Officials Explain New Sexual Assault Policies

WASHINGTON, April 23, 2012 — Senior Defense Depart­ment offi­cials today said they hope more ser­vice mem­bers who are vic­tims of sex­u­al assault report the crimes as a result of a pol­i­cy change Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta announced last week.

Panet­ta issued guid­ance April 20 with­hold­ing “ini­tial dis­po­si­tion author­i­ty” from any offi­cer who is below the O‑6 — colonel or Navy cap­tain — lev­el and who does not hold spe­cial court-mar­tial con­ven­ing author­i­ty. In oth­er words, unit com­man­ders at the com­pa­ny or squadron lev­el no longer have author­i­ty to decide whether to take fur­ther action in report­ed cas­es of attempt­ed rape, forcible sodomy or sex­u­al assault.

In announc­ing the new pol­i­cy, the sec­re­tary said the change will ensure that sex­u­al assault cas­es receive high-lev­el atten­tion.

A senior defense offi­cial told reporters today dur­ing a back­ground brief­ing that the new pol­i­cy will allow more expe­ri­enced and less par­tial offi­cers to make the ini­tial deci­sion on whether a sex­u­al assault case goes to tri­al. That will add con­sis­ten­cy to how such cas­es are han­dled, the offi­cial added.

“The fur­ther ’north’ you go [in rank] the more atten­tion there is paid to this,” the offi­cial said. “They get a lev­el of train­ing that some­body at the O‑3 lev­el would­n’t nec­es­sar­i­ly get.”

The defense offi­cial cit­ed a hypo­thet­i­cal case in which an alleged attack­er and vic­tim belong to the same com­pa­ny-lev­el unit of about 115 enlist­ed peo­ple and five offi­cers work­ing for the same Army cap­tain or Navy lieu­tenant com­man­der.

In the past, the offi­cial said, a vic­tim in that unit might choose not to report an assault because the com­man­der liked the alleged attack­er more, or because the victim’s per­for­mance in the unit might cause the com­man­der to dis­be­lieve the victim’s report. Now, that unit com­man­der must for­ward such reports up the chain of com­mand to a colonel-lev­el spe­cial court-mar­tial con­ven­ing author­i­ty.

A Joint Staff offi­cial told reporters, also on back­ground, that the new pol­i­cy is intend­ed in part to remove deci­sions from the “imme­di­ate lev­el of the crime.”

More senior offi­cers will have “a more neu­tral abil­i­ty to take a look at the facts … and make a rea­soned deci­sion,” the Joint Staff offi­cial said.

The change also means that offi­cers mak­ing future dis­po­si­tion deci­sions typ­i­cal­ly will have legal and med­ical staff mem­bers who can assist in deter­min­ing prop­er han­dling of the case, the defense offi­cial said. The new pol­i­cy also applies to any asso­ci­at­ed charges relat­ed to an alleged assault, the offi­cial added.

“Any sug­ges­tion or appear­ance of retal­i­a­tion would have to be resolved at the same [high­er] lev­el,” the offi­cial said.

The offi­cial not­ed there are sev­er­al prece­dents for the with­hold­ing pol­i­cy. A sim­i­lar approach — plac­ing author­i­ty for case dis­po­si­tion under the Uni­form Code of Mil­i­tary Jus­tice with more senior offi­cers — typ­i­cal­ly applies in cas­es of offi­cer mis­con­duct, cas­es with nation­al secu­ri­ty inter­est or in alleged mis­con­duct by civil­ians accom­pa­ny­ing the force, the offi­cial said.

The offi­cial said Panet­ta has direct­ed that oth­er new poli­cies also take effect:

— Estab­lish­ing “Spe­cial Victim’s Unit” capa­bil­i­ties with­in each of the ser­vices, to ensure that spe­cial­ly trained inves­ti­ga­tors, pros­e­cu­tors and vic­tim-wit­ness assis­tance per­son­nel are avail­able to assist with sex­u­al assault cas­es;

— Requir­ing that sex­u­al assault poli­cies be explained to all ser­vice mem­bers with­in 14 days of their entrance on active duty;

— Allow­ing reserve and Nation­al Guard mem­bers who have been sex­u­al­ly assault­ed while on active duty to remain in their active-duty sta­tus to obtain the treat­ment and sup­port afford­ed to active-duty mem­bers;

— Requir­ing a record of the out­come of dis­ci­pli­nary and admin­is­tra­tive pro­ceed­ings relat­ed to sex­u­al assault, and requir­ing that copies of those records be cen­tral­ly retained;

— Requir­ing annu­al orga­ni­za­tion­al cli­mate assess­ments; and

— Man­dat­ing wider pub­lic dis­sem­i­na­tion of DOD resources, includ­ing the DOD Safe Helpline, a free, anony­mous and con­fi­den­tial resource that can be reached world­wide, 24 hours a day, to con­nect vic­tims with live sex­u­al assault sup­port pro­fes­sion­als.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →