Official: NATO Investment Critical Despite Fiscal Challenge

WASHINGTON, Feb. 28, 2012 — Fis­cal aus­ter­i­ty adds to the chal­lenge of build­ing NATO capac­i­ty, but iden­ti­fy­ing pri­or­i­ties and insti­tut­ing new ini­tia­tives will help the alliance meet evolv­ing secu­ri­ty threats, the act­ing under­sec­re­tary of defense for pol­i­cy said here today.

At a sem­i­nar held to pre­pare for the NATO sum­mit in Chica­go in May, James N. Miller shared the stage with NATO Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al Anders Fogh Ras­mussen and Gen. Stephane Abr­i­al of the French air force, NATO’s supreme allied com­man­der for trans­for­ma­tion.

“What we seek is an alliance that can ful­fill its strate­gic con­cept with forces that are small­er and lean­er, while still agile, flex­i­ble, ready, tech­no­log­i­cal­ly advanced and high­ly inter­op­er­a­ble,” Miller said.

At the Novem­ber 2010 NATO sum­mit in Lis­bon, Por­tu­gal, the alliance agreed to a strate­gic con­cept that account­ed for a chang­ing secu­ri­ty envi­ron­ment and com­mit­ted to enhanc­ing 10 crit­i­cal NATO capa­bil­i­ties. These includ­ed cyber defense, com­mand and con­trol, strate­gic lift, and Allied Ground Sur­veil­lance, or AGS, a sys­tem of unmanned aer­i­al vehi­cles that will give NATO an impor­tant intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance capa­bil­i­ty.

“We must have cut­ting-edge capa­bil­i­ties that exploit the allies’ tech­no­log­i­cal, joint and net­worked advan­tages,” Miller said. “These forces must be led by well-trained offi­cers, [non­com­mis­sioned offi­cers] and enlist­ed per­son­nel of the high­est qual­i­ty, and should reflect lessons learned from recent NATO oper­a­tions, includ­ing in Afghanistan and Libya.”

The force also should reflect an aware­ness that tomorrow’s needs may dif­fer sig­nif­i­cant­ly from those of today, he added.

Deci­sions have been made in allied cap­i­tals over the past two years to rad­i­cal­ly cut defense spend­ing and reduce force size and struc­ture, Miller said. Allies gen­er­al­ly have com­mu­ni­cat­ed changes in defense plans to NATO, but the infor­ma­tion “often fails to pro­vide a suit­able base for plan­ning,” he added.

“Once nation­al force struc­tures are known with greater reli­a­bil­i­ty and pre­ci­sion, we can work to defend our most vital capa­bil­i­ties,” the under­sec­re­tary said.

“Smart defense” — a con­cept that encour­ages allies to coop­er­ate to devel­op, acquire and main­tain mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties in accor­dance with the strate­gic con­cept — plays a fun­da­men­tal role, Miller said.

As part of its prepa­ra­tions for the sum­mit in Chica­go, the under­sec­re­tary rec­om­mend­ed that NATO take sev­er­al steps.

Allied Com­mand Trans­for­ma­tion offi­cials have iden­ti­fied 20 to 30 “Tier 1” multi­na­tion­al projects as can­di­dates for greater resource pool­ing, he said. The project list should be expand­ed and ranked by pri­or­i­ty, he added, based on how they con­tribute to the alliance’s min­i­mum-capa­bil­i­ty require­ments.

Along with these projects, between now and the sum­mit in Chica­go, NATO should pre­pare a short list of high-vis­i­bil­i­ty multi­na­tion­al pro­grams that could be devel­oped under the smart defense frame­work.

“These should be real­is­tic and afford­able, but under­score the alliance’s renewed com­mit­ment to deliv­er required capa­bil­i­ties over the next 10 years, even in times of pro­found aus­ter­i­ty,” Miller said.

An exam­ple of such a pro­gram is the NATO joint intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance hub, he said, adding that expand­ing joint ISR is an alliance pri­or­i­ty and one of the 10 crit­i­cal capa­bil­i­ties. NATO could take advan­tage of its recent adop­tion of AGS to devel­op a capa­bil­i­ty for joint ISR that acts as a plat­form to inte­grate and exer­cise nation­al capa­bil­i­ties, Miller said.

Anoth­er smart defense capa­bil­i­ty that could be advanced in Chica­go is bal­lis­tic mis­sile defense radar data shar­ing and inter­cep­tor pool­ing, he added.

NATO should explore con­cepts for inter­na­tion­al coop­er­a­tion on sea-based BMD sen­sor and shoot­er capa­bil­i­ties, pos­si­bly form­ing the basis for a sea-based mis­sile-defense users group,” Miller said.

“Sev­er­al allies have naval capa­bil­i­ties that could be upgrad­ed and includ­ed in NATO mis­sile defense,” he added. “We should aspire to announce in Chica­go that a group of allies will be work­ing togeth­er to explore one or more shared BMD ini­tia­tives.”

Miller said sev­er­al oth­er ini­tia­tives could help the alliance work toward core secu­ri­ty objec­tives, includ­ing:

— Insti­tut­ing new orga­ni­za­tion­al, oper­a­tional and fund­ing prin­ci­ples that help rein­vig­o­rate the NATO Response Force, a high­ly ready and tech­no­log­i­cal­ly advanced multi­na­tion­al force made up of land, air, mar­itime and spe­cial-forces com­po­nents;

— Increas­ing multi­na­tion­al train­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties using bat­tal­ion task-force rota­tions; and

— Expand­ing NATO’s spe­cial oper­a­tions capa­bil­i­ties through head­quar­ters liaisons, con­sol­i­dat­ed train­ing and cen­tral­ized lift capa­bil­i­ties.

“We know that com­mit­ting to new ini­tia­tives in the cur­rent fis­cal envi­ron­ment is dif­fi­cult,” Miller said. “But we also know that the deci­sions we make right now will enhance our abil­i­ty to meet secu­ri­ty chal­lenges five to 10 years from now, and that the cost of these ini­tia­tives, such as AGS, can be spread out over many years to make them more afford­able.”

NATO mis­sile defense, the under­sec­re­tary said, anoth­er of the 10 capa­bil­i­ties com­mit­ted to at Lis­bon, will be fea­tured at the Chica­go sum­mit.

“Despite rumors of U.S. cuts in this area,” Miller said, “we’re on track in deploy­ing the Euro­pean phased adap­tive approach. In fact, we expect to declare at the Chica­go sum­mit that NATO has an inter­im bal­lis­tic mis­sile-defense capa­bil­i­ty.”

By announc­ing an inter­im mis­sile-defense capa­bil­i­ty, the under­sec­re­tary added, “we can send a very pow­er­ful mes­sage at Chica­go -– [that] NATO is seri­ous about coun­ter­ing the grow­ing threats from the pro­lif­er­a­tion of weapons of mass destruc­tion and their deliv­ery sys­tems.”

Miller also urged all NATO mem­bers to recom­mit to main­tain­ing a 2 per­cent share of bud­get for defense fund­ing, call­ing that “a respon­si­ble, sus­tain­able invest­ment in our alliance and in our shared secu­ri­ty.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →