UK Defence Secretary — why we are in Afghanistan

Fol­low­ing the loss of six sol­diers in Afghanistan this week, Defence Sec­re­tary Philip Ham­mond writes about why we are in Afghanistan and what is being achieved there.

 -
The Sec­re­tary of State for Defence, Philip Ham­mond [Pic­ture: Har­land Quar­ring­ton, Crown Copyright/MOD 2011]
Source: Min­istry of Defence, UK
Click to enlarge

The brave men and women who defend this nation know they can­not do their job with­out being in harm’s way. It is what they are trained and equipped for. But noth­ing can tru­ly pre­pare fam­i­ly and friends for the loss of a loved one.

Every death, every injury, reminds us of the human cost to ser­vice in the Armed Forces. The shock­ing loss of British lives this week — the worst for many years — under­stand­ably rais­es ques­tions about the con­tin­ued pres­ence of UK forces in Afghanistan; about why we are there and what we are achiev­ing.

I am clear about the answers to those ques­tions: the mis­sion is nec­es­sary for nation­al secu­ri­ty. UK forces, and troops from 49 oth­er nations, are pre­vent­ing Afghanistan again being used by Al-Qae­da and oth­er ter­ror­ists as a base to plan attacks against the UK and our allies. We are fight­ing there to pre­vent them attack­ing us here.

Of course, address­ing the ter­ror­ist threat in Afghanistan is not the whole solu­tion, any more than the killing of Osama bin Laden in Pak­istan has extin­guished Al-Qae­da. But we have got to make sure that Afghanistan is secure and that the ter­ror­ists who thrive in chaos can­not re-estab­lish their pre‑9/11 train­ing camps.

The rein­vig­o­ra­tion of cam­paign strat­e­gy in the last few years is achiev­ing our aims — build­ing the capa­bil­i­ty of the Afghan Gov­ern­ment to main­tain its own secu­ri­ty, and by exten­sion pro­tect ours.

“I under­stand it when peo­ple ques­tion our con­tin­ued pres­ence in Afghanistan … But our nation­al secu­ri­ty requires us to see the job through.”
Philip Ham­mond

We’re not there to impose a west­ern lib­er­al democ­ra­cy in Afghanistan, but an endur­ing solu­tion in Afghanistan that meets the needs of UK nation­al secu­ri­ty and must encom­pass all its dif­fer­ent peo­ples. Secu­ri­ty must be linked with progress on devel­op­ment and gov­er­nance, and, cru­cial­ly, with a sus­tain­able polit­i­cal set­tle­ment. But, to be suc­cess­ful, the Afghan Gov­ern­ment must be able to nego­ti­ate from a posi­tion of strength.

Build­ing up the strength of the Afghan Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Forces [ANSF] is a cen­tral part of this. We are train­ing them, men­tor­ing them, oper­at­ing along­side them, and then steadi­ly draw­ing back as their capa­bil­i­ty improves. As they step up, we can step back.

This strat­e­gy is demon­stra­bly work­ing. The ANSF are now over 320,000-strong and well on course to meet their full strength tar­gets. There remain spe­cif­ic chal­lenges, but the capa­bil­i­ty and qual­i­ty of ANSF per­son­nel is improv­ing all the time. This has enabled the Afghans to take lead respon­si­bil­i­ty for secu­ri­ty pro­vi­sion for about half of the pop­u­la­tion of Afghanistan.

The Afghan Gov­ern­ment is prepar­ing to announce the next tranche of tran­si­tion, demon­strat­ing both the suc­cess of the process and their com­mit­ment to tak­ing respon­si­bil­i­ty for their own secu­ri­ty.

Cen­tral Hel­mand, where the major­i­ty of British troops oper­ate, is a par­tic­u­lar suc­cess sto­ry. Despite the ter­ri­ble events of this week, the over­all trend of suc­cess­ful attacks and UK casu­al­ty num­bers are sharply down.

“Walk­ing away is not an option. I know that our nation will con­tin­ue to stand by our Armed Forces and the sac­ri­fices they and their fam­i­lies make.”
Philip Ham­mond

By mid-2013, the Afghans are expect­ed to be lead­ing secu­ri­ty pro­vi­sion across the whole of the coun­try, with ISAF in sup­port. By the end of 2014 British troops will be able to end their com­bat role com­plete­ly. British troops will remain to train the ANSF, but in much few­er num­bers. And we will help to finance the Afghan forces as part of the inter­na­tion­al effort.

The insur­gency remains a nation­wide threat, capa­ble of under­min­ing progress, and parts of Hel­mand itself remain dan­ger­ous and some­times dead­ly as this week’s events have shown. So I under­stand it when peo­ple ques­tion our con­tin­ued pres­ence in Afghanistan and want the sac­ri­fice being made by our Armed Forces to come to an end imme­di­ate­ly.

But our nation­al secu­ri­ty requires us to see the job through and we owe it to the all-too-many who have sac­ri­ficed their lives to see this mis­sion suc­cess­ful­ly con­clud­ed. This is a volatile region from which threats to Britain and our allies may con­tin­ue to emerge.

Walk­ing away is not an option. I know that our nation will con­tin­ue to stand by our Armed Forces and the sac­ri­fices they and their fam­i­lies make.

Press release
Min­istry of Defence, UK

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →