Leaders Outline Projected Senior Officer Cuts

WASHINGTON, Sept. 15, 2011 — The nation’s mil­i­tary ser­vices will reduce their gen­er­al and flag offi­cer ranks by 103 by the end of 2014, senior Defense Depart­ment offi­cials told Con­gress mem­bers yes­ter­day.

Clif­ford L. Stan­ley, under­sec­re­tary of defense for per­son­nel and readi­ness, led the wit­ness slate for a two-part hear­ing before the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Committee’s per­son­nel sub­com­mit­tee on gen­er­al and flag offi­cer require­ments. He was joined by Navy Vice Adm. William E. Gort­ney, direc­tor of the Joint Staff, and Ben­jamin J. Free­man, a nation­al secu­ri­ty fel­low for the Project on Gov­ern­ment Over­sight Loca­tion.

Stan­ley and Gort­ney led a study group tasked by then-Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates to iden­ti­fy at least 50 active-duty gen­er­al or flag offi­cer posi­tions to be elim­i­nat­ed as part of Gates’ effi­cien­cy ini­tia­tives launched in 2010, Stan­ley said.

“In addi­tion, the sec­re­tary direct­ed that we seek every oppor­tu­ni­ty to elim­i­nate bureau­cra­cy, reduce over­head, and devel­op poli­cies to bet­ter man­age future gen­er­al and flag-offi­cer growth,” he added.

The study group reviewed the 952 autho­rized one- to four-star active-duty flag and gen­er­al offi­cer posi­tions across the ser­vices autho­rized in 2010, Stan­ley said, and it rec­om­mend­ed that 110 posi­tions be elim­i­nat­ed.

Gates approved 103 for elim­i­na­tion, 23 for reduc­tion to a less­er grade, and 10 to be real­lo­cat­ed to joint orga­ni­za­tions such as U.S. Cyber Com­mand, he said.

Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta, who suc­ceed­ed Gates, has accept­ed the poli­cies put in place by his pre­de­ces­sor, Stan­ley said.

The elim­i­nat­ed flag-offi­cer posi­tions will remain autho­rized, which gives DOD flex­i­bil­i­ty to meet emerg­ing require­ments, the under­sec­re­tary said.

Sim­i­lar­ly, Stan­ley said, the mil­i­tary depart­ments have iden­ti­fied posi­tions they can elim­i­nate or trans­fer to the senior exec­u­tive ser­vice, the civil­ian equiv­a­lent of flag offi­cers, to gain that same flex­i­bil­i­ty.

“We refer to this as a ser­vice buffer,” Stan­ley said. “This buffer serves as a shock absorber against new require­ments, allow­ing an off­set posi­tion to be elim­i­nat­ed with­out neg­a­tive impact on the mis­sion or per­son­nel caused by ill-timed action.”

Gort­ney said weeks before the study group set to work, the ser­vices eval­u­at­ed their gen­er­al or flag offi­cer posi­tions as “must have, need to have, good to have, and nice to have.”

The study group includ­ed mem­bers of the Office of the Sec­re­tary of Defense, the Joint Staff, and rep­re­sen­ta­tives from each service’s gen­er­al and flag-offi­cer man­age­ment offices, the vice admi­ral not­ed.

“The study group went after growth, and the major­i­ty of the growth was in over­seas con­tin­gency oper­a­tions,” he said.

Gort­ney not­ed that of the 103 posi­tions approved for elim­i­na­tion, 47 are from over­seas con­tin­gency oper­a­tions includ­ing those in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Free­man tes­ti­fied on the Project on Gov­ern­ment Oversight’s inves­ti­ga­tion of gen­er­al and flag offi­cer num­bers in the U.S. mil­i­tary.

“In the decade since the war in Afghanistan began, high­er ranks grew at a much faster rate than low­er ranks,” he said. “The top offi­cer ranks … have grown faster than enlist­ed and low­er offi­cer ranks, and the three- and four-star ranks have increased faster than all oth­er com­po­nents of the DOD’s force struc­ture.”

Marine Corps Gen. Joseph F. Dun­ford Jr., assis­tant Marine Corps com­man­dant, and the ser­vice vice chiefs of staff, Army Gen. Peter W. Chiarel­li, Navy Adm. Mark E. Fer­gu­son III, and Air Force Gen. Philip M. Breedlove, made up the pan­el for part two of the hear­ing.

As oper­a­tions in Iraq and Afghanistan draw down, Chiarel­li told the sub­com­mit­tee, Pen­ta­gon lead­ers “rec­og­nize the mil­i­tary ser­vices will be required to make reduc­tions to end strength to include with­in our flag and gen­er­al offi­cer ranks.”

By 2014, the Army will reduce the num­ber of its inter­nal gen­er­al offi­cers by 11 and its joint pool from 102 to a min­i­mum of 82, Chiarel­li said. The Army’s gen­er­al offi­cer end strength, he added, will then be 301, one less than the num­ber in place from 1995 to 2008.

“We believe this pro­ject­ed end strength will be suf­fi­cient to meet our need [for] senior lead­er­ship, both inter­nal to the Army and across the Depart­ment of Defense,” Chiarel­li said. “That said, any fur­ther reduc­tions or accel­er­a­tion of planned reduc­tions would jeop­ar­dize our abil­i­ty to effec­tive­ly meet those require­ments.”

Fer­gu­son said the Navy will change some 25 posi­tions, for an end strength of 149 flag offi­cers assigned to the ser­vice and 60 in the joint pool.

“In addi­tion, we down­grad­ed 50 offi­cers,” he said. “Flag posi­tions were con­vert­ed to senior exec­u­tive ser­vice. We ful­ly sup­port these reduc­tions and believe that we’re appro­pri­ate­ly sized for our cur­rent task­ing.”

Dun­ford said the Marine Corps will reduce its joint gen­er­al offi­cer pool from 26 to 21 by 2015, and has already elim­i­nat­ed one senior exec­u­tive ser­vice posi­tion.

“The cur­rent mix of Marine Corps gen­er­al offi­cers rep­re­sents the prop­er bal­ance to sup­port Marine Corps oper­at­ing forces in sup­port­ing ele­ment demands across the globe, and we’re sat­is­fied with our joint rep­re­sen­ta­tion,” he said.

Breedlove said the Air Force has tar­get­ed 39 gen­er­al offi­cer posi­tions and nine SES posi­tions for elim­i­na­tion.

When the reduc­tions are com­plete in 2014, the Air Force will have 261 gen­er­al offi­cers and 188 senior exec­u­tive ser­vice posi­tions, he said.

“Ulti­mate­ly, we believe that we [will] have the cor­rect mix of mil­i­tary offi­cers and civil­ian exec­u­tives to pro­vide the Air Force with the best lead­er­ship team,” Breedlove said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →