Lynn Examines Transitions Facing U.S., Iraqis

BAGHDAD, Oct. 26, 2010 — Deputy Defense Sec­re­tary William J. Lynn III said he is vis­it­ing Iraq to ensure the ongo­ing tran­si­tion to Iraqi-pro­vid­ed secu­ri­ty is on track.

Lynn arrived here today and imme­di­ate­ly went into meet­ings with Army Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, com­man­der of U.S. Forces Iraq and U.S. Ambas­sador to Iraq James Jeffrey. 

Fol­low­ing those meet­ings Lynn vis­it­ed with troops of the 1st Armored Divi­sion and the 1st Advise and Assist Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Divi­sion at U.S. Divi­sion-Cen­tral. He also vis­it­ed with troop­ers of the 7th Cav­al­ry at Joint Secu­ri­ty Sta­tion Fal­con locat­ed south of the city. 

Lynn is respon­si­ble for the day-to-day man­age­ment of the depart­ment, but he tries, he said, to get to the area of oper­a­tions to make the con­nec­tions with the deci­sions made in Washington. 

“Any­thing we do in Wash­ing­ton is only impor­tant as it inter­sects the mis­sion out here in the field,” Lynn told reporters here today. 

The deputy dis­cussed three over­lap­ping tran­si­tions occur­ring in Iraq. The first is the tran­si­tion from U.S. com­bat pow­er to the Iraqi forces tak­ing over the secu­ri­ty mis­sion. The sec­ond is the trans­fer of respon­si­bil­i­ties from the U.S. mil­i­tary to the U.S. State Depart­ment. The third is tran­si­tion­ing all U.S. forces out of Iraq by the end of 2011. 

The tran­si­tion of the U.S. mil­i­tary mis­sion in Iraq from a com­bat force to an advise-and-assist force has gone smooth­ly, Lynn said. 

“We help enable the [Iraqi] forces and work in the back­ground, but we no longer play a prin­ci­ple role,” the deputy defense sec­re­tary said. “That’s going to con­tin­ue as we draw the force down further.” 

The Amer­i­cans and Iraqis worked togeth­er well to trans­fer this respon­si­bil­i­ty, Lynn said. 

“The next step is for them to be able to oper­ate over the next 15 months with less and less U.S. mil­i­tary sup­port and ulti­mate­ly U.S. forces leav­ing,” he said. “The focus there, now that they have the com­bat role, is to make sure they can do the nit­ty grit­ty of defense as well, which is main­tain­ing the equip­ment, sup­port­ing the weapons sys­tems, acquir­ing new capa­bil­i­ty. That’s always a chal­lenge for a new military.” 

The U.S. mil­i­tary also is tran­si­tion­ing a num­ber of mis­sions to the State Depart­ment. Devel­op­ment, acqui­si­tion and train­ing, Lynn said, are the biggest mis­sion areas with police train­ing being the most complex. 

“Police train­ing is a crit­i­cal role and has to be tran­si­tioned,” he said. “We’re look­ing at [tran­si­tion­ing] the equip­ment, the sup­port­ing materiel, build­ing, bases –- what­ev­er [the] State [Depart­ment] needs to do those missions.” 

Mean­while, U.S. mil­i­tary and coali­tion train­ers are work­ing “to tran­si­tion the train­ers and con­trac­tors from a DOD lead to a State lead,” Lynn said. “In terms of the resources, the State Depart­ment is ask­ing the Con­gress for the resources they need to do that. We’re still work­ing with Con­gress to get that approved. I think there are chal­lenges in the resource area.” 

Obtain­ing the nec­es­sary resources, Lynn said, is crit­i­cal to main­tain­ing progress that has been made in Iraq to date. 

“We’ve achieved some­thing here in Iraq,” he said. “We would hate, as we do this tran­si­tion, to let some of that suc­cess dis­ap­pear because we did­n’t fund the appro­pri­ate amount for train­ing and support.” 

Lynn said the State Depart­ment will have to ramp up per­son­nel as the tran­si­tion continues. 

“As the U.S. mil­i­tary draws down [in Iraq], the State Depart­ment will ramp up,” Lynn said. “The part­ner­ship with State is strong. It’s not unchal­lenged, this is a very large enter­prise, but I think we feel good about the way it’s going.” 

And, tran­si­tion­ing troops and equip­ment out of Iraq is a huge job, Lynn said. Up to Sep­tem­ber, the U.S. mil­i­tary shipped 1.3 mil­lion pieces of equip­ment out of Iraq. This runs the gamut of com­put­ers to M1A2 Abrams tanks. 

“Basi­cal­ly any­thing with a bar code [will be prepped to depart Iraq],” Lynn said. 

Today, there’s 2.1 mil­lion pieces of equip­ment left to tran­si­tion and that job must be com­plet­ed over the next 15 months, the deputy sec­re­tary said. 

Mean­while, the Iraqis are work­ing to form their new gov­ern­ment fol­low­ing the nation­al elec­tions held in March. Lynn said he hopes the Iraqis form a broad-based government. 

“We do need to get a gov­ern­ment formed,” he said, “but more than the speed of the for­ma­tion of the gov­ern­ment, is the breadth and inclu­sion of it.” 

Some issues can­not be decid­ed until a new Iraqi gov­ern­ment is in pow­er, Lynn said. These issues, he said, include the future of U.S.-Iraqi mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary con­tacts and the Iraqi defense budget. 

Regard­ing the Wik­ileaks sto­ry, Lynn told reporters here that the 400,000 doc­u­ments post­ed on the Web are stolen material. 

“We don’t think it should have been released,” he said. “We’re dis­turbed about the impli­ca­tion, par­tic­u­lar­ly with the vol­ume of it in that it gives insight to poten­tial adver­saries to how we oper­ate, how we interact. 

“Indeed,” he con­tin­ued, “there are groups out there who say they are min­ing this data to use against us. We think it’s prob­lem­at­ic in that sense.” 

The Wik­ileaks sit­u­a­tion presents some hard choic­es for the U.S. mil­i­tary, Lynn said. In the first Gulf War, he said, com­man­ders want­ed more real-time intel­li­gence. The way the sys­tem worked then, Lynn said, was that intel­li­gence was sent to Wash­ing­ton, where it was ana­lyzed and sent back to com­man­ders in the field. Often it was out-of-date by the time it arrived. 

Lynn said part of the prob­lem back then was the Inter­net was­n’t devel­oped or robust enough to send the mas­sive num­bers of elec­trons need­ed to con­sti­tute real-time information. 

The Inter­net is much more mature today, Lynn said, not­ing “the idea [now] is to get as much of the rel­e­vant intel­li­gence out to the field as pos­si­ble. We tried to change the process so the intel­li­gence is avail­able to warfight­ers, when they need it. We don’t want to change that. It’s an impor­tant ele­ment in the suc­cess we’ve had.” 

Still, there must be a bet­ter way to pro­tect infor­ma­tion, so this type of mas­sive loss does­n’t reoc­cur, Lynn said. One way, he said, is to more close­ly mon­i­tor the actions of intel­li­gence spe­cial­ists, for exam­ple, to see what type and amounts of clas­si­fied doc­u­ments are downloaded. 

There may be a good rea­son for down­load­ing clas­si­fied doc­u­ments, “but you do like the cred­it card com­pa­nies do and noti­fy offi­cials of the abnor­mal use,” Lynn said. 

Lynn said he is very impressed with the work that U.S. ser­vice­mem­bers are accom­plish­ing in Iraq. 

“It’s amaz­ing the job they are doing,” he said. “I just [vis­it­ed] a unit out at FOB [For­ward Oper­at­ing Base] Fal­con –- where they turned over a base that had 7,000 U.S. forces on it. Now there are a few U.S. forces and two brigades of Iraqi police are mov­ing in to han­dle the secu­ri­ty for much of Bagh­dad from that area.” 

That area, he said, was in a part of the out­skirts of Bagh­dad that Amer­i­can forces had to fight their way into in 2006 and 2007. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →