Panetta: DOD Must Preserve Essential Capabilities

WASHINGTON, Oct. 11, 2011 — The Defense Depart­ment must pre­serve its essen­tial mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties as it tight­ens its belt over the next decade, Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta said here today.

Defense mod­ern­iza­tion and oper­at­ing funds offer the most options for the Pentagon’s strat­e­gy-based plan to achieve more than $450 bil­lion in spend­ing cuts over the next 10 years, but force size, mil­i­tary pay and ben­e­fits also must be addressed, Panet­ta told the audi­ence at the Woodrow Wil­son Inter­na­tion­al Cen­ter for Schol­ars’ Lee H. Hamil­ton lec­ture. The effort that then-Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates launched last year to elim­i­nate over­head infra­struc­ture, waste and dupli­ca­tion has result­ed in $150 bil­lion in sav­ings and may yield up to an addi­tion­al $60 bil­lion, but loom­ing bud­get reduc­tions require much more, Panet­ta said.

“Every pro­gram, every con­tract, every facil­i­ty will be scru­ti­nized for sav­ings that won’t reduce readi­ness or our abil­i­ty to per­form essen­tial mis­sions,” he said.

DOD must pre­serve essen­tial mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties, the sec­re­tary said, and main­tain a robust defense indus­tri­al base � the busi­ness­es that man­u­fac­ture or main­tain U.S. mil­i­tary weapons, equip­ment, muni­tions, hard­ware and soft­ware. How­ev­er, bud­get con­straints like­ly will mean reduced mod­ern­iza­tion in some areas, along with pro­cure­ment reform to con­trol cost, improve deliv­ery times and increase com­pe­ti­tion, he added.

Also, per­son­nel costs are “a major dri­ver of bud­get growth and … are on an unsus­tain­able course,” Panet­ta acknowl­edged. Mil­i­tary end strength has increased by 5 per­cent since 2001, but pay and health care costs are up about 80 per­cent over that time, he not­ed.

“This will be an area of extreme chal­lenge, because my high­est pri­or­i­ty is obvi­ous­ly to main­tain the vital­i­ty of our all-vol­un­teer force, and keep faith with the men and women who have put their lives on the line to defend the coun­try,” he said.

In a tight bud­get, the cost of pay and ben­e­fits to a degree rep­re­sents a trade-off against funds for nec­es­sary train­ing and equip­ment, the sec­re­tary said. Still, he vowed that any changes to com­pen­sa­tion will be “grand­fa­thered” where pos­si­ble so as not to affect peo­ple cur­rent­ly serv­ing.

Ground forces will be small­er after U.S. forces leave Iraq and Afghanistan, Panet­ta said, but the nation still faces a wide array of threats, “from ter­ror­ism to nuclear pro­lif­er­a­tion; from rogue states to cyber attacks; from rev­o­lu­tions in the Mid­dle East to eco­nom­ic cri­sis in Europe to the rise of new pow­ers like Chi­na and India.”

All of those ele­ments rep­re­sent secu­ri­ty — geopo­lit­i­cal, eco­nom­ic and demo­graph­ic shifts that make the world “more unpre­dictable, more volatile and, yes, more dan­ger­ous,” the sec­re­tary said.

“I must be able to main­tain a suf­fi­cient force to … fight in more than one area,” he told the audi­ence.

Nation­al Guard and Reserve forces have proven them­selves in the past decade’s com­bat the­aters, and can respond when future crises occur, the sec­re­tary said. But the nation must have a mil­i­tary trained and equipped to respond to an uncer­tain and sur­pris­ing secu­ri­ty envi­ron­ment.

“Look­ing at all these areas, the poten­tial exists, if we make the right strat­e­gy-based deci­sions, to build a mod­ern force that sus­tains our lead­er­ship in the world, and under­writes our secu­ri­ty and pros­per­i­ty,” he said. “But to accom­plish this will require that we nav­i­gate through some very per­ilous polit­i­cal waters � there are seri­ous dan­gers ahead and very lit­tle mar­gin for error.”

Panet­ta said the sequester mech­a­nism built into the Bud­get Con­trol Act of 2011 could trig­ger “dis­as­trous” cuts — not only for DOD, but also for the State Depart­ment, the U.S. Agency for Inter­na­tion­al Devel­op­ment and oth­er agen­cies crit­i­cal to the nation’s secu­ri­ty inter­ests.

Nation­al secu­ri­ty depends on defense, diplo­ma­cy and the abil­i­ty to help oth­er coun­tries while invest­ing in domes­tic qual­i­ty-of-life issues such as edu­ca­tion and employ­ment, the sec­re­tary said.

“We must remem­ber that the Amer­i­can peo­ple and our part­ners across the globe are safer, more sta­ble, and more pros­per­ous because of our glob­al lead­er­ship, and the strength of our mil­i­tary,” he added.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →