New Afghan Network Supports Coalition Sharing

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, Md., March 9, 2011 — A new net­work that pro­motes infor­ma­tion and intel­li­gence shar­ing among coali­tion part­ners in Afghanistan is improv­ing sit­u­a­tion­al aware­ness and lay­ing a foun­da­tion for future coali­tion oper­a­tions, an offi­cial involved in stand­ing up the net­work said.
The Afghan Mis­sion Net­work, slat­ed to reach full oper­a­tional capa­bil­i­ty this sum­mer, gives the Unit­ed States and 45 part­ners in the NATO-led Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force the oppor­tu­ni­ty to link up over a com­mon mis­sion net­work, Richard Wittstruck, chief engi­neer for the Army’s Pro­gram Exec­u­tive Office – Intel­li­gence, Elec­tron­ic War­fare and Sen­sors, told Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice.

That’s a first for the alliance, he explained, enabling mem­bers to share mis­sion-relat­ed data that pre­vi­ous­ly had been restrict­ed to their indi­vid­ual secure net­works.

Army Gen. Stan­ley A. McChrys­tal, for­mer com­man­der of U.S. and ISAF forces in Afghanistan, and U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand head­quar­ters pressed for the com­mon net­work to bet­ter man­age com­mand and con­trol and share intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance infor­ma­tion, Wittstruck said.

When it reached ini­tial oper­at­ing capa­bil­i­ty last sum­mer, the net­work was typ­i­cal­ly used to enable coali­tion part­ners to share cal­en­dars, meet­ing announce­ments and oth­er admin­is­tra­tive details and to inter­face through chat rooms and “white­board­ing” ses­sions.

But as the Unit­ed States began post­ing oper­a­tional infor­ma­tion, includ­ing data from its intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance sources, Wittstruck said, coali­tion part­ners began fol­low­ing its lead.

“Peo­ple began shar­ing things they had nev­er shared before,” he said. “Now, every­one sits back and says ‘Wow, look at what we did­n’t know about the com­plete pic­ture. Now look at how much bet­ter we all are in doing this.”

This new col­lab­o­ra­tion gave bat­tle­field com­man­ders an unprece­dent­ed lev­el of sit­u­a­tion­al aware­ness. “If I’m a com­man­der on the ground, I want to know every­thing that is going on in my area of respon­si­bil­i­ty,” Wittstruck said. “I would like access to what every­body has col­lect­ed in that area of respon­si­bil­i­ty and get a com­plete pic­ture of the threat.”

But get­ting the U.S. frame­work in place to sup­port the net­work took a her­culean effort by Wittstruck’s orga­ni­za­tion as well as Pro­gram Exec­u­tive Office Com­mand, Con­trol and Com­mu­ni­ca­tions – Tac­ti­cal.

Imme­di­ate­ly after receiv­ing the require­ment, engi­neers deployed to Afghanistan and Qatar to work through the tech­ni­cal chal­lenges of stand­ing up the U.S. com­po­nent of the Afghan Mis­sion Net­work, called the Com­bined Enter­prise Region­al Infor­ma­tion Exchange Sys­tem ISAF, or CX‑I.

Unlike the Secret Inter­net Pro­to­col Router net­work, or SIPERNET, that by law is restrict­ed to U.S. users, the CX‑I pro­vid­ed a forum for shar­ing mis­sion-crit­i­cal infor­ma­tion.

Anx­ious to get the new sys­tem going, McChrys­tal ordered the migra­tion of mis­sion-crit­i­cal data to the new CX‑I sys­tem in Jan­u­ary 2010, also des­ig­nat­ing that the first Army unit, the Army’s 2nd Stryk­er Cav­al­ry Reg­i­ment, be field­ed with the new net­work equip­ment that spring.

With­in four weeks, the team had engi­neered, pro­cured, field­ed, con­fig­ured and installed all the nec­es­sary equip­ment. Much of it was con­fig­ured using com­mer­cial, off-the-shelf com­po­nents already in the inven­to­ry, sav­ing $10 mil­lion at the first unit alone.

The team’s rapid response in fill­ing the gap in elec­tron­ic data-shar­ing earned them the pres­ti­gious 2010 David Packard Excel­lence in Acqui­si­tion Award.

Grat­i­fy­ing as the award may be, Wittstruck said, the big­ger reward is rec­og­niz­ing the new capa­bil­i­ties the net­work brings warfight­ers on the ground. As it sup­ports them, the Afghan Mis­sion Net­work will have an impact on future coali­tion mis­sions that lasts long past the mis­sion in Afghanistan, he said.

“We think it is going to be the point of depar­ture for future oper­a­tions,” Wittstruck said. “You will be able to scratch out ‘Afghan’ and just say ‘X’ Mis­sion Net­work. And wher­ev­er we go next in a coali­tion cam­paign, some­thing like that will prob­a­bly stand up.

“It’s a fun­da­men­tal change in the way we con­duct oper­a­tions, and we’re very proud of that,” he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →