Panetta Sees Long-term U.S. Relationship With Iraq

WASHINGTON, Aug. 17, 2011 — If the Iraqi gov­ern­ment requests U.S. assis­tance beyond the Dec. 31 dead­line for U.S. forces to be out of Iraq, the U.S. gov­ern­ment will dis­cuss with Iraqi lead­ers what kind of assis­tance is need­ed and how the Unit­ed States could pro­vide that help, Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta said here yes­ter­day.

“But the bot­tom line is, whether it’s diplo­mat­ic or whether it’s mil­i­tary, we’ve got a long-term rela­tion­ship with Iraq,” Panet­ta said dur­ing a pre­sen­ta­tion at the Nation­al Defense Uni­ver­si­ty. “We’ve invest­ed a lot of blood in that coun­try. And regard­less of whether you agree or dis­agree as to how we got into it, the bot­tom line is that we now have, through a lot of sac­ri­fice, estab­lished a … rel­a­tive­ly sta­ble democ­ra­cy that’s try­ing to work togeth­er to lead that coun­try.”

In his first brief­ing with Pen­ta­gon reporters, Pen­ta­gon Press Sec­re­tary George Lit­tle said today that the recent bomb­ings in Iraq — includ­ing some sui­cide bomb­ings — are deplorable, but the over­all tra­jec­to­ry in the coun­try is up.

Lit­tle said Panet­ta had a good dis­cus­sion today with Army Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, com­man­der of U.S. Forces Iraq, and that the men had dis­cussed the spate of attacks that killed at least 90 Iraqis and wound­ed hun­dreds.

“The sec­re­tary and Gen­er­al Austin are con­cerned about [the attacks],” Lit­tle said. “The oper­a­tions that the Iraqis and U.S. armed forces are con­duct­ing joint­ly to thwart mil­i­tants and ter­ror­ists in Iraq have yield­ed very good results.”

No group has claimed respon­si­bil­i­ty for the attacks, which struck Iraqi cities from Kirkuk to Bagh­dad to Bas­ra. The largest loss of life was in Kut. The attacks have the ear­marks of al-Qai­da in Iraq, offi­cials in Bagh­dad said.

“When it comes to the vio­lence, … the fact that there is some increased vio­lence recent­ly is … to be expect­ed,” Lit­tle said, not­ing that ter­ror groups and mil­i­tants will launch attacks to cre­ate the impres­sion they are dri­ving the Amer­i­cans from the coun­try, though the with­draw­al is a result of a U.S.-Iraq secu­ri­ty agree­ment signed in 2008.

These ter­ror­ists want to “claim cred­it or gain pres­tige” for a with­draw­al that has been planned and agreed to for three years, Lit­tle told reporters.

Mean­while, the Unit­ed States is com­mit­ted to with­draw­ing all troops from Iraq by Dec. 31, mark­ing the begin­ning of the next phase of U.S.-Iraqi rela­tions, Lit­tle said.

“We’re heav­i­ly engaged with the Iraqis in dis­cussing what the future part­ner­ship might be,” he added. “The key point when it comes to Iraq is the Unit­ed States has made the com­mit­ment that we will have a strate­gic rela­tion­ship with the coun­try beyond 2011. I don’t want to define pre­cise­ly what the make-up of that rela­tion­ship will be. That is an issue that is being worked.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →