IV EU-Chile Summit — Joint Communiqué

The Fourth Euro­pean Union-Chile Sum­mit was held in Madrid (Spain) on 17 May 2010. The Euro­pean Union (EU) was rep­re­sent­ed by Mr Her­man Van Rompuy, Pres­i­dent of the Euro­pean Coun­cil, Mr José Manuel Durão Bar­roso, Pres­i­dent of the Euro­pean Com­mis­sion, with the par­tic­i­pa­tion of the Pres­i­dent of the Gov­ern­ment of Spain and Pres­i­dent in turn of the Coun­cil of the Euro­pean Union, Mr José Luis Rodríguez Zap­a­tero.

The Repub­lic of Chile was rep­re­sent­ed by the Pres­i­dent, Mr Sebastián Piñera Echenique.

1. This Sum­mit was the fourth insti­tu­tion­alised polit­i­cal dia­logue between Chile and the EU at the lev­el of Heads of State and Gov­ern­ment since the entry into force of the Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment, and the first since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lis­bon.

2. The meet­ing took place in a very pos­i­tive atmos­phere, reflect­ing the pio­neer­ing nature of the EU-Chile part­ner­ship and excel­lent rela­tions that exist across the board between Chile and the Euro­pean Union. The Sum­mit con­firmed the degree of matu­ri­ty and mutu­al con­fi­dence that has been achieved in the polit­i­cal dia­logue. This is high­light­ed by the sig­nif­i­cant extent to which the par­ties coin­cide on insti­tu­tion­al prin­ci­ples and social val­ues, plac­ing par­tic­u­lar empha­sis on democ­ra­cy, the rule of law, good gov­er­nance, fun­da­men­tal free­doms and full respect for human rights as fun­da­men­tal pil­lars of the rela­tion­ship. The lead­ers also con­curred that the Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment has great poten­tial to fur­ther enhance the rela­tion­ship that has yet to be ful­ly exploit­ed.

3. The EU and Chile agreed to coor­di­nate their work at inter­na­tion­al lev­el on the main glob­al top­ics by enhanc­ing bilat­er­al pol­i­cy exchanges on glob­al issues such as envi­ron­ment, cli­mate change, human secu­ri­ty, dis­ar­ma­ment, free trade, ener­gy, sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy and the for­ma­tion of human cap­i­tal.

4. The Euro­pean Union took note of Chile´s readi­ness to accept the LAC pres­i­den­cy of the EU-LAC Dia­logue. Chile and the EU high­light­ed the rel­e­vance of the EULAC process for strength­en­ing bi-region­al dia­logue as well as address­ing the main glob­al chal­lenges.

5. Both par­ties con­clud­ed that the entry into force of the Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment and its imple­men­ta­tion in recent years have made a pos­i­tive con­tri­bu­tion to strength­en­ing their rela­tion­ship. They under­lined in par­tic­u­lar the intense and col­lab­o­ra­tive joint effort that had allowed the EU and Chile to draw up the road map and work pro­gramme for the Asso­ci­a­tion for Devel­op­ment and Inno­va­tion that was estab­lished dur­ing the 7th Asso­ci­a­tion Com­mit­tee. Both par­ties high­light­ed the impor­tant role of the Asso­ci­a­tion for Devel­op­ment and Inno­va­tion (ADI) in fos­ter­ing fur­ther inten­si­fi­ca­tion of con­sul­ta­tions, coop­er­a­tion and coor­di­na­tion at all lev­els with­in the frame­work of the Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment. The par­ties agreed the ADI should con­tin­ue to focus on spe­cif­ic activ­i­ties to stim­u­late eco­nom­ic growth and social cohe­sion, ini­tial­ly in key areas — name­ly Edu­ca­tion, and Ener­gy, Envi­ron­ment & Cli­mate Change — with inno­va­tion as a cross-cut­ting theme.

6. Both par­ties wel­comed the sig­nif­i­cant progress in bilat­er­al trade, as well as the increased lev­el of invest­ment in goods and ser­vices, that had been achieved since the entry into force of the Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment. Thus, bilat­er­al trade between Chile and the EU has dou­bled in the peri­od between 2003 and 2009, while EU invest­ment in Chile in the peri­od between 1974 and 2009 reached €21 bil­lion, account­ing for 38% of the total For­eign Invest­ment received by Chile dur­ing this peri­od. The par­ties con­sid­er that the full util­i­sa­tion of the trade oppor­tu­ni­ties offered by the Agree­ment remains an impor­tant objec­tive in the bilat­er­al rela­tion­ship, in accor­dance with the pro­vi­sions of the respec­tive arti­cles of the Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment. The par­ties will make efforts, in the best pos­si­ble time scale, to devel­op the poten­tial of the Agree­ment as regards goods and ser­vices, explor­ing sce­nar­ios that make pos­si­ble a mutu­al­ly sat­is­fac­to­ry out­come.

7. The par­ties wel­comed the sig­na­ture of the frame­work agree­ment between Chile and the Euro­pean Invest­ment Bank (EIB) which will enable the EIB to oper­ate in Chile. Chile under­took to make every effort to com­plete its process of rat­i­fi­ca­tion of the agree­ment. The par­ties con­curred on the impor­tant role that the EIB can play in sup­port­ing invest­ment projects in Chile, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the renew­able ener­gy sec­tor and in the medi­um- to long-term recon­struc­tion effort.

8. Both par­ties wel­comed the forth­com­ing cre­ation of the Latin Amer­i­ca Invest­ment Facil­i­ty (LAIF). The Pres­i­dent of the Euro­pean Com­mis­sion con­firmed its readi­ness to fast-track Chilean requests to help with recon­struc­tion if so request­ed.

9. Pres­i­dent Bar­roso and Pres­i­dent Piñera exchanged views on the state of imple­men­ta­tion of coop­er­a­tion pro­grammes in the frame­work of the Coun­try Strat­e­gy Paper 2007–2013 and of the Mid-Term Review of this coop­er­a­tion. The par­ties con­sid­ered that the impact of bilat­er­al coop­er­a­tion to date has been pos­i­tive and wel­comed the con­fir­ma­tion of clear links between the coop­er­a­tion pri­or­i­ties and the Asso­ci­a­tion for Devel­op­ment and Inno­va­tion (ADI) by the Mid- Term Review. Both par­ties were con­fi­dent that the results of the forth­com­ing coop­er­a­tion peri­od (2011–13) — with a Euro­pean con­tri­bu­tion of €15.58 mil­lion and an equiv­a­lent Chilean con­tri­bu­tion, retain­ing the pri­ori­ti­sa­tion of Social Cohe­sion and Inno­va­tion and Com­pet­i­tive­ness – would be of equal or even bet­ter qual­i­ty. Both par­ties wel­comed the deci­sion to co-finance projects in the frame­work of the ADI, not­ing that the planned activ­i­ties were a tan­gi­ble demon­stra­tion of its rel­e­vance. Final­ly, both par­ties agreed to con­sid­er the recon­struc­tion pri­or­i­ties of Chile in the con­text of the cur­rent coop­er­a­tion.

10. The Euro­pean Union con­grat­u­lat­ed Chile on its acces­sion to the Organ­i­sa­tion for Eco­nom­ic Coop­er­a­tion and Devel­op­ment and praised its active involve­ment in emerg­ing new coop­er­a­tion modal­i­ties such as “tri­an­gu­lar” or “south-south” coop­er­a­tion with oth­er coun­tries in Latin Amer­i­ca and the Caribbean. Both par­ties con­firmed their will to work togeth­er on this impor­tant issue.

11. Despite the fact that the results of Copen­hagen fell short of their expec­ta­tions, the par­ties con­curred that they rep­re­sent a step for­ward in the glob­al fight against cli­mate change and agreed to work togeth­er ahead of the COP 16 of the Unit­ed Nations Frame­work Con­ven­tion on Cli­mate Change in Mex­i­co, towards a legal­ly bind­ing and glob­al­ly-reach­ing agree­ment aimed at reduc­ing and lim­it­ing green­house gas emis­sions to keep the increase in glob­al tem­per­a­ture below 2 degrees, tak­ing into account the prin­ci­ple of com­mon but dif­fer­en­ti­at­ed respon­si­bil­i­ties. Both par­ties expressed a shared inter­est in improv­ing ener­gy effi­cien­cy and in reduc­ing the inten­si­ty of green­house gas emis­sions in their respec­tive economies with a view to address­ing the eco­nom­ic, social and secu­ri­ty chal­lenges posed by cli­mate change. The par­ties also coin­cid­ed on the impor­tance of tak­ing into con­sid­er­a­tion the impacts of cli­mate change in all rel­e­vant plan­ning and deci­sion-mak­ing in order to guide and effec­tive­ly imple­ment nation­al adap­ta­tion mea­sures.

12. Both par­ties recog­nised the fun­da­men­tal impor­tance of bio­di­ver­si­ty for cli­mate change mit­i­ga­tion and adap­ta­tion, and for long-term human well-being, and agreed to step up efforts to fight bio­di­ver­si­ty loss, includ­ing by adopt­ing a new and more effec­tive glob­al strat­e­gy at COP10 of the Unit­ed Nations Con­ven­tion on Bio­di­ver­si­ty. The par­ties wel­comed the process agreed at the 2010 UNEP Gov­ern­ing Coun­cil to improve the sci­ence-pol­i­cy inter­face for bio­di­ver­si­ty and eco-sys­tem ser­vices.

13. Both sides reviewed the main activ­i­ties car­ried out since the last bilat­er­al Sum­mit, includ­ing the third sec­toral dia­logue on employ­ment poli­cies (San­ti­a­go, 17–19 Novem­ber 2008), the sem­i­nar mark­ing the fifth anniver­sary of the entry into force of the Asso­ci­a­tion Agree­ment (San­ti­a­go, 28 Novem­ber 2008), the 4th meet­ing of the Steer­ing Com­mit­tee of the Sci­ence and Tech­nol­o­gy Agree­ment (Brus­sels, 24 April 2009), the Human Rights Dia­logue (San­ti­a­go, 21 April 2009) and the very pos­i­tive and con­struc­tive Fourth Asso­ci­a­tion Coun­cil (Prague, 14 May 2009) and the 7th Asso­ci­a­tion Com­mit­tee (Brus­sels, 15 Octo­ber 2009). The par­ties high­light­ed the excel­lent col­lab­o­ra­tion that had char­ac­terised the organ­i­sa­tion of these and many oth­er events that had tak­en place at tech­ni­cal lev­el in the pre­vi­ous two years, as well as the valu­able con­clu­sions reached on top­ics of mutu­al inter­est.

14. The par­ties recog­nised the impor­tance of sec­toral pol­i­cy dia­logues estab­lished in a flex­i­ble and prag­mat­ic man­ner in the fields of Ener­gy; Envi­ron­ment and Cli­mate Change; Small and Medi­um Enter­pris­es and Inno­va­tion; high­light­ing both the impor­tance of these top­ics and also the role that Chile can play in imple­ment­ing con­crete projects that can have a region­al impact in the fields in ques­tion. The par­ties also re-con­firmed their com­mit­ment to con­tin­ue the Sec­toral Dia­logue on Employ­ment Poli­cies, includ­ing by coor­di­nat­ing these mat­ters at inter­na­tion­al lev­el, notably in the con­text of the Inter­na­tion­al Labour Organ­i­sa­tion (ILO).

15. Both par­ties expressed their sat­is­fac­tion with the work under­tak­en by the EUChile Joint Par­lia­men­tary Com­mit­tee (JPC), as well as with the con­tri­bu­tion made by this par­lia­men­tary dia­logue to the strength­en­ing of rela­tions between the two sides. Both par­ties took note of the Dec­la­ra­tions made by the JPC.

16. The par­ties expressed their deter­mi­na­tion to coop­er­ate in address­ing the con­se­quences of the glob­al eco­nom­ic and finan­cial cri­sis, and to pre­vent the recur­rence of such a cri­sis, in line with the goals set by the G‑20. Both par­ties would con­tin­ue to apply macro­eco­nom­ic and finan­cial poli­cies designed to restore mar­ket con­fi­dence, sta­bilise world finan­cial mar­kets, and fos­ter bal­anced and sus­tained glob­al eco­nom­ic growth, while aim­ing to mit­i­gate the impact of the cri­sis on the most vul­ner­a­ble sec­tors of soci­ety and imple­ment time­ly and coor­di­nat­ed exit strate­gies for over­com­ing the cri­sis. Both par­ties stressed their com­mit­ment to reach an ambi­tious, bal­anced and com­pre­hen­sive out­come to the Doha Devel­op­ment Round of trade nego­ti­a­tions.

17. Chile reit­er­at­ed its inter­est in mak­ing progress towards an ambi­tious avi­a­tion agree­ment. In this respect, both Par­ties agreed to make their best efforts to fur­ther the process that would allow the start of nego­ti­a­tions in this field.

18. The EU and Chile con­firmed their shared com­mit­ment to sup­port­ing the restora­tion of a secure and sta­ble envi­ron­ment in Haiti, in par­tic­u­lar in the postearthquake recov­ery, recon­struc­tion and sta­bil­i­ty efforts there. The EU applaud­ed Chile’s con­tin­ued engage­ment in Haiti even in the after­math of its own earth­quake and tsuna­mi.

19. The Pres­i­dent of Chile thanked the Euro­pean Union for its speedy and com­pre­hen­sive response to the dev­as­tat­ing earth­quake and tsuna­mi of 27 Feb­ru­ary, prais­ing the imme­di­ate deci­sion of the Euro­pean Com­mis­sion to allo­cate €3 mil­lion in human­i­tar­i­an assis­tance as well as the gen­er­ous con­tri­bu­tions both finan­cial and in kind that had been made by EU Mem­ber States. The Euro­pean Union under­lined its readi­ness to deploy fur­ther resources in sol­i­dar­i­ty with Chile´s gov­ern­ment and cit­i­zens, work­ing in part­ner­ship to iden­ti­fy mech­a­nisms and modal­i­ties that per­mit the achieve­ment of effec­tive and effi­cient coop­er­a­tion for the recon­struc­tion of the affect­ed areas.

20. Chile and the EU are exposed to a range of nat­ur­al dis­as­ters and have exten­sive expe­ri­ence in dis­as­ter pre­pared­ness, response and reha­bil­i­ta­tion. Not­ing this, the lead­ers instruct­ed their offi­cials speed­i­ly to explore the scope for estab­lish­ing a process of exchange of infor­ma­tion and expe­ri­ence between the EU and Chile in these fields, con­cur­ring that this process should also pro­mote bilat­er­al and, if rel­e­vant, tri­an­gu­lar coop­er­a­tion in the field of dis­as­ter pre­pared­ness.

21. Final­ly, under the insti­tu­tion­alised polit­i­cal dia­logue, both Par­ties agreed to hold a fur­ther meet­ing at the lev­el of Heads of State and Gov­ern­ment lev­el on a mutu­al­ly agreed date.

Source:
Coun­cil of the Euro­pean Union

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →