Undersea Forces Critical to Future Defense, Commander Says

GROTON, Conn., Nov. 21, 2011 — Under­sea forces will become increas­ing­ly impor­tant to the nation’s defense and in exert­ing mil­i­tary influ­ence in the future, the com­man­der of Sub­ma­rine Group 2 said here last week.

Navy Rear Adm. Rick Breck­en­ridge pro­vid­ed his insights after a Nov. 17 vis­it here from Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta, who called Gro­ton “the home of our sub­ma­rine force” and the “sub­ma­rine cap­i­tal of the world.”

“It’s the orig­i­nal home of the Nau­tilus, and it is, from my point of view, one of the very impor­tant ele­ments of our nation­al defense that you guys are doing,” Panet­ta said. Breck­en­ridge ulti­mate­ly has oper­a­tional author­i­ty of all attack sub­marines in the Atlantic region.

“There are three squadrons here in Gro­ton, Conn., and there’s one squadron in Nor­folk, Va.,” the admi­ral said. “There used to be two, but we just con­sol­i­dat­ed to one squadron of ships in Nor­folk, Va.”

Breck­en­ridge also over­sees the build­ing of addi­tions to the under­sea force and ensures the man­ning, train­ing and equip­ping of sub­marines for avail­abil­i­ty to U.S. com­bat­ant com­man­ders.

Sub­marines have been crit­i­cal to nation­al defense in the past and con­tin­ue to remain rel­e­vant in today’s fight, the admi­ral said.

“If you look at his­to­ri­an records, many will claim that it was the under­sea forces that won the war in the Pacif­ic, espe­cial­ly, at least, until we were able to get the sur­face forces back up and on their feet,” he said, refer­ring to events fol­low­ing the Japan­ese attack on Pearl Har­bor, which launched the Unit­ed States into World War II.

Sub­marines have been used in oper­a­tions as recent­ly as Oper­a­tion Odyssey Dawn, Breck­en­ridge not­ed. “With the Unit­ed Nations char­ter, our forces were sent in to soft­en up the air defens­es of Libya to allow the flow of oth­er forces,” he said.

“This gets back [to the] prin­ci­ple [that if] we don’t have supe­ri­or­i­ty in the air to have our way at the onset of a cri­sis, we’re going to need some­body who can pen­e­trate the defens­es and soft­en up the adver­sary so then we can flow those oth­er forces in to estab­lish air dom­i­nance,” he said. “So in the onset of that cam­paign, we, the under­sea forces, were called upon to attack land tar­gets in Libya.”

Breck­en­ridge laud­ed the per­for­mance of one of the Navy’s attack sub­marines dur­ing the NATO-led oper­a­tion.

“The USS Flori­da was called upon to be one of the shoot­ers in Oper­a­tion Odyssey Dawn against Libya,” he said. “They launched over 90 Tom­a­hawk cruise mis­siles with eye-water­ing, flaw­less per­for­mance. Nev­er before in the his­to­ry of the Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca has one ship con­duct­ed that much land attack strikes, con­ven­tion­al­ly, in one short time peri­od. And we did it from under­sea.”

In addi­tion to the USS Flori­da, the USS Prov­i­dence and USS Scran­ton, both Sub­ma­rine Group 2 boats, also par­tic­i­pat­ed in the Libyan strike, Vice Adm. William E. Gort­ney, direc­tor of the Joint Staff, said March 19.

Breck­en­ridge not­ed that under­sea forces have pro­vid­ed a pres­ence dur­ing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and he spoke about future chal­lenges due to declin­ing force struc­ture.

“If we pull out of Afghanistan, does that mean I don’t need as many sub­marines in [U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand]?” he asked. “You might say, ‘Yes this is going to be good, even for the under­sea forces. … It’s time for us to pull back and send those sub­marines to oth­er areas they need to go.’

“The real­i­ty is, from my view­point … [that] as we remove our land forces from that region, the only thing that is going to pro­vide sta­bil­i­ty in the future from a poten­tial aggres­sor, like say an Iran, is going to be our mar­itime forces,” Breck­en­ridge added.

The admi­ral referred to this con­cept as “region­al mar­itime denial.”

“The need to have under­sea forces, not only remains, but per­haps, increas­es to pro­vide a coun­ter­bal­ance to make sure no aggres­sive action is tak­en in the­ater as we with­draw from Afghanistan,” he said. “So there’s going to be a greater bur­den placed on the Navy, at large, and again, from an under­sea, asym­met­ric val­ue per­spec­tive, I think there’s going to be a greater demand for under­sea forces to pro­vide a coun­ter­bal­ance there.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →