of where those dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly valu­able tech­nolo­gies are, both on the oppor­tu­ni­ty side for the U.S. Air Force and the broad­er joint force, as well as on the threat side, those tech­nolo­gies that would be dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly valu­able to our poten­tial adver­saries,” Dahm said.

“I think we can avoid tech­nol­o­gy sur­prise, or at least we can min­i­mize the risk of it, through efforts like Tech­nol­o­gy Hori­zons that allow the Air Force to step back from its day-to-day nar­row­er look at the tech­nol­o­gy land­scape and real­ly look from the 65,000-foot view over, say, a decade-long peri­od and assess where the great oppor­tu­ni­ties and risks are, and then pre­pare itself to address those risks,” he added.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →