Iran — Gates: Nuclear Weapons Would Make Iran Less Secure

LONDON, June 8, 2010 — If Iran were to suc­ceed in acquir­ing nuclear weapons, the sub­se­quent chain of events would make that coun­try less secure, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said here today.

Dur­ing a news con­fer­ence, both Gates and British Defense Sec­re­tary Liam Fox expressed con­fi­dence that the Unit­ed Nations Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil soon will pass a new res­o­lu­tion impos­ing sanc­tions against Iran for its nuclear pro­gram and that more uni­lat­er­al sanc­tions could fol­low from coun­tries con­cerned about Iran’s nuclear ambitions. 

Gates said he believes it’s not too late, and that inter­na­tion­al coop­er­a­tion has the poten­tial to stop Iran from devel­op­ing nuclear weapons. 

“The key here is a com­bi­na­tion of diplo­ma­cy and pres­sure to per­suade the Ira­ni­ans that they are head­ed in the wrong direc­tion in terms of their own secu­ri­ty – that they will under­mine their secu­ri­ty by pur­suit of nuclear weapons, not enhance it,” he said. “For one thing, their obtain­ing a nuclear weapon would almost cer­tain­ly lead to pro­lif­er­a­tion of nuclear weapons else­where in the Mid­dle East and a num­ber of oth­er countries.” 

Fox said Iran is an increas­ing­ly mil­i­ta­rized coun­try with a hard-line, theo­crat­ic leader, and that it has shown in Iraq and Afghanistan its will­ing­ness to desta­bi­lize its neighbors. 

“And third­ly, I think the over­whelm­ing fear we have is that if Iran is to become a nuclear-weapons state, it may well be the end of [the Nuclear Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion Treaty] as we know it,” Fox con­tin­ued. “And after all that sac­ri­fice that both of our coun­tries made get­ting us to the end of the Cold War, lim­it­ing nuclear pro­lif­er­a­tion, and hav­ing cel­e­brat­ed last year the 20th anniver­sary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, we sure­ly want to do more than leave the next gen­er­a­tion a lega­cy of a new nuclear arms race in the world’s most unsta­ble region.” 

Gates said the Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil res­o­lu­tion would set the stage for fur­ther action from the inter­na­tion­al community. 

“One of the many ben­e­fits of the res­o­lu­tion is that it will pro­vide a legal plat­form for indi­vid­ual nations to then take indi­vid­ual actions that go well beyond the res­o­lu­tion itself,” he explained. “And I believe that a num­ber of nations are pre­pared to act pret­ty prompt­ly. But first things, first. The key is get­ting the resolution.” 

Fox said the res­o­lu­tion would make clear to Iran’s lead­er­ship that the world takes the issue seri­ous­ly, and that it would send a sig­nal to the Iran­ian peo­ple that the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty has a quar­rel with their government’s nuclear pro­gram and not with them. 

The Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil res­o­lu­tion, Fox added, also would show that the series of sanc­tions against the Iran­ian lead­er­ship is not being applied by a small num­ber of coun­tries, but rather by “the entire glob­al com­mu­ni­ty, which is unit­ed in inter­na­tion­al law in try­ing to pre­vent what would be a major desta­bi­liza­tion in terms of inter­na­tion­al security.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →