Sensor Network Detects Nuclear Blasts Worldwide

WASHINGTON, July 12, 2011 — At any time of the day or night, on any day of the year, if a nuclear device explodes any­where on Earth, a Defense Depart­ment net­work estab­lished in 1947 will know about it.

Air Force's WC-135 Constant Phoenix aircraft
The Air Force’s WC-135 Con­stant Phoenix air­craft col­lects air sam­ples from areas around the world where nuclear explo­sions have occurred.
U.S. Air Force pho­to
Click to enlarge

That was the year Army Gen. Dwight D. Eisen­how­er direct­ed the Army Air Corps to devel­op such a capa­bil­i­ty, and the U.S. Atom­ic Ener­gy Detec­tion Sys­tem has evolved over 64 years into a one-of-a-kind glob­al web of sen­sors that see, feel, hear and sniff out nuclear explo­sions that occur under land or sea, in the atmos­phere or in space. 

The Air Force detec­tion sys­tem and the job of mon­i­tor­ing three nuclear treaties — the 1963 Lim­it­ed Test Ban Treaty, the 1974 Thresh­old Test Ban Treaty and the 1976 Peace­ful Nuclear Explo­sions Treaty — in 1980 became a respon­si­bil­i­ty of the U.S. Air Force Tech­ni­cal Appli­ca­tions Cen­ter, called AFTAC, at Patrick Air Force Base, Fla. 

When the sys­tem detects a nuclear event, AFTAC sci­en­tists ana­lyze it and report find­ings to nation­al com­mand author­i­ties through U.S. Air Force headquarters. 

David O’Brien is AFTAC’s chief scientist. 

“Our respon­si­bil­i­ty is to ensure that for­eign nations are adher­ing to the pro­vi­sions of those treaties,” O’Brien told Amer­i­can Forces Press Service. 

To mon­i­tor the atmos­phere and space, he said, the U.S. Atom­ic Ener­gy Detec­tion Sys­tem, called USAEDS, has sen­sors aboard more than 20 satel­lites that make up the Glob­al Posi­tion­ing Sys­tem and the infrared-sens­ing satel­lites that make up the Defense Sup­port Program. 

“The lat­ter,” O’Brien said, “are what the Unit­ed States uses to detect launch­es of inter­con­ti­nen­tal bal­lis­tic missiles.” 

Mul­ti­ple sen­sors on all those satel­lites “look for phe­nom­e­nol­o­gy from a nuclear explo­sion that occurs in space or in the atmos­phere,” he added, “whether it’s nuclear radi­a­tion or the flash from the fireball.” 

The network’s five hydroa­coustic sta­tions detect under­sea nuclear explosions. 

“Those are just under­wa­ter micro­phones, and they lis­ten for the explo­sion that goes off under­wa­ter,” the sci­en­tist said. “By detect­ing the explo­sions on more than one under­wa­ter micro­phone, we can tri­an­gu­late where it occurred.” 

But the work­horse since the treaties came into effect to ban atmos­pher­ic nuclear test­ing, O’Brien said, has been the under­ground nuclear mon­i­tor­ing capability. 

“Those sen­sors are seis­mic, and the rea­son they’re seis­mic is that when a large explo­sion occurs under­ground, it cre­ates a sig­na­ture that looks just like an earth­quake,” he said. 

Infra­sound sen­sors mea­sure changes in the atmos­phere gen­er­at­ed by very-low-fre­quen­cy acoustic waves that can come from above-ground nuclear explosions. 

USAEDS still sup­ple­ments some of its 40 seis­mic sta­tions with infra­sound, the sci­en­tist said, and in the 1960s used infra­sound as the main way to detect nuclear explo­sions in the atmosphere. 

“But once we were able to get sen­sors on satel­lites,” he said, “that gave us a much bet­ter capability.” 

When the pro­gram first began, its only sen­sor, an air sam­pler, flew on a B‑29 air­craft over the Pacif­ic Ocean. In 1949, fly­ing between Alas­ka and Japan, the sam­pler detect­ed debris from the first Russ­ian atom­ic test. 

Today the sys­tem uses anoth­er air­craft, a WC-135 in a pro­gram called Con­stant Phoenix to col­lect air sam­ples from areas where nuclear explo­sions have occurred. 

If there is a nuclear explo­sion, O’Brien said, “we will [use mete­o­rol­o­gy] to project where radioac­tive debris would go. Then when it gets into inter­na­tion­al air­space, the air­craft can go to that spot.” 

The plane col­lects par­ti­cles so ana­lysts on the ground can test them to see if they con­tain radionu­clides, or radioac­tive elements. 

The plane also col­lects radioac­tive gas­es, espe­cial­ly radioac­tive xenon, which is a good indi­ca­tor that a nuclear explo­sion has occurred. 

With all these sen­sors, the U.S. Atom­ic Ener­gy Nuclear Detec­tion Sys­tem is the only net­work that oper­ates 24 hours a day, sev­en days a week, but it isn’t the only glob­al detec­tion system. 

In 1996, the Unit­ed Nations Gen­er­al Assem­bly adopt­ed the pro­vi­sions of the Com­pre­hen­sive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. One major pro­vi­sion pro­hib­it­ed nuclear explo­sions any­where, by anyone. 

Anoth­er pro­vi­sion described a 337-facil­i­ty Inter­na­tion­al Mon­i­tor­ing Sys­tem that would scan the earth for nuclear treaty vio­la­tions. The IMS facil­i­ties include seis­mic, hydroa­coustic, infra­sound and radionu­clide sta­tions, but no satel­lite sensors. 

Most of the world’s coun­tries have signed and rat­i­fied the treaty. Three coun­tries that have not signed the treaty have since test­ed nuclear devices — India and Pak­istan in 1998 and North Korea in 2006. 

The treaty has not yet entered into force — sev­er­al more coun­tries must rat­i­fy the treaty before that hap­pens. Until it does enter into force, some of the IMS mon­i­tor­ing sta­tions oper­ate 24 hours a day, but many do not. 

The Unit­ed States has signed, but not yet rat­i­fied, the treaty, and it has helped devel­op the Inter­na­tion­al Mon­i­tor­ing Sys­tem, O’Brien said. 

The IMS archi­tects “were start­ing from scratch in the mid-1990s, and we had many years of expe­ri­ence in these kinds of sys­tems,” he said. 

“So they came to us ask­ing for any advice that would help them avoid the pit­falls of putting a new sys­tem in,” the sci­en­tist added. 

The experts at USAEDS advised the mon­i­tor­ing sys­tem builders on world­wide logis­tics involved in estab­lish­ing such a sys­tem and onsite installations. 

USAEDS con­tributes the data from many of its seis­mic and hydroa­coustic sta­tions to the Inter­na­tion­al Mon­i­tor­ing System. 

“Out­side of the USAEDS,” O’Brien said, “the Unit­ed States through the Office of the Sec­re­tary of Defense con­tributes seis­mic, infra­sound and radionu­clide sta­tions to the IMS.” 

As a sig­na­to­ry to the Com­pre­hen­sive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the Unit­ed States is enti­tled to and receives all the data that the Inter­na­tion­al Mon­i­tor­ing Sys­tem produces. 

“We par­tic­i­pate in all their inter­na­tion­al meet­ings, and we have since [the system’s] incep­tion. They occa­sion­al­ly come here and vis­it,” O’Brien said. “I think both the IMS and our­selves are right at the state of the art of any tech­nol­o­gy that is prac­ti­cal for use in detect­ing nuclear explosions.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →