Study Examines Dwell Times, Mental Health Issues

WASHINGTON — Ser­vice mem­bers who spend more time at home between deploy­ments may have a greater chance of being diag­nosed with a men­tal health dis­or­der than those with briefer dwell times, a Defense Depart­ment analy­sis has revealed, but offi­cials urge fur­ther research.

The study, con­duct­ed by the Armed Forces Health Sur­veil­lance Cen­ter, revealed that the per­cent­age of ser­vice mem­bers diag­nosed with men­tal health dis­or­ders after repeat deploy­ments � their sec­ond through fifth — increased as dwell times pri­or to the deploy­ments length­ened, sur­veil­lance cen­ter offi­cials explained. The report, they not­ed, reflects only data for ser­vice mem­bers who sought help and received a med­ical­ly diag­nosed men­tal health con­di­tion from cre­den­tialed providers.

These results, pub­lished in the Med­ical Sur­veil­lance Month­ly Report, are based on data from the Defense Med­ical Sur­veil­lance Sys­tem span­ning an eight-year peri­od. The study encom­passed more than 1 mil­lion male and more than 150,000 female active-duty ser­vice mem­bers who deployed at least once in sup­port of oper­a­tions Endur­ing Free­dom, Iraqi Free­dom or New Dawn.

The report’s authors offered some pos­si­ble rea­sons behind the dwell time find­ings. Longer dwell times may offer ser­vice mem­bers the oppor­tu­ni­ty to com­plete­ly read­just to being home, they sug­gest­ed. It then may be more dif­fi­cult to tran­si­tion back to a war­rior mind­set on the next deploy­ment. In con­trast, ser­vice mem­bers who are home for a brief time may not ful­ly adjust and, as a result, are bet­ter able to psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly han­dle sub­se­quent deploy­ments.

Anoth­er pos­si­bil­i­ty for the find­ing, they sug­gest, is that some ser­vice mem­bers may tem­porar­i­ly be unable to deploy again or may be delayed due to a med­ical con­di­tion, such as a men­tal health dis­or­der, which can result in a longer dwell time. In these cas­es, an increase in men­tal health dis­or­ders cor­re­lates with a longer dwell time, they not­ed, but one does­n’t nec­es­sar­i­ly cause the oth­er.

Air Force Col. Christo­pher Robin­son, deputy direc­tor of psy­cho­log­i­cal health for the Defense Cen­ters of Excel­lence for Psy­cho­log­i­cal Health and Trau­mat­ic Brain Injury, offered his own inter­pre­ta­tion of the data. He sug­gest­ed that the longer ser­vice mem­bers are home, the more like­ly they are to seek ser­vices or that a spouse or friend will encour­age them to seek help.

Ser­vice mem­bers who have rel­a­tive­ly short dwell times tend to keep their guard up, he explained, and may cov­er up symp­toms or slough off sug­ges­tions to seek help know­ing they’re soon to deploy. But, the “longer they’re home and con­nect with peo­ple, the greater the chance some­one will tell them they’re drink­ing too much or they seem depressed, if that is indeed the case,” he said.

“Rather than think­ing that longer dwell times caus­es more men­tal health diag­noses, I’d rather think that longer dwell times give ser­vice mem­bers time to seek help appro­pri­ate­ly,” Robin­son said. This fits in with the data, he added, since it only reflects ser­vice mem­bers who received med­ical diag­noses of a men­tal health con­di­tion from a cre­den­tialed provider.

“I still stand by the notion that longer dwell times are help­ful for the health of our ser­vice mem­bers,” the doc­tor not­ed, cit­ing results from the 2009 and 2011 Men­tal Health Assess­ment Tools. MHAT teams sur­veyed behav­ioral health per­son­nel in-the­ater, who con­curred that longer dwell times could result in less men­tal health prob­lems and bet­ter morale.

The study also showed an increase in the num­ber of ser­vice mem­bers with diag­nosed men­tal health con­di­tions after the first deploy­ment and through the third, and then a gen­er­al decline in the num­ber of ser­vice mem­bers with men­tal health dis­or­ders on sub­se­quent deploy­ments. This find­ing is inter­est­ing, the report’s authors said, since peo­ple often have the impres­sion that deploy­ments have a cumu­la­tive effect, mean­ing the more ser­vice mem­bers deploy, the more prob­lems they’re like­ly to have.

Robin­son said this may be due to what he calls the “resilience effect.” The more ser­vice mem­bers deploy, he explained, the more they know what to expect and are bet­ter able to weath­er adver­si­ty.

The data also may be reflect­ing the fact that peo­ple who stay in the ser­vice and take on repeat deploy­ments already have the resilience to weath­er chal­lenges. Oth­ers may choose to leave the ser­vice or are held back from repeat deploy­ments due to diag­nosed men­tal health con­di­tions.

Oth­er results includ­ed high­er per­cent­ages of ser­vice mem­bers in health care careers being diag­nosed with post-trau­mat­ic stress dis­or­der. The pro­por­tion of health care work­ers with PTSD increased more sharply than those in com­bat occu­pa­tions, the report revealed. In some cas­es, offi­cials sug­gest­ed, med­ical work­ers may be exposed to death and injury on more con­stant basis than those in com­bat occu­pa­tions, and, as a result, are more sus­cep­ti­ble to men­tal health issues.

Addi­tion­al­ly, younger ser­vice mem­bers and female ser­vice mem­bers were diag­nosed with a men­tal health con­di­tion more fre­quent­ly than their old­er coun­ter­parts.

This may be due to the fact that, as peo­ple age, they have bet­ter cop­ing mech­a­nisms, Robin­son said. “As we age and mature, there is more of a chance that bad things can hap­pen,” he explained, and as a result peo­ple build resilience by mak­ing it through these chal­leng­ing events. “That’s what resilience is — fac­ing adver­si­ty with courage and for­ti­tude.”

As for the gen­der-relat­ed find­ing, women in gen­er­al are more like­ly to seek men­tal health care than men, the report said. This does­n’t mean they’re less resilient, Robin­son not­ed, but that females tend to seek care more often.

Over­all, the find­ings bear a clos­er look, Robin­son said. The fact that some of the results were unex­pect­ed, such as the dwell time issue, only under­scores that need. Oth­er find­ings, such as the increas­ing rates of men­tal health issues among health care providers, can help the Defense Depart­ment bet­ter tai­lor pro­grams and address a grow­ing need.

The analy­sis, Robin­son not­ed, also points to the impor­tance of seek­ing men­tal health care with­out fear of reper­cus­sion.

Per­haps one of the rea­sons the data is show­ing an increase in men­tal health dis­or­ders, he sug­gest­ed, is that more peo­ple are seek­ing help with­out fear of career reper­cus­sion. Offi­cials will con­tin­ue to work to com­bat the stig­ma of seek­ing help, he added, through edu­ca­tion and aware­ness.

“We know that com­bat expo­sure is a risk fac­tor for some of these prob­lems,” Robin­son said. “We need to rec­og­nize that and make sure to pro­vide ser­vices for these ser­vice mem­bers and these fam­i­lies, and put out a con­sis­tent mes­sage of the impor­tance of seek­ing help.

“The ear­li­er we get help the bet­ter,” he added. “The longer we wait the worse things typ­i­cal­ly become.”

Ser­vice mem­bers and their fam­i­ly mem­bers who need men­tal health care can access many online resources to help iden­ti­fy and address issues, Robin­son said, such as Afterdeployment.org, and the Real War­riors Cam­paign. They also can con­tact a chap­lain, health care provider or a super­vi­sor.

“Suf­fer­ing in silence is not the way to go,” he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →