Pentagon Official Makes Case for New BRAC Rounds

WASHINGTON, March 8, 2012 — The Defense Depart­ment needs two rounds of the Base Realign­ment and Clo­sure process this year and next to shed excess build­ing space and save mon­ey, the deputy under­sec­re­tary of defense for instal­la­tions and envi­ron­ment told a con­gres­sion­al pan­el today.

The two BRAC rounds would align with the department’s strate­gic guid­ance for a lean­er, more flex­i­ble force as it rebal­ances after the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Dorothy Robyn told the House Armed Ser­vices Committee’s readi­ness sub­com­mit­tee in pre­pared remarks.

“Of all the effi­cien­cy mea­sures that the depart­ment has under­tak­en over the years, BRAC is per­haps the most suc­cess­ful and sig­nif­i­cant,” she said.

The department’s fis­cal 2013 bud­get request calls for a 5.5 per­cent reduc­tion in mil­i­tary end strength in the next five years.

“Sim­ply stat­ed, the cuts in force struc­ture that we are imple­ment­ing must be accom­pa­nied by cuts in sup­port­ing infra­struc­ture, includ­ing mil­i­tary bases,” Robyn said. “Absent a process for clos­ing and realign­ing bases, the depart­ment will be locked in a sta­tus quo con­fig­u­ra­tion that does not match its evolv­ing force struc­ture, doc­trine and tech­nol­o­gy.”

Robyn said the expense of main­tain­ing bases that are excess to strate­gic and mis­sion require­ments would force the depart­ment to cut spend­ing on forces, train­ing and mod­ern­iza­tion.

The depart­ment needs to close instal­la­tions not only in the Unit­ed States, for which it needs con­gres­sion­al approval, but also over­seas, where it does­n’t, she said.

“The department’s request for addi­tion­al rounds of BRAC comes at a time when we are look­ing aggres­sive­ly at where we can close bases overseas—particularly in Europe,” Robyn said. The depart­ment already has made sig­nif­i­cant cuts in Europe, turn­ing over more than 100 sites to host nations since 2003, she said. By fis­cal 2015, the Army is expect­ed to close anoth­er 23 Euro­pean sites, she added.

Still, Robyn said, the depart­ment “can do more to con­sol­i­date our infra­struc­ture with the goal of reduc­ing long-term costs while still sup­port­ing our oper­a­tional require­ments and strate­gic com­mit­ments.”

To do that, Robyn said, the depart­ment can reduce the num­ber of “dis­crete” instal­la­tion sites in Europe from more than 300 to about 200 — those which cur­rent­ly house most activ­i­ties — and elim­i­nate excess sup­port infra­struc­ture such as ware­hous­es, admin­is­tra­tive space and hous­ing.

While acknowl­edg­ing that BRAC clo­sures are painful, Robyn said they “have left our mil­i­tary far bet­ter pre­pared to take on chang­ing strate­gic chal­lenges than it would have been had Con­gress and the depart­ment not had the courage to under­take them.”

While the depart­ment retains some author­i­ty to close and down­size instal­la­tions, Robyn said, BRAC is a bet­ter process, allow­ing for more com­mu­ni­ty sup­port.

The depart­ment spends about $40 bil­lion annu­al­ly on build­ing con­struc­tion, sus­tain­ment and recap­i­tal­iza­tion, Robyn said, and an addi­tion­al $15 bil­lion on sup­port pro­grams rang­ing from air traf­fic con­trol to pay­roll to reli­gious and recre­ation­al ser­vices. “Wecan­not afford to main­tain excess capac­i­ty,” she said.

In 2004, the depart­ment had 24 per­cent excess capac­i­ty rel­a­tive to its force struc­ture plans, Robyn said. The 2005 BRAC elim­i­nat­ed only about 3 per­cent of the department’s capac­i­ty, as it was designed most­ly to recon­fig­ure excess space, rather than close it, because the mil­i­tary was in a growth stage, she said.

While some have crit­i­cized the 2005 BRAC as unex­pect­ed­ly expen­sive at $35.1 bil­lion, the sav­ings also exceed­ed that of any oth­er BRAC round, at $4 bil­lion each year, she said.

Robyn asked that Con­gress move quick­ly to approve the BRAC rounds.

“While some may view our request for a round in 2013 as aggres­sive, the mag­ni­tude of the cuts we are mak­ing in force struc­ture means we sim­ply can’t wait,” she said. “Lead­ing U.S. cor­po­ra­tions retain their vital­i­ty and mar­ket posi­tion by being able to adapt quick­ly to changed cir­cum­stances, and the U.S. mil­i­tary is no dif­fer­ent.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →