Official: Budget Request Keeps Navy, Marines ‘Expeditionary’

WASHINGTON, Feb. 13, 2012 — The Navy and Marine Corps will be lean­er and small­er, but still rapid­ly deploy­able under the fis­cal 2013 bud­get request Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma sent to Con­gress today, the Navy’s bud­get chief said.

Rear Adm. Joseph P. Mul­loy, the Navy’s deputy assis­tant sec­re­tary for bud­get, told Pen­ta­gon reporters today the sea ser­vice, which also admin­is­ters the Marine Corps’ bud­get, will trim spend­ing by $58.1 bil­lion by the end of fis­cal 2017. The Navy’s pro­posed fis­cal 2013 bud­get is down $9.5 bil­lion from fis­cal 2012. 

“We think all of our invest­ments here are aligned to the strate­gic pri­or­i­ties and goals as set out by the pres­i­dent,” the admi­ral said. 

As required by the Bud­get Con­trol Act, the Defense Depart­ment bud­get request includes $487 bil­lion in spend­ing cuts for fis­cal years 2013 to 2017. 

The bud­get request sets Navy active and reserve end strength for fis­cal 2013 at 385,200 — 1.7 per­cent less than fis­cal 2012. In fis­cal 2017, the end strength will be 376,600, a 3.9 per­cent reduc­tion from fis­cal 2012. 

Marine Corps active and reserve end strength in fis­cal 2013 is 236,900 under the pro­pos­al — 2 per­cent less than fis­cal 2012. In fis­cal 2017 the end strength will be 221,700, an 8.3 per­cent reduc­tion from fis­cal 2012. 

“The Navy has come down almost 6,000 peo­ple over the last 10 years,” the admi­ral not­ed. Marine Corps end-state reduc­tions, like the Army’s, are in line with planned troop reduc­tions in Afghanistan, he added. 

Mul­loy not­ed sailors and Marines will lose “not a dol­lar” under the bud­get request, though pay increas­es will slow after 2014. 

In force struc­ture changes through fis­cal 2017, the Navy will elim­i­nate sev­en cruis­ers and two dock land­ing ships. Next fis­cal year, the ser­vice is slat­ed to add sev­en and drop 11 from its list of com­bat-capa­ble ships. 

The Navy will gain a nuclear attack sub­ma­rine, a trans­port dock, a dry-car­go ammu­ni­tion ship, a lit­toral com­bat ship, two joint high-speed ves­sels and one mobile land­ing plat­form. The ser­vice will retire one air­craft car­ri­er, six frigates and four cruisers. 

Mul­loy not­ed Navy offi­cials don’t expect the fleet size to change much over time, though the num­ber of ships will drop slight­ly for a few years. 

“We’re fore­cast­ing that in 2017 we’ll have the same num­ber of ships that we have now,” he said. 

“We have 37 ships under con­struc­tion … and nine more ships to award this year,” the admi­ral added. 

The Marine Corps will elim­i­nate an infantry reg­i­ment head­quar­ters, five infantry bat­tal­ions — four active and one reserve), an artillery bat­tal­ion, four tac­ti­cal air squadrons — three active and one reserve), and a com­bat logis­tics battalion. 

Mul­loy acknowl­edged the bud­get request call for delay­ing sev­er­al Navy and Marine Corps pro­grams and post­pon­ing some pur­chas­es. Oper­a­tions and main­te­nance are essen­tial, he said, and too-deep force cuts car­ry unac­cept­able risk, so “where do you take the cuts?” 

Navy plan­ners and lead­ers looked at long-term pro­grams as the best source of cost reduc­tion, he said, adding “The real dri­ver here was, ‘What do we need to have?’ ” 

The pro­pos­al delays for two years the planned “SSBN‑X” bal­lis­tic mis­sile sub­ma­rine pro­gram, which will devel­op a replace­ment for the Ohio-class submarines. 

The Ohio-class subs will begin to reach the end of their ser­vice life in 2027, accord­ing to Navy offi­cials. A two-year delay in devel­op­ing the multi­bil­lion-dol­lar replace­ment, which will form part of the nation’s nuclear tri­ad, rep­re­sents an “accept­able risk,” offi­cials said. 

The Navy also pro­pos­es reduc­ing pro­cure­ment of joint high-speed ves­sels from 18 ships to 10, and a sched­uled MV-22 Osprey pur­chase by 24 air­craft through 2017. 

The Navy will also slow buys of two joint strike fight­er vari­ants, defer­ring until after 2017 pur­chase of 69 of the air­craft. The ser­vice will ter­mi­nate its Medi­um-Range Mar­itime Unmanned Aer­i­al Sys­tem, as Navy offi­cials said oth­er unmanned sys­tems show demon­strat­ed capability. 

Spend­ing for Navy and Marine Corps green ener­gy ini­tia­tives will remain fair­ly steady, Mul­loy said, call­ing them a key com­po­nent for the depart­ment for “tremen­dous tac­ti­cal reasons.” 

For Marines on the ground and ships and planes afloat, min­i­miz­ing fuel trans­port and fuel­ing oper­a­tions means reduc­ing risk, he noted. 

“Every­thing you can do to [reduce] ener­gy use and dri­ve the same tac­ti­cal out­put … is impor­tant,” the admi­ral said. 

The Navy and Marine Corps’ empha­sis on renew­able ener­gy ensures more “safe­ty for per­son­nel and effi­cien­cy for our forces,” Mul­loy added. 

The bud­get pro­pos­al will mean “a lean­er, small­er force, but we’re still rapid­ly deploy­able and expe­di­tionary, and we’re manned and led with the high­est qual­i­ty of indi­vid­u­als,” he said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →