NBC’s “Meet the Press” interview with Secretary Gates and Secretary Clinton on Libya

MR. GREGORY: As part of the president’s effort to more ful­ly explain the U.S. mis­sion and inter­ests in Libya, the Sec­re­tary of State, Hillary Clin­ton , and Sec­re­tary of Defense Robert Gates sat down here with me yes­ter­day.
Sec­re­tary Clin­ton, Sec­re­tary Gates, wel­come back to MEET THE PRESS. The pres­i­dent said this is an oper­a­tion that would take days, not weeks. We are now into the sec­ond week. Has the mis­sion been accom­plished?

SEC. GATES: I think that the no-fly zone aspect of the mis­sion has been accom­plished. We have not seen any of his planes fly since the mis­sion start­ed. We have sup­pressed his air defens­es. I think we’ve also been suc­cess­ful on the human­i­tar­i­an side. We have pre­vent­ed his forces from going to Beng­hazi, and we have tak­en out a good bit of his armor. So I think we have, to a very large extent, com­plet­ed the mil­i­tary mis­sion in terms of get­ting it set up. Now, the no-fly zone and even the human­i­tar­i­an side will have to be sus­tained for some peri­od of time. 

MR. GREGORY: Is Gad­hafi capa­ble of rout­ing the rebels? 

SEC. CLINTON: At this point it appears that his efforts have been stopped. I think if you were to look at where we were just a cou­ple of weeks ago, he was clear­ly on his way to Beng­hazi. He was intend­ing, by his own words, to show no mer­cy, to go house to house. I think we’ve pre­vent­ed a great human­i­tar­i­an dis­as­ter, which is always hard to point to some­thing that did­n’t hap­pen, but I, I believe we did. And now we’re begin­ning to see, because of the good work of the, the coali­tion , to see his, his troops begin to turn back towards the west and to see the oppo­si­tion begin to reclaim ground they had lost. 

MR. GREGORY: That said, Sec­re­tary Gates, would the U.S. sup­ply arms to the rebels? 

SEC. GATES: No deci­sion has been made about that at this point. The, the Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil res­o­lu­tion would per­mit it, the 2nd Res­o­lu­tion 1973 would per­mit it. But no deci­sions have been made by our gov­ern­ment about that. 

MR. GREGORY: Why? Does this admin­is­tra­tion want to see the rebels pre­vail and over­take Gadhafi? 

SEC. GATES: I think the president’s pol­i­cy is that it’s time for Gad­hafi to go. That’s not part of our mil­i­tary mis­sion, which has been very lim­it­ed and very strict­ly defined. 

MR. GREGORY: Well, so how is that going to happen? 


MR. GREGORY: Sec­re­tary Clin­ton, you said this week that you thought you were pick­ing up sig­nals that he want­ed to get out of his own accord. 

SEC. CLINTON: Well, David, there are many dif­fer­ent aspects to the strat­e­gy that the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty is pur­su­ing. As Bob has said, the mil­i­tary mis­sion has gone very well. It only start­ed, you know, just like eight days ago. So it has been remark­ably well-coor­di­nat­ed and focused, and now NATO will take com­mand and con­trol over it. At the same time, we are pur­su­ing real­ly strict eco­nom­ic sanc­tions on him and peo­ple close to him. We have a polit­i­cal effort under way. The African Union just called for a tran­si­tion to democ­ra­cy. The Arab League, the oth­ers of us who are sup­port­ing this endeav­or are going to be meet­ing in Lon­don on Tues­day to begin to focus on how we’re going to help facil­i­tate such a tran­si­tion of him leav­ing power. 

MR. GREGORY: Right. But, but you said this week you thought there were indi­ca­tions he was look­ing to get out. Is that true? 

SEC. CLINTON: Well, peo­ple around him — we have a lot of evi­dence that peo­ple around him are reach­ing out. Now, so far what they’ve been doing is to say, “You’re mis­un­der­stand­ing us. You don’t appre­ci­ate what we’re doing. Come and talk to us.” Well, the sec­re­tary gen­er­al of the Unit­ed Nations has appoint­ed a for­mer Jor­dan­ian for­eign min­is­ter as a spe­cial envoy. He will be going to both Beng­hazi and Tripoli in, in the next few days so that we will pro­vide a very clear mes­sage to Gad­hafi. But we’re also send­ing a mes­sage to peo­ple around him, “Do you real­ly want to be a pari­ah? Do you real­ly want to end up in the inter­na­tion­al crim­i­nal court? Now is your time to get out of this and to help change the direction.” 

MR. GREGORY: Bot­tom line, the pres­i­dent wants him to go. But the pres­i­dent will not take him out himself. 

SEC. GATES: Cer­tain­ly not militarily. 

MR. GREGORY: So it would have to be oth­er means. 



SEC. GATES: But — and as I, as I’ve said, you know, we have, we have things in our tool box in addi­tion to ham­mers. Sec­re­tary Clin­ton ’s just talked about a num­ber of them. And don’t under­es­ti­mate what Hillary just said, of the peo­ple around him look­ing at what’s hap­pen­ing and the inter­na­tion­al view of this place, and when’s the time to turn and go to the oth­er side? And so the… 

MR. GREGORY: Let me… 

SEC. GATES: I think we — one should not under­es­ti­mate the pos­si­bil­i­ty of the regime itself cracking. 

MR. GREGORY: I want to talk about some of the con­gres­sion­al crit­i­cism. Speak­er of the House Boehn­er issued a let­ter with ques­tions, some of which were deemed legit­i­mate ques­tions by the White House. Here’s a por­tion of it, I’ll put it up on the screen: “Because of the con­flict­ing mes­sages from the admin­is­tra­tion and our coali­tion part­ners,” he wrote, “there is a lack of clar­i­ty over the objec­tives of this mis­sion , what our nation­al secu­ri­ty inter­ests are, how it fits into our over­ar­ch­ing pol­i­cy for the Mid­dle East . The Amer­i­can peo­ple deserve answers to these ques­tions. And all of these con­cerns point to a fun­da­men­tal ques­tion: What is your bench­mark for suc­cess in Libya?” 

SEC. CLINTON: Well, I think it’s per­fect­ly legit­i­mate for mem­bers of Con­gress and the pub­lic to ask ques­tions. The president’s going to address the nation Mon­day night. A lot of these ques­tions will be answered. But, but I would just make a cou­ple of points. First, on March 1 the Unit­ed States Sen­ate passed a res­o­lu­tion call­ing for a no-fly zone. That was a bipar­ti­san res­o­lu­tion. There were a num­ber of peo­ple in the House, includ­ing lead­er­ship in both the Repub­li­can and Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ties, who were demand­ing that action be tak­en. The inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty came togeth­er; and, in an unprece­dent­ed action, the Arab League called on the Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil to do exact­ly what the Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil end­ed up doing. Now, the Unit­ed States and oth­er coun­tries were in a posi­tion to be able to act to enforce it. If you look at the cov­er­age on Al Jazeera, if you lis­ten to the state­ments that are being put out by the oppo­si­tion in Libya , there is a great deal of appre­ci­a­tion for what we and oth­ers have done in order to stop Gad­hafi on his mis­sion of mer­ci­less oppres­sion. So this was an inter­na­tion­al effort that the Unit­ed States was a part of. I cer­tain­ly believe it was with­in the president’s con­sti­tu­tion­al author­i­ty to do so. It is going accord­ing to the plan that the pres­i­dent laid out. The Unit­ed States will be tran­si­tion­ing to a NATO com­mand and con­trol. And then we will be join­ing with the rest of the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty. And if you look at the region, can you imag­ine, David, if we were sit­ting here and Gad­hafi had got­ten to Beng­hazi and, in a city of 700,000 peo­ple, had mas­sa­cred tens of thou­sands, hun­dreds of thou­sands had fled over the bor­der, desta­bi­liz­ing Egypt? Every­body would be say­ing why did­n’t the pres­i­dent do something? 

MR. GREGORY: Can I ask you about Boehn­er himself? 

SEC. CLINTON: These are, these are dif­fi­cult choices. 

MR. GREGORY: Did Speak­er Boehn­er raise any objec­tions when he was briefed pri­or to the mission? 

SEC. CLINTON: Well, I know that there was a con­stant flow of infor­ma­tion, both to mem­bers and staff. And, of course, the pres­i­dent had a, a con­fer­ence with some mem­bers in per­son, oth­ers, many oth­ers, includ­ing the speak­er on the phone. But we have no objec­tion to any­body ask­ing ques­tions. But I think it’s impor­tant to look at the con­text in which this is occur­ring. And the fact that we have moved so rapid­ly to have this kind of inter­na­tion­al action tak­en answers in great mea­sure the legit­i­mate con­cerns of the peo­ple of Libya. And now, of course, we’re going to take it day by day. That’s what you do in a sit­u­a­tion like this. 

MR. GREGORY: The military’s stretched pret­ty thin. Look at this map to show what our com­mit­ments are around the globe. In Iraq, of course, we have 47,000 troops. In Afghanistan, 100,000 strong, and now this addi­tion­al com­mit­ment of U.S. troops, I mean, not troops, but U.S. assets in Libya. How does the pres­i­dent, speak­ing to the nation Mon­day night, main­tain a sense of nation­al pur­pose here at a time when we’re so stretched? 

SEC. GATES: Actu­al­ly, your list was incom­plete. We have a sub­stan­tial mil­i­tary com­mit­ment in a human­i­tar­i­an assis­tance dis­as­ter relief in Japan, as well, large­ly using naval forces. The air forces that we are using for the most part and the air forces in par­tic­u­lar that we are using Libya are forces nor­mal­ly sta­tioned in Europe in any event. The real­i­ty is, though, begin­ning this week or with­in the next week or so, we will begin to dimin­ish the com­mit­ment of resources that we have com­mit­ted to this. We knew the president’s plan at the begin­ning was we would go in heavy at first because we had the capac­i­ty to do it, in terms of sup­press­ing air defens­es and so on. But then the idea was that, over time, the coali­tion would assume a larg­er and larg­er pro­por­tion of the bur­den. This was the con­ver­sa­tion he had with for­eign lead­ers when this whole thing was com­ing togeth­er. And so we see our com­mit­ment of resources actu­al­ly begin­ning to decline. 

MR. GREGORY: How long does the no-fly zone last? 

SEC. GATES: Well, the… 

MR. GREGORY: Weeks or longer? 

SEC. GATES: Once the, once the Arab — first of all, nobody knows the answer to that question. 

SEC. CLINTON: Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. 

SEC. GATES: But once the air defens­es have been sup­pressed, what it takes to sus­tain the no- fly zone is sub­stan­tial­ly less than what it takes to estab­lish it. 

MR. GREGORY: Let me ask this ques­tion, though, still on the mil­i­tary, and then I want your com­ment as well. What if things don’t go as planned? What is our con­tin­gency plan­ning? What is the U.S. com­mit­ment if things get worse in Libya? If Gad­hafi stays? If there’s an entrenched civ­il war? If it devolves into Soma­lia ‑like chaos? What then? What’s our commitment? 

SEC. GATES: Well, the pres­i­dent has made very clear there will be no Amer­i­can troops on the ground in Libya. He’s, he’s made that quite def­i­nite. Our air pow­er has sig­nif­i­cant­ly degrad­ed his armor capa­bil­i­ties, his abil­i­ty to use his armor against cities like Beng­hazi. We see them begin­ning to move back to the west, retreat­ing. So, you know, this even­tu­al­ly is going to have to be set­tled by the Libyans them­selves, per­haps the U.N. can medi­ate or what­ev­er. But in terms of the mil­i­tary com­mit­ment, the pres­i­dent has put some very strict lim­i­ta­tions in terms of what we are pre­pared to do. 

MR. GREGORY: I want to ask you, Sec­re­tary Clin­ton, if I can, about the rest of the region because there is so much else that’s hap­pen­ing. And I want to go to the map and, and go through these in turn. First, as we look at the broad­er Mid­dle East, we look at Syr­ia. Dead­ly protests, because of a gov­ern­ment crack­down, that have been occur­ring over the past few days. Is it the posi­tion of the gov­ern­ment that we would like to see the Assad regime fall? 

SEC. CLINTON: What we have said is what we’ve said through­out this extra­or­di­nary peri­od of trans­for­ma­tion in North Africa and the Mid­dle East. We want to see no vio­lence. We want to see peace­ful protests that enables peo­ple to express their uni­ver­sal human rights. And we want to see eco­nom­ic and polit­i­cal reform. That’s what we’ve called on in Syr­ia, that’s what we’ve called on oth­er gov­ern­ments across the region to do. 

MR. GREGORY: What about Sau­di Ara­bia? We go back to the map, Sec­re­tary Gates. The king is quite upset with the pres­i­dent. The rela­tion­ship has rup­tured to the point that he has sent troops into Bahrain. He would not see both of you when you were in the region. What are we doing to fix a rup­tured rela­tion­ship with per­haps our most impor­tant part­ner in the region when it comes to oil as well as oth­er matters? 

SEC. GATES: Well, first of all, I don’t believe the rela­tion­ship is rup­tured. We have a very strong rela­tion­ship with Sau­di Ara­bia. I think that the Saud­is see all of this tur­bu­lence in the region with some dis­qui­et. They’re very con­cerned about Iran. They believe that Iran will be able to take advan­tage of the sit­u­a­tion in var­i­ous of these coun­tries. And those are their con­cerns, and we share some of those con­cerns. But I think, I think it’s a great exag­ger­a­tion to say this relationship’s rup­tured. I, I intend to vis­it the region in the near term and, and hope and intend to see the king. So I think we have a very strong rela­tion­ship. We have a very strong mil­i­tary to mil­i­tary rela­tion­ship. As you know, the Saud­is just made one of the largest pur­chas­es of Amer­i­can weapons in, in their his­to­ry. So I think it’s over­drawn. Do we have some dif­fer­ences of view? Absolute­ly. But that’s — friends hap­pen — that hap­pens between friends all the time. 

MR. GREGORY: Back to the map. In addi­tion to Yemen, I want to actu­al­ly focus on Egypt, still the strate­gic cor­ner­stone. Yemen, of course, impor­tant, but it is in Egypt that is a strate­gic cor­ner­stone of this region. What are we doing, Sec­re­tary Clin­ton, at this point to try to assist the young, sec­u­lar move­ment that wants to find a way toward lead­er­ship that may be out­manned now by the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood and Mubarak ’s own party? 

SEC. CLINTON: Well, David, first, we have his­tor­i­cal­ly done quite a bit in reach­ing out to the very young peo­ple you’re refer­ring to. When I was just in Egypt, I met with a num­ber of those who had been lead­ers of the activ­i­ties in Tahrir Square and that were hop­ing to trans­late that protest into polit­i­cal action. A lot of them had been in Amer­i­can gov­ern­ment ‑spon­sored pro­grams, they’d been on vis­i­ta­tion pro­grams to the Unit­ed States. And we are con­tin­u­ing to reach out and work with them and to try to pro­vide sup­port to them. It is hard mov­ing from being in the fore­front of a move­ment to being part of a polit­i­cal process. It’s hard in any coun­try, but we’re going to stand with them and make sure that, at least in so far as we’re able to, they get the sup­port they need. At the same time, though, we are also work­ing with the inter­im gov­ern­ment in Egypt. Both Bob and I, when we were recent­ly in Egypt , met with gov­ern­ment offi­cials and met with the mil­i­tary offi­cials who are, for the time being, run­ning the gov­ern­ment. We want to assist them on the eco­nom­ic reform efforts that they’re under­tak­ing. Now, ulti­mate­ly, this is up to the Egyp­tians. They’re going to have to make these deci­sions. But we’ve offered our advice, and we’re offer­ing aid where appropriate. 

MR. GREGORY: Sec­re­tary Gates, is Libya in our vital inter­est as a country? 

SEC. GATES: No. I don’t think it’s a vital inter­est for the Unit­ed States, but we clear­ly have inter­ests there, and it’s a part of the region which is a vital inter­est for the Unit­ed States. 

MR. GREGORY: I think a lot of peo­ple would hear that and way, well, that’s quite strik­ing. Not in our vital inter­est, and yet we’re com­mit­ting mil­i­tary resources to it. 

SEC. CLINTON: Well, but, but, but then it would­n’t be fair as to what Bob just said. I mean, did Libya attack us? No. They did not attack us. Do they have a very crit­i­cal role in this region and do they neigh­bor two coun­tries — you just men­tioned one, Egypt, the oth­er Tunisia — that are going through these extra­or­di­nary trans­for­ma­tions and can­not afford to be desta­bi­lized by con­flict on their bor­ders? Yes. Do they have a major influ­ence on what goes on in Europe because of every­thing from oil to immigration? 

And, you know, David, that rais­es a, a very impor­tant point. Because you showed on the map just a minute ago Afghanistan. You know, we asked our allies, our NATO allies, to go into Afghanistan with us 10 years ago. They have been there, and a lot of them have been there despite the fact they were not attacked. The attack came on us as we all trag­i­cal­ly remem­ber. They stuck with us. When it comes to Libya, we start­ed hear­ing from the UK, France, Italy, oth­er of our NATO allies. This was in their vital nation­al inter­est. The UK and France were the ones who went to the Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil and said, “We have to act because oth­er­wise we’re see­ing a real­ly vio­lent upheaval with a man who has a his­to­ry of unpre­dictable vio­lent acts right on our doorstep.” 

So, you know, let, let’s be fair here. They did­n’t attack us, but what they were doing and Gad­hafi ’s his­to­ry and the poten­tial for the dis­rup­tion and insta­bil­i­ty was very much in our inter­ests, as Bob said , and seen by our Euro­pean friends and our Arab part­ners as very vital to their interests. 

(Sec­tion on anoth­er top­ic omitted.) 

MR. GREGORY: Thank you both very much. 

SEC. CLINTON: Thank you. 

SEC. GATES: Thank you. 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →