Schwartz: Smaller Air Force Will Concentrate on Key Capabilities

WASHINGTON, Feb. 29, 2012 — As the Air Force gets small­er in the years to come, it will have to empha­size the areas that will be the most rel­e­vant to defense, the Air Force chief of staff said here today.

Gen. Nor­ton A. Schwartz told the Defense Writ­ers Group that as bud­gets drop, the Air Force must con­cen­trate on four basic areas: con­trol of air and space, glob­al mobil­i­ty, glob­al sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance, and glob­al strike.

“Those areas clear­ly remain rel­e­vant to the strat­e­gy that focus­es on the Asia-Pacif­ic and the [Per­sian] Gulf region,” he said.

Because the ser­vice will be small­er, Air Force offi­cials must encour­age more ver­sa­til­i­ty in the force struc­ture that remains, entail­ing both surge require­ments and over­seas rota­tions. “That’s part of the ratio­nale for the adjust­ments in the force mix that we pro­posed in the [fis­cal 2013] bud­get,” the gen­er­al said.

Oper­a­tions and main­te­nance fund­ing will become a key aspect of this small­er force, Schwartz said, and will become more impor­tant to main­tain qual­i­ty. It’s not enough for offi­cials to say the Air Force is good, he added.

“We real­ly have to be good,” he said.

Schwartz, who tes­ti­fied yes­ter­day in a con­gres­sion­al bud­get hear­ing, reit­er­at­ed the service’s need for a new bomber.

“Do you think that the Chi­nese have estab­lished one of the world’s best air defense envi­ron­ments in their east­ern provinces just to invest their nation­al trea­sure?” he asked. “Or, for that mat­ter, that the Ira­ni­ans have estab­lished inte­grat­ed air defens­es around cer­tain loca­tions in their coun­try? I would say they are not doing this for the fun of it. They are doing it because they have a sense of vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty.

“What is it that con­veys that sense of vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty to oth­ers?” he con­tin­ued. “One of those is long-range strike, and that is an asset that the Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca should not con­cede. And that’s why the long-range bomber is rel­e­vant and will con­tin­ue to be rel­e­vant.”

The Air Force is cut­ting some air mobil­i­ty assets, but Schwartz said the ser­vice still can han­dle its mobil­i­ty require­ments. The Army and Marine Corps are cut­ting per­son­nel, he not­ed, and that will car­ry a cor­re­spond­ing decline in mobil­i­ty require­ments. The most recent study showed the Air Force has had to trans­port 32.7 mil­lion ton-miles per day, Schwartz said.

“The analy­sis that we have done indi­cates the require­ment giv­en the new strat­e­gy for­mu­la­tion and force size that flows from that is about 29.4 mil­lion ton-miles per day,” he added.

Even with the cuts, the gen­er­al said, the Air Force will have 275 large trans­port air­craft and 318 small-lift air­craft, rep­re­sent­ing about 30.5 mil­lion ton-miles of capa­bil­i­ty. “We are com­fort­able that we have a lev­el of capa­bil­i­ty that is suit­ed to the force struc­ture the new strat­e­gy envi­sions,” he said.

Schwartz said he wants the active Air Force, Air Nation­al Guard and Air Force Reserve mix to be bal­anced “for the long haul.” Ide­al­ly, he said, he wants a deploy­ment rota­tion of one year deployed to two years at home sta­tion for active duty air­men and a 1‑to‑4 or greater ratio for reserve-com­po­nent per­son­nel. “This is a ques­tion of try­ing to design the force for the long term in a way that active duty, Guard and Reserve can see them­selves in these jobs for the long term,” he said.

Though Air Force offi­cials have made their rec­om­men­da­tions, Schwartz said, Con­gress can block these changes — espe­cial­ly those per­tain­ing to Air Nation­al Guard units.

“If the Con­gress decides to not pro­ceed with some or all of our rec­om­men­da­tions, it is a zero-sum game,” he said. “The thing I lose sleep over is get­ting some of this back to us say­ing, ‘You can’t do this, you can’t do that, and I’m not going to give you the mon­ey, either.’ ”

That for­mu­la, he said, is the quick­est way to get to a hol­low force.

“As con­vinc­ing­ly as [Air Force Sec­re­tary] Mike Don­ley and I can, we will do our best to make the case that if it’s not what we’ve pro­posed, it needs to be some­thing that’s equiv­a­lent in terms of capa­bil­i­ty and cost,” he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →