Initial Libya Mission Complete, Successful, Gates Says

WASHINGTON, April 1, 2011 — U.S. air­craft will remain on stand­by as NATO takes over mul­ti­lat­er­al oper­a­tions in Libya and the coali­tion con­sid­ers its future role there, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates told a Sen­ate com­mit­tee yes­ter­day.
U.S. mil­i­tary air­craft are still avail­able to NATO in the next few days until the orga­ni­za­tion for­mal­ly takes con­trol of mil­i­tary oper­a­tions over Libya, Gates told the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee. After that, the U.S. fight­er jets will remain on stand­by in case they are need­ed again, he said.

Gates and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ear­li­er appeared before the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee in what was a full day of tes­ti­mo­ny about the U.S. role in Libya.

Coali­tion forces had to halt air oper­a­tions over Libya due to bad weath­er for the past two days, caus­ing rebel forces to retreat from areas they’d gained since oper­a­tions began March 19, Mullen said.

Gates described the U.S. mil­i­tary mis­sion in Libya as an emer­gency prompt­ed by Libyan leader Moam­mar Gadhafi’s intent to use his mil­i­tary against civil­ians protest­ing for his ouster. With­out inter­ven­tion, he said, the sit­u­a­tion would have led to thou­sands of deaths, hun­dreds of thou­sands of refugees and desta­bi­liza­tion across North Africa. “That part of our mis­sion is com­plete and suc­cess­ful,” Gates said.

More than 20 nations, includ­ing sev­er­al Arab coun­tries, are par­tic­i­pat­ing in the NATO coali­tion — some pub­licly, some not — in dif­fer­ent ways to enforce U.N. Res­o­lu­tion 1973 that allows for the no-fly zone, Mullen said. The coali­tion, he said, was able to move fast to pre­vent a dis­as­ter because of U.S. rela­tions with those Euro­pean and Mid­dle East­ern nations.

“No one mil­i­tary, no one nation, can or should take on a mis­sion like this alone,” Mullen said. “This is not only a coali­tion of the will­ing — it is a coali­tion of the able.” The coali­tion has great­ly dimin­ished Gadhafi’s mil­i­tary air capa­bil­i­ties and many of his ground assets, the chair­man said. “My under­stand­ing is that focus will not dimin­ish under NATO lead­er­ship,” he said.

The coali­tion con­tin­ues to seize Libyan assets around the world, while sign­ing on more part­ners, Mullen said. Swedish offi­cials were the lat­est, hav­ing this week agreed to send eight air­craft to the effort, he said.

The coali­tion is con­sid­er­ing whether and how to give more sup­port to rebel forces, Gates said. “A deci­sion about sup­port to the oppo­si­tion is clear­ly the next step,” he said. “I think all mem­bers of the coali­tion are think­ing about that at this point.” A major con­sid­er­a­tion for the coali­tion is that not much is known about the rebels.

“We know a hand­ful of the lead­ers,” Gates said. “But oth­er than that, we real­ly don’t know much about what I think is dis­parate, dis­ag­gre­gat­ed oppo­si­tion to Gad­hafi.”

The issue is more com­pli­cat­ed than sim­ply arm­ing the rebels. What the oppo­si­tion real­ly needs, Gates said, is orga­ni­za­tion, train­ing, and com­mand and con­trol — some­thing he said like­ly requires coali­tion forces on the ground in Libya, which Gates and Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma said they are not will­ing to do.

“There real­ly is no crit­i­cal mass to work with” among the rebels, Gates added.

Gates and Mullen reject­ed the idea that the mil­i­tary mis­sion should be broad­ened to include regime change, although they acknowl­edged that is a polit­i­cal goal.

“I very much believe that the mis­sion as cur­rent­ly stat­ed — to pre­vent a human­i­tar­i­an cri­sis — is the right mis­sion at the right time,” Mullen said. “My expe­ri­ence with regime change is that it can be long and very, very inde­ter­mi­nate in its out­come.”

It may be that Gad­hafi will be forced from pow­er, pos­si­bly by an inter­nal mil­i­tary coup, Gates said. Coali­tion forces “will con­tin­ue to attack [Gadhafi’s] ground forces with no oppor­tu­ni­ty for resup­ply,” he said. “His mil­i­tary is going to face the ques­tion of whether they are pre­pared to be destroyed by air attacks, or if it’s time for him to go.”

After being repeat­ed­ly asked about broad­en­ing the scope of the mis­sion, Gates said Con­gress must also con­sid­er finan­cial real­i­ties. Con­gress has yet to pass the fis­cal 2011 bud­get and has forced the depart­ment to oper­ate under con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tions since Oct. 1. Besides oper­a­tions in Iraq and Afghanistan, Gates not­ed there are 19 ships and 18,000 ser­vice mem­bers deployed on a human­i­tar­i­an mis­sion in Japan.

“I acknowl­edge that I’m pre­oc­cu­pied with avoid­ing mis­sion creep” in Libya, the sec­re­tary said. “But … we are in seri­ous bud­get trou­ble with the ongo­ing CR. At a time when we are asked to do so much, this brings this issue home. I need help from the Con­gress. The Defense Depart­ment needs help from the Con­gress.”

At the same time, the sec­re­tary not­ed, there “are oth­ers who can ful­fill near­ly all of the role” in Libya, refer­ring to the coali­tion.

Asked to char­ac­ter­ize the rebel­lion in Libya, Gates reject­ed call­ing the sit­u­a­tion a civ­il war.

“I think it rep­re­sents a fair­ly broad-based upris­ing against an oppres­sive gov­ern­ment,” he said. “A civ­il war sug­gests there are two estab­lished gov­ern­ments that have some kind of struc­ture and are in con­flict for pow­er.”

The rebels’ core objec­tive seems to be “get­ting rid of the gov­ern­ment they’ve got,” the sec­re­tary said. “The prin­ci­pal chal­lenge we are all going to face is what hap­pens after Gad­hafi falls.”

The Unit­ed States and NATO “should­n’t exag­ger­ate our abil­i­ty to influ­ence that deci­sion,” Gates said, not­ing that would be bet­ter left to the Libyans and oth­ers in the region.

“There are a num­ber of pos­si­ble out­comes here, only one of which is some kind of democ­ra­cy,” he said. “My view is that the future of Libya — the U.S. ought not take respon­si­bil­i­ty for that, frankly. There are oth­er coun­tries in the region that can par­tic­i­pate in that, par­tic­u­lar­ly with non-lethal aid.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →